Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy to get 100% flow to AA.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2015 | 07:11 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default

Options aren't free. It is an investment.
Reply
Old 06-18-2015 | 07:21 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Reservist
Options aren't free. It is an investment.
Options can be sold.
Reply
Old 06-18-2015 | 07:24 PM
  #103  
snippercr's Avatar
Does NOT get weekends off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: ERJ - 145
Default

Originally Posted by LeadFoot
Doesn't RAH have a firm order for 47 E175's? That contract agreement is with American, and there is no word of cancelled orders from them.
I think all 47 have been delivered. When that order was announced back in 2012 I think the original number was 56. But there were also options in the order for an additional ~50. Again it was a few years ago but I thought those options if exercised had to be for AA . Although some have said those options expired
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 02:39 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

Thrustlever moving his vag lips in 3.....2.....1
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 03:12 AM
  #105  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
The RJ fleet count for AA is tied to the number of narrowbody aircraft at mainline. The retirement schedules and now delivery deferrals will limit the ability to add further large RJ's absent another change to the narrowbody retirement schedule.
Yes, and as more independents can't staff their existing flying (already happening) they won't be exercising their large RJ options. Meanwhile we've got the staffing to fly them.

It's exactly what I said. Whomever has the pilots will get their options exercised. Whomever can't, won't.

we're shrinking because our flow is working. Our attrition is not much greater than our hiring if you remove the flow.
We lose 35-40
20 are flows
We hire an average of 15, some months more, some months less.

Our attrition is mostly due to flow. We are the incredible shrinking airline because 62% of all new hires at AA have come from Envoy. The sooner people realize it's working, the sooner they can get in line.
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 03:15 AM
  #106  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by sublime259
I'm telling you, do what I did. Put him on ignore. It makes reading this thread much more enjoyable when all the crap he says just doesn't show up.
Done...

Good idea
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 05:40 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: middle seat in the back
Default

Originally Posted by sublime259
I'm telling you, do what I did. Put him on ignore. It makes reading this thread much more enjoyable when all the crap he says just doesn't show up.
I did that also, so much less BS to read now except when people quote him
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 06:04 AM
  #108  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
Yes, and as more independents can't staff their existing flying (already happening) they won't be exercising their large RJ options. Meanwhile we've got the staffing to fly them.
How many "large RJ" options are out there for Envoy to poach ? You allude to resources for Envoy to poach that I really think don't exist to any significant degree. Let's look at the present playing field, shall we ?

- Envoy (wholly-owned) : Shrinking significantly and to an unconfirmed level. 47 CRJ's still being transferred to PSA Airlines. Can only take an additional 6-20 options above their modest 40 aircraft E-175 commitment. Rest of fleet is obsolete and with limited lifespan, but while fuel is cheap, still usable. Once that changes and should staffing continue to fall as scheduled to unknown goals, look for these aircraft to be systematically parked. Several hundred senior captains that are also financially obsolete.

- ExpressJet : 344 jets, but only 30 of which fly for AA/U. Perhaps 275 pilots committed to AA/U ops which is likely to be phased out over time due to their strong relationship feeding competitors. Normal attrition will cover this situation and this carrier is likely to eventually end its relationship with AA in the future.

- Mesa Airlines : Strong relationship with UAL, so future unknown with AA. Only 9 options for AA flying and operates CRJ-900's which are valuable aircraft and won't be transferred to Envoy as Envoy is slated to exit the CRJ flying business, which is shrinking and whose attrition is far outpacing its recruitment.

- Republic Airlines : Retiring UAL's Q400's so that will temporarily ease staffing concerns there as attrition covers that. Almost all aircraft on order have been delivered, so no option ability to give to Envoy. Good candidate for consolidation with Envoy, which would dilute flow for junior Envoy pilots and future new-hires so as to provide equal opportunity to all of combined carriers pilots, should that occur. Could theoretically gradually transfer the Eagle E-175's to Envoy, but those would just be replacement aircraft for Envoy which wouldn't assist any flow-through engine all that much.

- SkyWest : 335 aircraft for Delta/United and only 30 for AA/U. Likely to also end relationship with AA due to STRONG relationships feeding AA competitors.

- TSA (Trans States) : only 15 aircraft for AA (11 actually from Envoy, but also obsolete E-145's with limited futures). 4 months worth of Envoy pilot attrition is all that staffs this carrier for AA. I don't foresee a long-term relationship with AA here and pilot attrition to non-regionals will provide little relief to Envoy to support any long-term flow engine. Aircraft are all obsolete 50-seaters as well with limited lifespans and no order/options commitments from AAG to fail to staff.

- Piedmont (wholly-owned) : Mostly turboprop routes, but getting some obsolete 50-seaters from.......you guessed it, Envoy. Fairly small carrier whose main question is the future of their majority turboprop route structure which likely can only be financially supportable by new turboprops. No "large RJ" options to give to Envoy.

- PSA (wholly-owned) : Still getting Envoy's 47 CRJ-700 transferred there. 35 obsolete CRJ-200 likely to be phased out as staffing becomes an issue and the larger CRJ's arrive from Envoy, very much like Envoy and their E-145's, but likely faster. 24 CRJ-900's already there and looks to become a solid CRJ-700/900 operator for AA.

- Air Wisconsin : 71 obsolete CRJ-200's. This carrier is the one most likely to be phased out or consolidated. A good bet it may be acquired by PSA, which will help staffing there and not Envoy. Easy training logistics for their present pilot cadre, should that occur.

All these AA regionals will be streamlined and the thought that Envoy will be the recipient of most of their pilots (which is what would be needed to support the aggressive AA flow you are selling...for FREE, BTW) is very unlikely as this will all take time, perhaps another 2-3 years to shake out. Legacy and LCC attrition at these carriers will siphon that hoped for pilot stream to inconsequential levels for Envoy.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
It's exactly what I said. Whomever has the pilots will get their options exercised. Whomever can't, won't.
I don't see many "options" to exercise and even those that do exist, will not likely have the pilots ANYWHERE to staff them. THAT is why I believe AA's regional network will shrink by up to half, just with virtually all larger RJ's in the 64-76 seat range.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
we're shrinking because our flow is working. Our attrition is not much greater than our hiring if you remove the flow.
We lose 35-40
20 are flows
We hire an average of 15, some months more, some months less.
You're shrinking because pilots are leaving not just to AA which is REQUIRED of AAG/Envoy by arbitration award, but also by outside attrition which is far exceeding recruitment AND the fact AA has hired from the street. The new projection from your own union indicates only 15 pilots per month will flow to AA next year on average out of 2000 pilots. That's not much of a flow-through vehicle attraction for new-hires.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
Our attrition is mostly due to flow. We are the incredible shrinking airline because 62% of all new hires at AA have come from Envoy. The sooner people realize it's working, the sooner they can get in line.
1/3 of that 62% were Letter 3 pilots also required to flow due to arbitration award and MORE IMPORTANTLY, occurred at a time when AA HAD NOT BEGUN hiring off the street. Since then, your "incredibly shrinking" airline has simply met the arbitrational requirement to transfer X number of pilots, that's all. Next year, only 175 pilots (all STILL among the arbitrationally required "824" of which perhaps 450 or so are left) will flow. At that rate, it will take almost another 2 years just to get THOSE pilots to AA (if everything runs smoothly). The PPA pilots are a totally different animal and by early 2017, it's just as likely Envoy will be consolidated with other carrier(s) completely rearranging any flow projections for present non-824 pilots there or anyone who signs on in the interim.

BTW, I was reading an article in ATW-plus dated 5/21/15. Although the title was, "American Airlines to Integrate Regional Carriers", it stated a quote from Hashimoto that AAG "is NOT interested in the next generation of regional jets, at least for now". Interpret that as you wish, but I don't think that bodes well for AAG exercising ANY options on large RJ's in the future, at least not until they are confident they can find pilots from ANYWHERE to fly them for a stable period of time. Thus, all your poaching claims don't hold water in my opinion and seem more born of hope, then fact.


*Note to forum; Since Cujo has fled, this will be directed to those here interested in considering all points-of-view whether agreed to or not.

Last edited by eaglefly; 06-19-2015 at 06:27 AM.
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 06:15 AM
  #109  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
Thrustlever moving his vag lips in 3.....2.....1
You've been on this forum for almost a decade now and I'm still waiting for a single, solitary post of yours that says anything of substance. The above is simply another one of your nocturnal farts. Those who hear it might giggle for a second or two, but then it's quickly forgotten.
Reply
Old 06-19-2015 | 06:46 AM
  #110  
N927EV's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Qualified to carry liquids through security.
Default

View PostUnread Today, 06:04 AM
Remove user from ignore listeaglefly
This message is hidden because eaglefly is on your ignore list.


It's been done for a while. Pretty soon everyone will have blocked that douche and we won't even get to read his posts through quotes!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PurdueFlyer
PSA Airlines
174
09-08-2021 08:26 AM
RJ Pilot
Envoy Airlines
78
05-13-2015 04:22 AM
Skyvector
PSA Airlines
85
05-06-2015 02:08 AM
N927EV
Regional
255
03-28-2014 06:29 AM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
69
06-15-2007 09:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices