May 2022 LOAs - Good/Bad Discussion
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
All this is even more motivation to get out. I don’t want to see what PBS implementation feels like. Management must be feeling pleasantly surprised how easy this was, and optimistic getting a killer PBS system to realize true efficiencies not far away on the horizon. Perfect timing for when the airline is truly staffed 30% less. Those left behind will be truly miserable. I’m tired of anyone who says PBS can be a good thing and golden days are awesome. The statement is true, but naive to think it will be true at ENY. Negotiating a strong protection in PBS for QOL is just not realistic given past histories. It’s a complicated thing, and I hope we are hiring experts to figure this out. Short of that, we are hosed. If we don’t like the negotiated PBS, can we keep voting that down? Or is this train coming no matter what it looks like?
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
And honestly, I'm really hoping I'm gone before it's implemented fully and based on the union response in the call, I think that hope is plausible. I do feel bad for those behind me that have to live with it. At least I now get paid my unused sick pay when I leave! I mean, I guess they will too if they hang on for AA but those left behind will also have to deal with a sub par PBS deal to make up for it.
P.S. For all you dopes (union said there was a lot of you) that told the union to vote yes, I say thank you for giving me the sick payout! ;-) I hope you find the transition the PBS better than I think you will.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
And to be clear, my post was specifically about PBS. Without going back and re-reading the QOL LOA, I think everything else had a specific ‘no later than’ date attached to it. And well, yah know the company never misses such dates so you can count on that! ;-)
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
There was a timeline question in the All Call Chat. AS addressed it and made it sound like it would be a bit more of a ways off than that without specifying a definite timeline. Personally, I REALLY, hope so. I hope they union fights like crazy to get what they want. And when it becomes clear they won't (and they won't) I hope they take it to arbitration which will take more time. The arbitrator will give the company what they want and stiff the union. Operational needs are important, yah know. Then they'll have to shadow test it and what not. Sounded like later than Oct 22 to me.
And honestly, I'm really hoping I'm gone before it's implemented fully and based on the union response in the call, I think that hope is plausible. I do feel bad for those behind me that have to live with it. At least I now get paid my unused sick pay when I leave! I mean, I guess they will too if they hang on for AA but those left behind will also have to deal with a sub par PBS deal to make up for it.
P.S. For all you dopes (union said there was a lot of you) that told the union to vote yes, I say thank you for giving me the sick payout! ;-) I hope you find the transition the PBS better than I think you will.
And honestly, I'm really hoping I'm gone before it's implemented fully and based on the union response in the call, I think that hope is plausible. I do feel bad for those behind me that have to live with it. At least I now get paid my unused sick pay when I leave! I mean, I guess they will too if they hang on for AA but those left behind will also have to deal with a sub par PBS deal to make up for it.
P.S. For all you dopes (union said there was a lot of you) that told the union to vote yes, I say thank you for giving me the sick payout! ;-) I hope you find the transition the PBS better than I think you will.
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
I seriously doubt the PBS implementation will be much past October UNLESS the negotiators can push it to arbitration. A lot of folks say you can’t have ANY conflicts with PBS. But, sounds like it CAN, if it is a feature agreed upon. The company wants this because it can gain them about a ten percent efficiency overall. Obviously the senior pilots are the ones that have the most to lose, because they are the ones that have the seniority to consistently bid for the conflicts that get that soft pay. I would venture to say that one of the most common comments (complaints) is losing the ability to DTS for vacation. If that is what everyone (majority) REALLY wants, then contact the union reps and let them know. If the negotiators stick to their guns that’s what they want then force it to arbitration.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Agreed. But my point is what is the most important thing to the most people? Without input, the union doesn’t have anything to go on. How much they actually get and how long it takes is definitely something else.
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
As a side note, they’re making fun of us here:
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/r...ml#post3427558
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/r...ml#post3427558
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post