![]() |
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 1963831)
Exactly. ^^^
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1962911)
company wants satellite base-
miami e145 cover republic. N.Y. crj to cover TSA and republic DFW CRJ to cover aspen since faa told psa to pi ss up a rope. LAX E175 for the compass flying coming back per vp of flt ops. phl e175 because the pdt e145 wont work envoy will only have two concrete bases dfw and ord, pilots from satellite bases must show up in one of these two for disciplinary issues. |
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1963843)
So, what your saying is, mgmt played you like a fiddle. Your now recovering the flying you lost because you took the concessions they wanted?
|
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1963843)
So, what your saying is, mgmt played you like a fiddle. Your now recovering the flying you lost because you took the concessions they wanted?
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1962911)
DFW CRJ to cover aspen since faa told psa to pi ss up a rope.
If you have dealt with the FAA have as long as you claim to have you would know that they are the biggest CYAs ever. PSA mgmt is up to their eyeballs now in projects, like ipads, constant rate descents from non-precisions and LPV approaches. Acknowledging that a company is task saturated in projects and allowing your other company to continue on, is not telling them to pi ss up a rope. Regarding the FAA, their chief concern is and always will be paper work. Manuals, procedures, training documentation, checking the boxes, if you will. |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 1963858)
Nope, because others cannot do the flying and we are overstaffed.
Good Luck! |
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1963864)
Regarding the FAA, their chief concern is and always will be paper work. Manuals, procedures, training documentation, checking the boxes, if you will.
Good Luck! |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1963834)
For any consolidation of wholly-owned AAG regional pilot groups, there can really be no special treatment for some vs. others and all new contractual provisions would have to apply to all. Thus, once an SLI occurred, all pilots would have a flow benefit based on their NEW seniority and not the fact they once had X expectations based on a former CBA, ....
Your entire post is full of "Wat!?!" but this stands out. Your opinion is so full of suppositions I don't even know where to start. Are you seeking to apply the McCaskill-Bond act to this situation? Don't forget it works both ways and the Act has never had to deal with an arbitrated seniority award before, it is unprecedented and in all likelihood the 824 would remain unchanged. Currently airlines facing SLI post-Act are using fences, DOH and blending techniques to get SLI to work. Like UAL/CAL. Not perfect, but the Act was designed to prevent Staple And Furlough thanks to AA's SOP of treating acquisitions like crap, in this case the precipitating event was the TWA buyout. They can spout off "based on expected career progression" all they want, but there is abso-f'n-lutely no way a 2 year FO in upgrade class is going to leap ahead of a 10 year FO 25 numbers away from upgrade at a stagnating airline. This has not happened at any airline post-Act. This is why SLI's are quietly done by the company and unions during negotiations, and they expressly try to prevent situations like this because neither want to be mired in lawsuits and grievances for the next decade. If anything, each respective regional would hold on to their own flow and be awarded flow opportunities based on their previous seniority list (unless contractually provided, then it's all up for negotiation in a new CBA) while bidding and combined list seniority would have fences and/or some sort of blending as needed. |
October classes
Anyone get a call for the early October class yet? If so, when is the class? Thanks
|
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 1963893)
Your entire post is full of "Wat!?!" but this stands out. Your opinion is so full of suppositions I don't even know where to start. Are you seeking to apply the McCaskill-Bond act to this situation? Don't forget it works both ways and the Act has never had to deal with an arbitrated seniority award before, it is unprecedented and in all likelihood the 824 would remain unchanged.
You REALLY should do more due diligence when making an argument. :cool:
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 1963893)
Currently airlines facing SLI post-Act are using fences, DOH and blending techniques to get SLI to work. Like UAL/CAL. Not perfect, but the Act was designed to prevent Staple And Furlough thanks to AA's SOP of treating acquisitions like crap, in this case the precipitating event was the TWA buyout.
They can spout off "based on expected career progression" all they want, but there is abso-f'n-lutely no way a 2 year FO in upgrade class is going to leap ahead of a 10 year FO 25 numbers away from upgrade at a stagnating airline. This has not happened at any airline post-Act. This is why SLI's are quietly done by the company and unions during negotiations, and they expressly try to prevent situations like this because neither want to be mired in lawsuits and grievances for the next decade. If anything, each respective regional would hold on to their own flow and be awarded flow opportunities based on their previous seniority list (unless contractually provided, then it's all up for negotiation in a new CBA) while bidding and combined list seniority would have fences and/or some sort of blending as needed. In fact, Envoy ALPA has ALREADY cried uncle since their initial hard stand of no concessions and in fact, their new Comm chair is leading the "cooperate and graduate" parade only in reverse for Envoy pilots to get a do-over. I think you are really quite naïve in considering the future. Hundreds, if not thousands of regional pilots before you have both made the same mistake and failed to learn from the past and so in all likelihood will you take your seat in that stadium when the time comes. I'll be the guy over by the popcorn stand munching away and sipping a beer when that occurs. ;) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands