No retention bonus at envoy
#32
Bolded in red ^^^^^^
I believe that is the main reason on why PSA voted in the TA. Look how easy it is to transfer aircraft. Envoy 47 700's to PSA. PSA had 49 before the TA was approved. As you can see it would of been a joke for AAG to transfer PSA's whole fleet elsewhere (14 700's to envoy and 35 200's to Air Wisconson would of been feasible). Its obvious that the threats made against PSA were in fact legitimate about closing shop. That is my speculation.
I believe that is the main reason on why PSA voted in the TA. Look how easy it is to transfer aircraft. Envoy 47 700's to PSA. PSA had 49 before the TA was approved. As you can see it would of been a joke for AAG to transfer PSA's whole fleet elsewhere (14 700's to envoy and 35 200's to Air Wisconson would of been feasible). Its obvious that the threats made against PSA were in fact legitimate about closing shop. That is my speculation.
#33
#34
You better believe the threats were credible. PSA would of been gone in a year. Envoy pilots, I'm sorry this is happening. But PSA is not to blame. I don't want to hijack (another) Envoy tread here but seriously? You think anyone wanted this? Your mad at less than 150 remaining pilots in a pilot group of over 1,000 now. Be mad at management, not the pilots. The whipsaw will continue ad infinitum and PSA is not going to be immune to it either. It's the nature of this industry. We're growing today, and they will be trying to shove concessions down our throats tomorrow. Let everyone look and see what is happening at the AAG wholly-owneds and take a good long look.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
And he is now at AA lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 12
But isn't that what alpa does? Alpa is a bottom up organization, not a top down. Either alpa has to change or alpa has to go. Otherwise just keep on b*tchin everybody.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
If envoy is downsizing is it a good idea for me to go into the pipeline program. Or should I choose the 80k retention at endeavor? I don't understand why friends of mine are getting calls from envoy if they are downsizing. What about the 90 options on the 175? Hopefully all the April fools jokes are done because I have to make a choice soon. Please help.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 12
Envoy and American want a cost competitive labor structure, but it can't be had at envoy.
As an FO, you are not going to be added for growth, you are going to be added to replace the FO's who are already bailing for greener pastures. All the writing is on the wall, some are just refusing to see it. What ends up happening is the newly hired FO after about a year figures out "hey those guys weren't kidding, this place has got real problems".
#40
Somebody please explain to me how the threat to PSA was real. Transfer your 200's to Air Wisconsin? What purpose would that serve other than cost them more money? You guys can try to spin it any way you like, but you took the cowards way out. Now it looks as if another pilot group needs to suffer the consequences. But hey, at least you got yours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



