Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

63 cancels - 50 for crew

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2019, 06:22 AM
  #361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 592
Default

Out of base, I think reserves can pick up. There's a lot of restrictions here on reserves picking up extra work, though. It has to be red flag AND there has to be 48 hours between the end of what you pick up and the start of your next reserve period. If scheduling is desperate, they may bend that.

ERJs coming from the desert, I doubt any. The priority is staffing the 175 which we'll just barely be able to do as it is.
Arliss is offline  
Old 04-25-2019, 06:24 AM
  #362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: It's a plane and it's a seat
Posts: 951
Default

Originally Posted by Erj135dude View Post
How many more new hires until XJT starts getting ERJs back for service from Kingman or wherever they're storaged ?
I was told by 6/1 we will supposedly be back to 100 ERJ (replacing the CRJ). We have 105 aircraft in the system but only utilize 85. From an OE standpoint we have more students then LCP’s.
flynd94 is offline  
Old 04-25-2019, 10:31 AM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Default

A little less on the side of speculation and more on facts and personal experience.

The union stated that the block hours system-wide in April were significantly less than December and January. The company announce a major reduction in block hours since the beginning of the year as well. The last 2 four day trips I’ve flown have had at least 50% of the legs canceled. Not because of weather but because of no crew. In no way am I complaining about getting to go home early and work less for the same pay.

What’s my point? While the company is out and about bragging about 175s and door trainers, they are leaving the door open for people to leave still in pretty significant numbers. Although I’m sure there’s more to these massive cancelation numbers, it’s definitely not attributed to something as simple as that original excuse they came up with last year. Which was United giving them flying they couldn’t do. I was told, and there was an announcement from GW, that they were no longer doing that.

XJTs got some issues they need to iron out if they want to be United’s amazing go-to customer.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 04-25-2019, 03:45 PM
  #364  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Default

As long as the people leaving have four stripes, that’s exactly what XJT needs. Stagnation has killed that place. If the upgrade becomes reasonably low, y’all will be fine.
PhantomHawk is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 04:24 AM
  #365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by SpringLanding View Post
Part of this equation that is rarely mentioned here : the amount of flights issued by united for Expressjet to cover. They knowingly continuously assign many more flights than Expressjet can staff or recommends assigning. They assign it anyway knowing full well a good number will be cancelled.
Also, Expressjet cancels flights well in advance because of crew and this reason. It's not like the company is expecting to staff the flight, and then the day of, the pilots walked out and now the company is failing.
It is my understanding that United builds schedules/assigns flying in coordination with their partners. They ask the airline if they can handle this or that flying. I don't believe it is just assigned willy-nilly.

XJT has a new CEO. At his previous airline there was an absolute refusal to tell United we can't handle the projected growth rates that were on some power point presentation. It was only after a period of near implosion that scheduled flying was adjusted to what we could actually do. We have been in the top half of performance since that adjustment, but at a fraction of the growth that UAL wanted.

Sources who had a better vantage point than I tell me that the CEO even resisted the degree of cutbacks. He still wanted to operate at the absolute limit/edge of what was possible.
Admittedly all this is repeating hearsay. I have no direct knowledge of the dealings with UAL.

If there is some degree of truth to the above, it appears he hasn't changed his approach to things.
MaxQ is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 05:00 AM
  #366  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Here’s the rub.
If you have too much flying it means little time on reserve, tons of flying while on reserve, and faster upgrade times. Yeah, the latter has not happened yet due to training bottlenecks as they try to train new hires and field the -175, but I think you will see substantially lower upgrade times in the near future.
“Right size” flying equals reserve, little flying on reserve and longer upgrade times. That was part of the problem with XJT for so long. Management would not take on flying they knew we couldn’t handle but other airlines would.
Blackhawk is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 08:08 AM
  #367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk View Post
That was part of the problem with XJT for so long. Management would not take on flying they knew we couldn’t handle but other airlines would.
Not sure which side or timeframe you’re talking about.

Multiple times XJT took on more UAX block hours without being anywhere staffed enough to handle it. As well as tried to fly the schedules handed down, etc.

At that time, they’d just suck it up and have pi$$ poor performance and taking the penalties while the other UAX carriers had the balls to push back on UAL for relief when it got to hard.
John Carr is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 08:37 AM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Not sure which side or timeframe you’re talking about.

Multiple times XJT took on more UAX block hours without being anywhere staffed enough to handle it. As well as tried to fly the schedules handed down, etc.

At that time, they’d just suck it up and have pi$$ poor performance and taking the penalties while the other UAX carriers had the balls to push back on UAL for relief when it got to hard.
Delta side it was the opposite.
Blackhawk is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 09:10 AM
  #369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk View Post
Delta side it was the opposite.
The legacy of CA blue jeans and King Tutt.

But the ASA side wasn’t without their own issues, it remember a couple summers that were awful on that side.

From what I hear, XJT/UAX is operating pretty much status quo since 2008 in many regards.

Doesn’t matter if it’s pre-SKW buy of Mana spin off.
John Carr is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 09:49 AM
  #370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
The legacy of CA blue jeans and King Tutt.

But the ASA side wasn’t without their own issues, it remember a couple summers that were awful on that side.

From what I hear, XJT/UAX is operating pretty much status quo since 2008 in many regards.

Doesn’t matter if it’s pre-SKW buy of Mana spin off.
Oh, I’m not saying it was perfect by any means.
Blackhawk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevjets
United
23
05-14-2017 07:43 PM
Fish on
Delta
153
07-19-2015 04:48 PM
satpak77
Major
21
02-24-2015 12:15 PM
bottoms up
United
72
01-18-2014 06:20 AM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
5
05-15-2011 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices