![]() |
Originally Posted by snippercr
(Post 1909885)
First Class just models his behavior of his hero. So they are one in the same. Good Luck. |
Anyone else hear Mesa is seriously dropping the ball in DFW and may be kicked to the curb?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 1910029)
Anyone else hear Mesa is seriously dropping the ball in DFW and may be kicked to the curb?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
It's a known fact that Mesa in DFW delays flights for multiple hours and goes to great lengths to not cancel flights. This has been going on for months. Typical delays are 2+ hours on VFR days.
|
Originally Posted by Buzzlightyear
(Post 1910076)
It's a known fact that Mesa in DFW delays flights for multiple hours and goes to great lengths to not cancel flights. This has been going on for months. Typical delays are 2+ hours on VFR days.
|
Originally Posted by Shiner
(Post 1910029)
Anyone else hear Mesa is seriously dropping the ball in DFW and may be kicked to the curb?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Also, Republic's MIA flying is raising some eyebrows at AA...to say the least. Between Mesa in DFW and Republic in MIA I would say Envoy just happens to be at the right place at the right time....with the right aircraft (E-175). |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910151)
Yes, this is true. Word is getting around and apparently AA crews who commute are really up in arms about Mesa. Not really sure what the long term effect of this will be or how it will all shake out...but it looks like Mesa's DFW flying is in serious question now.
Also, Republic's MIA flying is raising some eyebrows at AA...to say the least. Between Mesa in DFW and Republic in MIA I would say Envoy just happens to be at the right place at the right time....with the right aircraft (E-175). |
Originally Posted by TurbineTime
(Post 1910160)
I'd love to know where you're MIA info is coming from. Just because you tell yourself something over and over doesn't make it true. RAH ops in MIA are expanding, not the other way. Our over water exemption is set to be finalized next month, so more routes will be starting out MIA. No hate on any envoy guys, but I don't see a RAH pull out of MIA anytime soon.
Did someone spiked that punch? |
Originally Posted by TurbineTime
(Post 1910160)
I'd love to know where you're MIA info is coming from. Just because you tell yourself something over and over doesn't make it true. RAH ops in MIA are expanding, not the other way. Our over water exemption is set to be finalized next month, so more routes will be starting out MIA. No hate on any envoy guys, but I don't see a RAH pull out of MIA anytime soon.
|
Originally Posted by JustMELit
(Post 1910170)
Same with Mesa. Don't see them leaving DFW anytime soon.
Did someone spiked that punch? |
AAG don't care about the flights or customers. Just do it cheaper than the other guy. Parker and company only care if wall street is happy. When wall street gets upset then the employees should watch out because it's never parkers fault.
|
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1910179)
I talk to MIA commuters and experience MIA ops and Republic isn't any worse then Envoy was reliability-wise. No comment on Mesa in DFW, but remember they're not big for AA there. The eventual demise of Mesa for AA isn't a bombshell that will change Envoy's major conundrums and that's commitment from AAG and demonstration that commitment will draw the flies to their honey.
|
Originally Posted by TurbineTime
(Post 1910160)
I'd love to know where you're MIA info is coming from. Just because you tell yourself something over and over doesn't make it true. RAH ops in MIA are expanding, not the other way. Our over water exemption is set to be finalized next month, so more routes will be starting out MIA. No hate on any envoy guys, but I don't see a RAH pull out of MIA anytime soon.
Again, I don't know what the long term play will be with Republic or Mesa. All I know is that both companies are cut from the same cloth. They operate on razor thin margins to undercut other airlines. This doesn't leave any wiggle room for things like actually paying their pilots. It's blowing up in Bedford's face and Mesa is probably next. Mesa takes it a step further even. Their contract with AA has them eating all the costs associated with cancelled flights...of which there are MANY for one reason or another. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910250)
It's coming from the company. It's no secret Republic is having staffing issues among other problems. It seems it has begun to affect their MIA flying. I haven't been based in MIA for almost a year but from everyone I speak to it's an issue. I have heard similar things from our DFW CPO. At Envoy we are also doing more and more MIA flying...more than I have seen in a while. Many of our July lines are a deadhead sandwich to MIA....Deadhead on AA at the beginning and end of the trip.
Again, I don't know what the long term play will be with Republic or Mesa. All I know is that both companies are cut from the same cloth. They operate on razor thin margins to undercut other airlines. This doesn't leave any wiggle room for things like actually paying their pilots. It's blowing up in Bedford's face and Mesa is probably next. Mesa takes it a step further even. Their contract with AA has them eating all the costs associated with cancelled flights...of which there are MANY for one reason or another. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910250)
It's coming from the company. It's no secret Republic is having staffing issues among other problems. It seems it has begun to affect their MIA flying. I haven't been based in MIA for almost a year but from everyone I speak to it's an issue. I have heard similar things from our DFW CPO. At Envoy we are also doing more and more MIA flying...more than I have seen in a while. Many of our July lines are a deadhead sandwich to MIA....Deadhead on AA at the beginning and end of the trip.
Again, I don't know what the long term play will be with Republic or Mesa. All I know is that both companies are cut from the same cloth. They operate on razor thin margins to undercut other airlines. This doesn't leave any wiggle room for things like actually paying their pilots. It's blowing up in Bedford's face and Mesa is probably next. Mesa takes it a step further even. Their contract with AA has them eating all the costs associated with cancelled flights...of which there are MANY for one reason or another. |
The moral to this thread is just block everyone with a dissenting view. Soon Cujo, N92 whatever, etc. Will just be able to serenade each other with nothing but milk and honey and great news for eagle.
If you can't see bad news it doesn't exist right? |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1910323)
The moral to this thread is just block everyone with a dissenting view. Soon Cujo, N92 whatever, etc. Will just be able to serenade each other with nothing but milk and honey and great news for eagle.
If you can't see bad news it doesn't exist right? If you would like you are free to hijack as many threads as you want and cry about how much you hated flying airplanes, made the wrong career choice, and go on a rant about how horrible life was with the airlines. Then you can tell us how great it is to work for mom & dad at your non-aviation job that allows you to surf the internet all day while drinking diet pepsi. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910348)
eaglefly doesn't provide "dissenting" views. If you are unable to distinguish that from what he does than you are dumber than I ever thought.
If you would like you are free to hijack as many threads as you want and cry about how much you hated flying airplanes, made the wrong career choice, and go on a rant about how horrible life was with the airlines. Then you can tell us how great it is to work for mom & dad at your non-aviation job that allows you to surf the internet all day while drinking diet pepsi. Eaglefly posts his perspective as do you, Cujo, etc. Only time will tell who was right but it's fairly obvious Cujo has an agenda. If Cujo doesn't flow he doesn't get hired anywhere. No major is going to hire an obese late 40s trouble maker so it's in his best interest to sell eagle as hard as he can until he flows to AA, after that...Good luck! |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1910376)
My advice to you is
Most of us are grown men and know exactly what we want in life and how to achieve our goals. The last thing we need is "advice" from someone who is as unsure of himself and his life as you are. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1910234)
AAG don't care about the flights or customers. Just do it cheaper than the other guy. Parker and company only care if wall street is happy. When wall street gets upset then the employees should watch out because it's never parkers fault.
|
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910399)
Stop right there....just stop. Nobody on this forum needs advice from a person who became a pilot despite the fact that he hates to fly...then proceeded to demonstrate the emotional maturity of a 12 year old girl...crying at every opportunity about how horrible his life was and unsure what step to take next.
Most of us are grown men and know exactly what we want in life and how to achieve our goals. The last thing we need is "advice" from someone who is as unsure of himself and his life as you are. |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1910376)
Eaglefly posts his perspective as do you, Cujo, etc. Only time will tell who was right but it's fairly obvious Cujo has an agenda. Im sure he wasn't a "scope salesman" yet when his livlihood still depended on it at Eagle. |
Originally Posted by RyanP
(Post 1910745)
So does Eaglefly. He wants Envoy to fail and get no new hires now that he is finally at AA. It benefits him for all the regionals to fail now that he got out, plus he is still butthurt over his long regional stint and it taking so long for him to flow. Ever heard of pulling up the ladder behind you.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1910748)
I've heard of that, but that's not what that means. Envoy failing or all regionals failing (highly unlikely) is not pulling up the ladder behind you.
Nobody but Regional lifers want the regionals to continue to erode mainline. That's not the point. |
Originally Posted by RyanP
(Post 1910768)
No, what I am talking about is EXACTLY what it means. "I got mine, I'm safe now so F everyone else below me at my old company".
Nobody but Regional lifers want the regionals to continue to erode mainline. That's not the point. |
Envoy to get 100% flow to AA? More like 0% for June. How is that possible you didn't get any June spots but PSA and PDT both sent flows over?
|
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 1910830)
Envoy to get 100% flow to AA? More like 0% for June. How is that possible you didn't get any June spots but PSA and PDT both sent flows over?
Piedmont flowed 3. PSA has NO flow. They have 5 interviews which means 2 didn't make it since only 3 are going for July.Things are even worse than originally thought. In regards to Envoy, there were never going to be flows in July. This was determined months ago. These 6 are strictly to the U.S. Air side. The AA side took the deferrals for July. No big conspiracy and nothing we didn't already know. Except you just highlighted for all to see how pathetic PSA's "flow" is. They only get 5 interviews per month which is a 25 year wait for any new hire..and now that's even worse seeing as how not all 5 even pass the interview. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910841)
NicE try...but let's get a couple of things straight.
Piedmont flowed 3. PSA has NO flow. They have 5 interviews which means 2 didn't make it since only 3 are going for July.Things are even worse than originally thought. In regards to Envoy, there were never going to be flows in July. This was determined months ago. These 6 are strictly to the U.S. Air side. The AA side took the deferrals for July. No big conspiracy and nothing we didn't already know. Except you just highlighted for all to see how pathetic PSA's "flow" is. They only get 5 interviews per month which is a 25 year wait for any new hire..and now that's even worse seeing as how not all 5 even pass the interview. |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1910846)
I'm siding with Dunkin on this one: Between PSA and PDT, there were 6 new hires. Our language says 50% of new hire classes. We should have flowed 6 minimum this month and we flowed ZERO. The company told us not too long ago to expect 5 flow for this month. We were lied to and as usual, the flow is not working as designed.
Here is the thing, and it's a bit of bollocks: Those 6 from PSA/PDT went to the US Air side. Until the two seniority lists are 100% integrated our flow language only applies to the AA side. Don't mistake that with the ability to be assigned to the US Air side once already on property. After you FLOW and are already an AA pilot you can at that point potentially go to the E190 in PHL for example. But before any of that...as far as strictly the FLOW is concerned our language only applies to the AA side. So moving forward, it was made VERY clear earlier this year that for any month AA took deferrals they would not take any Envoy flows. We love to think that a training department is capable of taking an unlimited number of new-hires per month but that isn't the case. There are only so many resources to go around....equipment, classroom space, and instructors. The AA training department is over-taxed as it is with all the new-hires, upgrades, new equipment transfers, not to mention the current issues with the 787. So it was determined, again long ago, that for any month there were deferrals they would not take any flows for that month. We were told earlier this year this would be in either June or July. The deferrals are only for the AA side, not the US Air side which is why they were still able to take the 3 from PDT and 3 from PSA. Our flow will resume as normal after July. Also, all the deferrals only have until next year to make their decisions...March or May I believe. I can't remember but it's one of those two. After that they lose their AA seniority forever and it's over. As I said before...this isn't any big conspiracy and we were told months ago how this would play out. I just wish the Sam or Ray or somebody would nip this one in the bud before it festers any further. I know people like Spanier and Flynn would just add fuel to the fire and spin this thing even further out of control...so I'm not expecting anything out of those two. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910841)
NicE try...but let's get a couple of things straight.
Piedmont flowed 3. PSA has NO flow. They have 5 interviews which means 2 didn't make it since only 3 are going for July.Things are even worse than originally thought. |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910399)
Stop right there....just stop. Nobody on this forum needs advice from a person who became a pilot despite the fact that he hates to fly...then proceeded to demonstrate the emotional maturity of a 12 year old girl...crying at every opportunity about how horrible his life was and unsure what step to take next.
Most of us are grown men and know exactly what we want in life and how to achieve our goals. The last thing we need is "advice" from someone who is as unsure of himself and his life as you are. |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1910846)
I'm siding with Dunkin on this one: Between PSA and PDT, there were 6 new hires. Our language says 50% of new hire classes. We should have flowed 6 minimum this month and we flowed ZERO. The company told us not too long ago to expect 5 flow for this month. We were lied to and as usual, the flow is not working as designed.
|
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 1910872)
PSA is 4 a month. With one guy turning it down last minute again. Still get 3, but don't mislead with how it happened. Same story as usual on why we didn't send the full number.
Thanks to DC Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus
(Post 1910897)
Thanks to DC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 1910872)
PSA is 4 a month. With one guy turning it down last minute again. Still get 3, but don't mislead with how it happened. Same story as usual on why we didn't send the full number.
I thought your SSP was supposed to get better, not worse. Oh well...there's always Frontier. Good luck! |
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1911036)
PSA is down to 4 interviews a month from 5? That means your wait to interview is 31 years instead of 25! :eek::eek:
I thought your SSP was supposed to get better, not worse. Oh well...there's always Frontier. Good luck! |
You interview and if pass you get a job offer.
|
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1911036)
PSA is down to 4 interviews a month from 5? That means your wait to interview is 31 years instead of 25! :eek::eek:
I thought your SSP was supposed to get better, not worse. Oh well...there's always Frontier. Good luck! |
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 1911139)
For someone always saying they are all about facts, your lack of information about PSA is astounding. It was never 5, it's always been 4. And to this day there is only one person who was ever actually denied the job that didn't tell them straight up no. I don't know where you keep getting this whole people aren't passing the interview thing from. SSP negotiations are in their final stage before they will be shown to the pilot group as well. Why don't you stop trying to put PSA down to the public with false information and just wish the best for pilots in general. Watching you guys pray for republics fall and constantly making up false claims about PSA is really getting old. I'm not talking about the whole envoy pilot group either, I'm talking specifically about you and a few more of your crew on here.
|
Originally Posted by Skyvector
(Post 1910868)
No arguments with you there...the company lies. As every airline lies...it's not unique to AA/US Airways.
Here is the thing, and it's a bit of bollocks: Those 6 from PSA/PDT went to the US Air side. Until the two seniority lists are 100% integrated our flow language only applies to the AA side. Don't mistake that with the ability to be assigned to the US Air side once already on property. After you FLOW and are already an AA pilot you can at that point potentially go to the E190 in PHL for example. But before any of that...as far as strictly the FLOW is concerned our language only applies to the AA side. So moving forward, it was made VERY clear earlier this year that for any month AA took deferrals they would not take any Envoy flows. We love to think that a training department is capable of taking an unlimited number of new-hires per month but that isn't the case. There are only so many resources to go around....equipment, classroom space, and instructors. The AA training department is over-taxed as it is with all the new-hires, upgrades, new equipment transfers, not to mention the current issues with the 787. So it was determined, again long ago, that for any month there were deferrals they would not take any flows for that month. We were told earlier this year this would be in either June or July. The deferrals are only for the AA side, not the US Air side which is why they were still able to take the 3 from PDT and 3 from PSA. Our flow will resume as normal after July. Also, all the deferrals only have until next year to make their decisions...March or May I believe. I can't remember but it's one of those two. After that they lose their AA seniority forever and it's over. As I said before...this isn't any big conspiracy and we were told months ago how this would play out. I just wish the Sam or Ray or somebody would nip this one in the bud before it festers any further. I know people like Spanier and Flynn would just add fuel to the fire and spin this thing even further out of control...so I'm not expecting anything out of those two. They've been sending PDT & PSA to LUS and ENY to LAA as a practice for all these months, and when there were no LAA slots they didn't take our 5. It's being addressed to prevent future issues as well. Once the SLI is done it should become a non issue. On a personal note.... I wouldn't be surprised if a certain person at AA HR didn't do it on purpose; no way to prove it of course though. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands