More great news at Envoy!
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Feito no Brasil, CA
Posts: 833
#36
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
#38
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Last time I checked, Delta is ALPA and they have been screwing everyone since they let scope get away from them in 1992 when the first POS -200 rolled out...ALPA National has pandering to their big dues payers since de-regulation, and intentionally decided not to change their by-laws to level the playing field. Instead, they have perpetuated and exacerbated the two-tiered pay scheme that we have to day, which is now morphing into and even lower tier with this 12/4 pay scale...ALPA has done halcyon work in the field of safety, and establishing rules that have benefitted all pilots. Now? abject failure as a negotiating agent. There is a reason why this is an association, and if you ask anyone at National about what makes ALPA unique compared to other trade unions? The ability for each individual pilot group to have their own collective bargaining unit, MEC officers and the various committees. This addresses the individual needs, demographics and unique situation of each individual pilot group. So, please explain why pilot groups need to collude with one another? "Raise the Bar"? And, "Stop the Whipsaw" and all this other nonsense? Let me be clear I FULLY support my own company's MEC and other pilot volunteers. Because they are addressing the needs of MY pilot group.
Having said this, the controversy stems from the fact that the current system and association model used by ALPA is broken...Why do you think AA BROKE from ALPA ( apart from some internal politics and personality conflicts at the time ), or other carriers have decided an in-house union was a better fit than the ALPA Merry-go-round...
I get a feeling from reading a lot of this tripe presented here and elsewhere that we have a majority of "low information voters" that A. Don't know the history of ALPA ( read, "Flying the Line" Parts 1-3 ) AND, in their narrow and ignorance don't understand how business is business...
Having said this, the controversy stems from the fact that the current system and association model used by ALPA is broken...Why do you think AA BROKE from ALPA ( apart from some internal politics and personality conflicts at the time ), or other carriers have decided an in-house union was a better fit than the ALPA Merry-go-round...
I get a feeling from reading a lot of this tripe presented here and elsewhere that we have a majority of "low information voters" that A. Don't know the history of ALPA ( read, "Flying the Line" Parts 1-3 ) AND, in their narrow and ignorance don't understand how business is business...
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post