Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Skipping the Flow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2022, 04:46 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
ive told you, same as I said years ago. This will lead to buyouts, mergers, bankruptcies and consolidations. The WO are able to run their regionals at a loss to keep the feed into/out of the hubs as long as it keeps those mainline flights filled. They can - and will - improve flow and I’d say they may go as high as 80%-85% of all hires come from their WO.
they could increase CPA FFD rates to keep their vendors able to staff, but I consider this unlikely without the other big two raising their FFD rates also….. it’s easier to just buy the company, planes, pilots, equipment and all before or during the bankruptcy.

I’ve been saying this since 2013 that we were around 5-6 years away from a crisis. Covid delayed it 2 years.

They’re going to need age 67, and to start not just paying more, but having significant improvements to working conditions. This modern generation can make $5k-$10k a month with various online sales and automated marketing stuff that I’ll admit I just don’t get. Why commute on days off to crashpads sitting airport standby after having spent $175k-$250k getting your ratings and experience to make less than $90k at the best paying regional, and around $40k at the worst.

there is also the possibility of merging mainline with a consolidated owned regional. With the rates they’re paying now it would be cheaper. Folks would also take the $90 an hour to fly the E175 as the entry level AA jet, because they’d be actual APA pilots instead of waiting to flow. The closer the costs get, the less attractive maintaining 4 separate administrations and training departments becomes. We almost sold them on single list back in 2013-2014; with some effort it should be a much easier sell now.
The current rates are temporary and unsustainable. But the whole reason AAG is throwing money at the regionals is to keep them going. In 18 months or so when this hiring crisis has subsided the regional ranks will start filling again as the hiring of most non captain regional pilots will dry up. AAG sees that the regional model will still sustain and save them money as long as they can keep that core of qualified instructors through this period. As far as increasing flow, don’t expect to see a significant change. There will probably be some at some point as AA and the WOs come to an equilibrium between keeping captains and LCAs long enough to sustain things and paying them for too long to do that. I think they will try and manage that five years to flow a lot better, but it is such a moving target, or will be difficult. As long as they can get flow to around six years, I think they’ll be happy.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 07-11-2022, 01:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude View Post
The current rates are temporary and unsustainable. But the whole reason AAG is throwing money at the regionals is to keep them going. In 18 months or so when this hiring crisis has subsided the regional ranks will start filling again as the hiring of most non captain regional pilots will dry up. AAG sees that the regional model will still sustain and save them money as long as they can keep that core of qualified instructors through this period. As far as increasing flow, don’t expect to see a significant change. There will probably be some at some point as AA and the WOs come to an equilibrium between keeping captains and LCAs long enough to sustain things and paying them for too long to do that. I think they will try and manage that five years to flow a lot better, but it is such a moving target, or will be difficult. As long as they can get flow to around six years, I think they’ll be happy.
Flow costs them zero and if done correctly will fill the seats. The shortage will last more than 5 years too, closer to 10 actually.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 07-11-2022, 05:36 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
Flow costs them zero and if done correctly will fill the seats. The shortage will last more than 5 years too, closer to 10 actually.
Flow is not a zero cost if it is done beyond a sustainable rate. It means increased training costs. Yes, those are costs that will happen at some point anyway. It’s how RAPIDLY those costs are realized if they are not done at a managed rate. That management also means rapidly enough that you are not losing the feeder’s pilots to other sources because they see the flow is no longer beneficial to the pilot. It’s a balancing act. The other cost is having an overall less experienced pilot group. Those pages of errors listed by the FAA a while back are things that happen a lot more often when you don’t have experience. Thus far, none of those mistakes have been very expensive, but that will surely change as overall experience levels at regionals plunge.

As far as this shortage lasting more than two years, that’s not going to happen. The pay rates at regionals have been coming up enough to be attracting people back again and there are enough heavily sponsored programs that will bring more people into the industry that would have never been able to before.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:20 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,870
Default

If WO RJ flying is brought into Mainline, it will trigger all sorts of scope issues with every other work group. Way cheaper to keep regional pay for ramp, mtc, fa’s, gate agents, dispatch, etc
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:20 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB View Post
If WO RJ flying is brought into Mainline, it will trigger all sorts of scope issues with every other work group. Way cheaper to keep regional pay for ramp, mtc, fa’s, gate agents, dispatch, etc
I used to agree with you, and in a sense, maybe I still do.

However, at some point you cross a threshold where it’s no longer cheaper. That said even if it’s not cheaper, maybe management thinks it’s cheap enough to ride out the problem with temporary wage hikes so as to preserve the regional model for the future.


Also, add to the list maintenance personal that are in a shortage and probably shouldn’t be grouped up there with rampers, fa’s, and gate agents.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 08:03 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
I used to agree with you, and in a sense, maybe I still do.

However, at some point you cross a threshold where it’s no longer cheaper. That said even if it’s not cheaper, maybe management thinks it’s cheap enough to ride out the problem with temporary wage hikes so as to preserve the regional model for the future.


Also, add to the list maintenance personal that are in a shortage and probably shouldn’t be grouped up there with rampers, fa’s, and gate agents.
Pedro’s letter about how keeping pilots at Envoy (applies to all three wholly owned) would preserve other jobs. That’s the point. All those other jobs save money as well. Envoy and PDT do a large majority of AAG ground services so some of that wouldn’t change, but the regional model saves a lot of money and if AAG has to throw some money at it to cauterize the the hemorrhage then it still saves them money in the long run because it saves the model.

The airline industry always runs in waves as different factors affect things and corrections take time. This hiring wave won’t last and things will correct in the next two years. They don’t want to make any paradigm shifts to the system. It would be a Pandora’s box that would cost billions in the future.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 07-20-2022, 06:01 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

It seems to me that if the plan was just to roll us into mainline (which would instantly bottle attrition forever obviously), they'd have done that instead of pouring money on us. Nobody was talking about pay really, most of the noise was about mainline seniority numbers just prior to the pilot supply premium era.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 07-20-2022, 04:18 PM
  #28  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Originally Posted by NoValueAviator View Post
It seems to me that if the plan was just to roll us into mainline (which would instantly bottle attrition forever obviously), they'd have done that instead of pouring money on us. Nobody was talking about pay really, most of the noise was about mainline seniority numbers just prior to the pilot supply premium era.
Plan A - Pour money on you.

Plan B - If Plan A does not work adequately well, roll the 3 W.O. subsidiaries in the mainline with appropriate staple, fence, or similar to keep a lifer on a regional from becoming a 787 Captain the next bid cycle.

Plan As and Bs of various things have been done before. Remember, this Plan A was at least a Plan C previously.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 07-20-2022, 04:56 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by NoValueAviator View Post
It seems to me that if the plan was just to roll us into mainline (which would instantly bottle attrition forever obviously), they'd have done that instead of pouring money on us. Nobody was talking about pay really, most of the noise was about mainline seniority numbers just prior to the pilot supply premium era.
There are multiple, contradictory, rumors. All the WO CEOs just got fancy new VP titles. Envoy and PDT are ground handling companies. They don’t want to change that status quo of keeping them separate and while labor turnover is always high on the ground side, that’s not going to change. PSA on the other hand has no ground component. No reason to give new titles to all of them if they were going to either merge the three or bring the pilots into AA.

AAG is throwing a chunk of money at the WO pilots to KEEP them as regionals. Hasn’t been enough time since this happened to see if this will bear any fruit so I just don’t think there would be a change this quickly one way or the other.
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 07:14 AM
  #30  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Da Magic View Post
Just wondering if anyone that’s due to flow in the next few months will forgo or wait a few months to make that decision?

Asked a different way: Is the money worth it to stay at envoy vs losing a few months of seniority at AA?
Make the jump asap. You will lose a bit of money the first couple of years in salary MAYBE, but with the benefits and the future with seniority, it will quickly make you forget about that.
journeytolegacy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ag386
Envoy Airlines
96
07-11-2019 06:15 AM
A320bound
PSA Airlines
16
10-06-2018 10:36 AM
Skyler02
Regional
9
12-29-2014 02:00 PM
N927EV
Regional
245
03-28-2014 06:29 AM
weekendflyer
Technical
11
06-22-2011 05:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices