Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
63 cancels - 50 for crew >

63 cancels - 50 for crew

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

63 cancels - 50 for crew

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2019 | 04:46 AM
  #211  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Posted today on another thread:
There is no pilot shortage at mainline and given the fact that all three have developed street to hero programs to fill any voids they may have, but none of them have created any hard flows from their regionals other than AA. That shows they don’t have much interest in taking away pilots from their regional partners.

If you’re going to cite propaganda you should post the original source. This is old and essentially means nothing. All those stats are volunteer collected by pilots within the union. We have guys leaving constantly just going off the seniority list that no one knows anything about. It’s a pure fact that every month we have an excessive amount of guys being swept up by JB 3-4 years in and a lot from the right seat. LCC’s (primarily spirit) are given offers to our guys prior to one year on property. Mainline? Anywhere from 3-6 years LARGELY depending on your personal background and I’m not talking about military. We had a guy leave to United as an FO because of specific masters degree he held. This has been said a thousand times on these boards, it ain’t the airline name. You want a “guaranteed” class date with a major? 8-10 flow at AA’s feeds. Ask EDV how many people go Delta and even better how long they take....good joke.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 06:16 AM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:22 AM
  #213  
airlinepilot50's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KCaviator
Nut up, or shut the ****** up. Post your source where UA said ExpressJet will be their 175 platform going forward.

YOU HAVN’T EVEN OPERATED A SINGLE 175 FLIGHT!

Also, post your source on the expiration of the CPA’s for YX’s UA contracts. Nut up, or shut the ****** up.
The E175 sim arrived on property last week. The E175 is the most profitable regional jet, w/UA owning 50% of XJT, they will bring as many E175s on property as they can. Why would UA want other regionals to make money on this profitable a/c? Republic and Mesa FOs will leave to XJT once they notice our upgrade time drops to less than two years with help from United taking back the E175s from Republic and Mesa. Another option for XJT to grow the E175 would be from UA replacing the CRJ 700s with the E175SC (70 seat configuration).
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:30 AM
  #214  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch
You appear to be lacking in elementary economic skills. UA has EIGHT regional feeds. Why is that? Do I really need to explain?

In a perfect world, mainline would give regionals with the best performance the flying. You know because cancelled flights angers customers which potentially choose to take their business elesewhere which translates to lost profits for the big wigs. Simple. Ask Delta how it’s done!

Not jealousy, but lots of frustration when the sub par guys that still can’t prove themselves get the flying contracts. UA will always be cheap and it’ll catch up.
Sometimes I can’t fathom the lack of reason. Here’s some thought provoking items for you:

Express Jet has a decent contract. They can attract pilots. They will staff the flying. They are not launching aircraft at an unreasonable rate. United owns them via the holding company. They don’t want or expect them to fail. Up until just recently their major 175 provider Mesa, where I work, couldn’t staff their 175 flying. This is a hedge bet by United. As XJT gets their 175 program running they can take airplanes from Mesa. United owns the majority of the Mesa fleet.
The only interesting thing is Mesa just hired a United guy into an executive position managing the United flying. But I’m telling you XJT is in an excellent position and I don’t think that should bother anybody.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:31 AM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FollowMe
I see this as nothing more than a market ploy. Giving percentages of people that left in the last few years says nothing about number. This chart would be the same if 20 people or 500 people move on a year.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:34 AM
  #216  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
The E175 sim arrived on property last week. The E175 is the most profitable regional jet, w/UA owning 50% of XJT, they will bring as many E175s on property as they can. Why would UA want other regionals to make money on this profitable a/c? Republic and Mesa FOs will leave to XJT once they notice our upgrade time drops to less than two years with help from United taking back the E175s from Republic and Mesa. Another option for XJT to grow the E175 would be from UA replacing the CRJ 700s with the E175SC (70 seat configuration).
I’d just give up. Denial is powerful.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:35 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: C172 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
The E175 sim arrived on property last week. The E175 is the most profitable regional jet, w/UA owning 50% of XJT, they will bring as many E175s on property as they can. Why would UA want other regionals to make money on this profitable a/c? Republic and Mesa FOs will leave to XJT once they notice our upgrade time drops to less than two years with help from United taking back the E175s from Republic and Mesa. Another option for XJT to grow the E175 would be from UA replacing the CRJ 700s with the E175SC (70 seat configuration).
Aside from the sim, these are not facts. These are opinions. Learn the difference idiot.

And again, since you think UA is going to take 175s from YX (which at most could only be 12), post the details of the current CPA for those aircraft.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:38 AM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: C172 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Hou757
Sorry to pop your bubble but what he posted is true. Accept the facts KC.
You, also, need to learn the difference between facts and opinions. “Facts” are much different than a bottom feeders “opinion” about what is going to happen at said bottom feeder.

Just because home boy is a keyboard warrior in his mommy’s basement doesn’t make it a fact.
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:42 AM
  #219  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by KCaviator
You, also, need to learn the difference between facts and opinions. “Facts” are much different than a bottom feeders “opinion” about what is going to happen at said bottom feeder.

Just because home boy is a keyboard warrior in his mommy’s basement doesn’t make it a fact.
Dude. You are leaning when you walk because of that huge chip on your shoulder. It’s gonna stress your heart then you’ll be no good to anybody. Chill. What’s it matter? What happens will happen. What’s your investment here?
Reply
Old 03-24-2019 | 07:43 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
I see this as nothing more than a market ploy. Giving percentages of people that left in the last few years says nothing about number. This chart would be the same if 20 people or 500 people move on a year.
2018 attrition was more than 250, more than half of which went to DL/UA/AA/SWA. LCC/ACMI made up only 18%.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevjets
United
23
05-14-2017 07:43 PM
Fish on
Delta
154
07-19-2015 04:48 PM
satpak77
Major
21
02-24-2015 12:15 PM
bottoms up
United
72
01-18-2014 06:20 AM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
5
05-15-2011 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices