Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
How Envoy's 5.5 Year Flowthrough Works >

How Envoy's 5.5 Year Flowthrough Works

Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

How Envoy's 5.5 Year Flowthrough Works

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2016 | 05:22 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
But you can be absolutely certain that more pilots will "flow" from the non-WOs regionals (while they last) than the majors will scavange from their own WO'ed regionals. In fact, you can absolutely bet the entire farm on it. Parker and Anderson are not about to create a staffing problems at their WO'ed regionals when they can do so among the non-WO'ed regionals.
This is exactly what I mean by people stating with CERTAIN fact that things won't materialize as advertised. If you're so smart and have such an insight into the inner workings of the airline industry, then why are you a lowely regional pilot rather then a financial or market analyst at one of the big 3?

We're all entitled to our opinions...yours is just much harder to listen to it when you state it as a fact. It comes across as grasping at straws in a feeble attempt to get others to listen to what you have to say.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 05:25 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Rubbish.

Anyone flying 121 today will be at a major within the next decade. Won't matter where one is working right now.

Demographics and the rate of population growth world-wide alone guarantee it, to say noting of other relevant factors.

"Flow" is nothing more than a carrot to lure new hires in lieu of hard cash today. Oh sure, some have to flow. Otherwise the carrot won't work.

But you can be absolutely certain that more pilots will "flow" from the non-WOs regionals (while they last) than the majors will scavange from their own WO'ed regionals. In fact, you can absolutely bet the entire farm on it. Parker and Anderson are not about to create a staffing problems at their WO'ed regionals when they can do so among the non-WO'ed regionals.
That's how I see it. The only way around that I can see is if wholly owned carriers become a new rung on the ladder - ie American and Delta force Non wholly owned pilots to work for their feed in order to be hired at mainline. In other words, RAH and SkyWest pilots can't get to mainline delta or American unless they take a job at a wholly owned regional. Not today obviously but maybe that is in the future.

Again, I just don't see mainline destroying their own feed when there are other viable tasteless options at their disposal.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 05:27 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Default

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84

why are you a lowely regional pilot rather then a financial or market analyst at one of the big 3?
Actually, I was...before I retired early, then took up flying to scratch a life-long itch.

I don't fly because I have to. That's for suckers. I tell any youngster who will listen....get a degree in finance and go to Wall St. Earn an early retirement, THEN go do what you really want to do in life.

Most won't listen....much less understand simple logic.

Btw, "lowely" is spelled "lowly". But I'm sure you knew that.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 05:46 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Actually, I was...before I retired early, then took up flying to scratch a life-long itch.

I don't fly because I have to. That's for suckers. I tell any youngster who will listen....get a degree in finance and go to Wall St. Earn an early retirement, THEN go do what you really want to do in life.

Most won't listen....much less understand simple logic.

Btw, "lowely" is spelled "lowly". But I'm sure you knew that.
Yeah I'm not too concerned with how "lowly" is spelt but thanks for trying to make yourself sound smarter...you're doing GREAT!

So which airline did you work for and do you have any actual insight into what strategy they're taking in regards to their WO's and other regional lift providers? Or is what you're saying all opinion? (stated as fact, of course)
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 06:25 PM
  #45  
Jersdawg's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Rubbish.

Anyone flying 121 today will be at a major within the next decade. Won't matter where one is working right now.

Demographics and the rate of population growth world-wide alone guarantee it, to say noting of other relevant factors.

"Flow" is nothing more than a carrot to lure new hires in lieu of hard cash today. Oh sure, some have to flow. Otherwise the carrot won't work.

But you can be absolutely certain that more pilots will "flow" from the non-WOs regionals (while they last) than the majors will scavange from their own WO'ed regionals. In fact, you can absolutely bet the entire farm on it. Parker and Anderson are not about to create a staffing problems at their WO'ed regionals when they can do so among the non-WO'ed regionals.
*scavenge

But I'm sure you knew that.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 06:29 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GodIsGood
Here are some conservative flowthrough numbers for pilots thinking about coming to Envoy and for all the pilots out there who say the flowthrough will not work.
Let’s start with some basics about Envoy and the flow. Envoy currently has 1950 pilots on the seniority list. The top 300 have already bypassed the flow many many times and will retire from Envoy. Let’s conservatively make it 250. That means a new-hire has 1700 pilots to get through before he/she flows. Envoy currently has 5-10 pilots leaving every month in addition to the flow, most of which are senior FOs and junior CAs. Obviously, the more senior you become at Envoy, the less of those 5-10 a month leaving help you move up. We will conservatively use 0 attrition to other airlines in our calculation. The pilots flowing to AA are currently flowing at a rate of 30 a month. Yes, AA recalls could slow that down for 2 or 3 months this year, but that is all. We will add that to the final calculation.
Here is the flowthrough contract broken down. The 824 pilots are currently flowing at a rate of 50% of the new hire positions at AA. That can be metered down to 30, and it is. After the 824 pilots flow, it drops to a 35% flow rate. But that bumps back up to 50% when Envoy receives the 40th E-175. That happens to coincide at the time their 824th pilot flows. So, in essence, the flow rate stays at 50% but metered to 25 from the last of the 824 till the pilots hired after October 11, 2011. Then it drops to 35% until the DOS (Date of Signing) pilots. If American continues to hire only 60 a month, then 35% is 21 per month flowing to AA. Then we get to the DOS pilots. The pilots hired after December 2014 will flow at a rate of about 15 pilots per month.
The most recent Envoy pilot awarded to flow has a seniority number of 415. The last pilot hired before October 11, 2011 has a seniority number of 1675. The difference between them is 1260 pilots. If you take a very conservative 25 a month for this entire group, it will take 4 years, 2 months to get to the last of the 10/11/2011 pilots.
The last pilot hired in December 2014 (DOS) has a seniority of 1849. To get to that pilot, it will take another 8.2 months, using 21 per month.
From the DOS pilot to the most recent new-hire is 101 pilots. At 15 a month, it will take 6.7 months.
Add all these groups up and you get 5 years 5 months to flow for a new-hire hired today. As promised, add 2-3 months for the AA recalls and you are at 5 years 8 months. And that is without considering any attrition to other airlines which, like I stated before, is about 5-10 a month. Take that into consideration, and you will be well below a 5 year flow.
These are just the straight numbers and facts on the conservative side. How’s that for “lies” and a “used car salesman” pitch. Obviously we could have a terrorist attack or a major economic collapse or the retirement age could be changed, but no airline pilot would be in a good situation if that happened. I would rather be at a WO airline that could weather the storm.
For those of you who struggle with numbers and projections, you don’t use current reserve, upgrade, or flow to decide which airline you should go to. You need to look at what those times will be for you hired today. Envoy’s most junior reserve, upgrade, and flow are 22 months, 8 years, and 16.5 years respectively, but those pilots went through 9/11, age 65, 2008, and the AMR bankruptcy.
This is still nothing but the most optimistic projections that span over half a decade. 9/11 wasn't anticipated, but it happened. Age 65 wasn't anticipated, but it happened. AMR's BK wasn't anticipated, but it happened. Same with the Gulf War, SARS or any number of other negative factors impacting this historically cyclical industry in the past. Envoy's flow is a risky primary reason to select it solely for that reason and is ripe to be a foundation for disappointment if it is.

Caveat Emptor.

While your polishing rosy hypothetical laurels about Envoy's future flow, how about the 2.5 year upgrade still being advertised ? If 205 F/O's upgrade in 2016, what's the engine to upgrade the other 2/3 to 3/4 or upwards of 700 pilots over the following 18 months ? Envoy will need perhaps 900 pilots over the next 2.5 years just to maintain the flow projections above or Envoy shrinks, requires less captains and is in jeopardy of an inability to provide its lift obligations to AAG. This alone could jeopardize the flow in addition to outside forces unanticipated like so many others in the past. If Envoy claims its situation is now so perilous that releasing 5 more measly F/O's in March to live up to its advertising promises will be too destabilizing (especially with present staffing), imagine what REAL geopolitical or economic speed bumps will result in there.

Hey, it's a nice pitch.........really. But, I think it's founded on "irrational exuberance" concerning the flow and "unconnected dots" regarding the upgrade. I think considering the reality of the number of pilots available now and especially over the next few years, Envoy is in as grave a situation as any other regional in meeting its obligations and the flow through is a by-product dependent on that reality.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 07:05 PM
  #47  
FlameNSky's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt

Anyone flying 121 today will be at a major within the next decade. Won't matter where one is working right now.
If you are right, then an envoy pilot will get hired off the street just like everyone else so it won't matter. If you are wrong and you are at GoJets, RAH, SkyWest etc... it will be too late. I'm just saying an "Ace in the Hole" is better than having nothing at all.


Can you guarantee that between now and your "Guaranteed Off the Street Mainline Job Offer" that you won't have a bad day and fail a checkride, or be involved in an aviation accident or incident? I know of more than a few really good pilots that got involved in a bad situation, not entirely their fault but now have FAA Action on their history. What if your wife/girlfriend goes crazy, makes wild accusations against you and now you have restraining order to explain during your Delta Interview. Lots of things can happen to the flow but there are also lots of things that can happen to make you wish you had it.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 07:19 PM
  #48  
FlameNSky's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
This is still nothing but the most optimistic projections that span over half a decade. 9/11 wasn't anticipated, but it happened. Age 65 wasn't anticipated, but it happened. AMR's BK wasn't anticipated, but it happened. Same with the Gulf War, SARS or any number of other negative factors impacting this historically cyclical industry in the past. Envoy's flow is a risky primary reason to select it solely for that reason and is ripe to be a foundation for disappointment if it is.

Caveat Emptor.

While your polishing rosy hypothetical laurels about Envoy's future flow, how about the 2.5 year upgrade still being advertised ? If 205 F/O's upgrade in 2016, what's the engine to upgrade the other 2/3 to 3/4 or upwards of 700 pilots over the following 18 months ? Envoy will need perhaps 900 pilots over the next 2.5 years just to maintain the flow projections above or Envoy shrinks, requires less captains and is in jeopardy of an inability to provide its lift obligations to AAG. This alone could jeopardize the flow in addition to outside forces unanticipated like so many others in the past. If Envoy claims its situation is now so perilous that releasing 5 more measly F/O's in March to live up to its advertising promises will be too destabilizing (especially with present staffing), imagine what REAL geopolitical or economic speed bumps will result in there.

Hey, it's a nice pitch.........really. But, I think it's founded on "irrational exuberance" concerning the flow and "unconnected dots" regarding the upgrade. I think considering the reality of the number of pilots available now and especially over the next few years, Envoy is in as grave a situation as any other regional in meeting its obligations and the flow through is a by-product dependent on that reality.
For those of you just now joining us, it took eaglefly over 20 years to FLOW, that is why he has become the bitter old man you see today.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 09:17 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Violin on the Envoy-tanic
Default

Originally Posted by FlameNSky
For those of you just now joining us, it took eaglefly over 20 years to FLOW, that is why he has become the bitter old man you see today.
And I bet he was told he'd be at American in five years too. Funny how history repeats itself.
Reply
Old 03-17-2016 | 09:53 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Rubbish.

Anyone flying 121 today will be at a major within the next decade. Won't matter where one is working right now.
You know, we all said this at the regionals 10 years ago too right? Yet we are still stuck here. dhit happens. Still haven't gotten that legacy interview call despite a perfect training record, turbine PIC, 4 type ratings, job fairs, 3.9 GPA, volunteering and playing all the HR games. Pretty glad to have this so called "useless" flow through to fall back on now, as jumping through all the other hoops isn't working for thousands of us regional Captains.

New hires will realize one day years from now that getting that Legacy call isn't as easy as they once thought. Why listen to people with experience though? New hires obviously know better than we do on how this industry works.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CloudSailor
FedEx
96
10-17-2015 07:20 AM
hoodabundy
United
219
08-18-2013 08:52 PM
AAflyer
Major
24
01-23-2007 12:39 PM
cloudkicker1981
Hiring News
27
10-22-2006 12:35 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices