Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

XJT ALPA CPP update.

Old 07-08-2019 | 09:29 AM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 144
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
So, UA and the company string along the pilot group for years about a “new and improved” CPP, with Greg Woolley telling people to their face in crew rooms that a flow was “imminent”, and UA rolls out this POS?

What a slap in the face to the hard working folks that stuck it out and tried to make XJT a better place. What a dumpster fire that joint has turned into.
Wooley telling people that a flow is imminent? haha shocking he would say something like that to people... if I was in a casino right now and I had to bet if Xjt would get a flow or not, I would put every penny I had on Xjt not getting a flow. Wooley used to be one of us, it's amazing what a management position will do to you LOL
Reply
Old 07-08-2019 | 09:38 AM
  #22  
drywhitetoast's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 568
Likes: 29
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by Bluesteal
Wooley telling people that a flow is imminent? haha shocking he would say something like that to people... if I was in a casino right now and I had to bet if Xjt would get a flow or not, I would put every penny I had on Xjt not getting a flow. Wooley used to be one of us, it's amazing what a management position will do to you LOL
I guess you could say he pulled the Wooley over the pilot group's eyes.
Reply
Old 07-08-2019 | 12:54 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

I once witness him tell someone on a rolled day that the company was not rolling any days at the moment. Boy was he surprised! Sometimes I think he's just as in the dark as the rest of us...
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 07:20 PM
  #24  
4 Stripes
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

I've heard the "flow" contract is already signed and sitting in a drawer somewhere. It's a matter of time before it's announced but XJT has to have its personnel in place to make it work. They first need to fully staff XJT before they can start flowing pilots to United. What interest would United have in buying ownership in XJT is they weren't going to utilize the XJT pilot pipeline?
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 09:20 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by georgiaflyer
I've heard the "flow" contract is already signed and sitting in a drawer somewhere. It's a matter of time before it's announced but XJT has to have its personnel in place to make it work. They first need to fully staff XJT before they can start flowing pilots to United. What interest would United have in buying ownership in XJT is they weren't going to utilize the XJT pilot pipeline?
Did you hear that from a guy that had someone convinced he was capable of performing medical procedures on a kitchen table?

As well as a host of other tall tales?
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 09:35 PM
  #26  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
If I’m reading the “dependability” list right, a doctors note does not exempt a sick call from the 4 in 12 with respect to the CPP. Only FMLA.

A doctors note only excuses you from disciplinary action from the company. Am I understanding this incorrectly?
That is an interesting one to explain. So united may wish to remove you from a program for attendance for an attendance event that is under protected status at your current employer? I hope someone puts out some clarification for that. I have a lawyer friend who is dying to take a whiff of that.
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 06:49 AM
  #27  
andili61's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Flaps & Ldg Gear Executive Director
Default

Originally Posted by georgiaflyer
I've heard the "flow" contract is already signed and sitting in a drawer somewhere. It's a matter of time before it's announced but XJT has to have its personnel in place to make it work. They first need to fully staff XJT before they can start flowing pilots to United. What interest would United have in buying ownership in XJT is they weren't going to utilize the XJT pilot pipeline?
So United only wants to offer a flow when we're fat on pilots. If you see the company directory there are only 650 active pilots between captains and FO's. 179 captains and FO's on "L" status. Finally, people hired this year, or with seniority starting January 2019 including those already flying plus new hires on training are 224. We should be 325 pilots hired in 2019 by now. So if XJT wants to fly 125 ERJ's 145, and 25 175's we need solid 1500 pilots. Were are barely able to staff 70 airplanes as it is. I always thought that the flow plan, if it's true, would be to attract pilots in a cheaply manner, otherwise why would United have a flow in place?
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 07:18 AM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 144
Likes: 6
Default

There is no need for a flow... The whipsaw will always continue in the regional industry. In about a month or so Ual will announce another 40 175's going to XJT, Mesa contract will expire shifting planes over to Xjt and the bottom half of Mesa seniority list to leave Mesa for XJT, we are our own worst enemy. The whipsaw will always remain! Sad, but true.
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 09:23 AM
  #29  
DBono's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Whole lotta sitting
Default

Originally Posted by Bluesteal
There is no need for a flow... The whipsaw will always continue in the regional industry. In about a month or so Ual will announce another 40 175's going to XJT, Mesa contract will expire shifting planes over to Xjt and the bottom half of Mesa seniority list to leave Mesa for XJT, we are our own worst enemy. The whipsaw will always remain! Sad, but true.
I think you're right about the long term strategy, but I think it will take a long time to play out. The thing Mesa has that XJT doesn't is a large stable of 175 pilots who are ready to fly tomorrow. It's going to take a long time for XJT to hire and train enough people to staff the 30 175's that are coming available for re-assignment now/soon. Mesa owns 18 of the 175's they are flying for UA out of IAH. 12 of the others have agreements in place through Dec 2023. So there are 30 that could be considered "in play" in the near term. Considering that more new 175's at XJT might just be replacing large CRJs from the UA fleet, I don't think the Mesa 175's are going anywhere soon, assuming Mesa can staff them.

Last edited by DBono; 07-10-2019 at 09:25 AM. Reason: clarifying
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 09:59 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andili61
So United only wants to offer a flow when we're fat on pilots. If you see the company directory there are only 650 active pilots between captains and FO's. 179 captains and FO's on "L" status. Finally, people hired this year, or with seniority starting January 2019 including those already flying plus new hires on training are 224. We should be 325 pilots hired in 2019 by now. So if XJT wants to fly 125 ERJ's 145, and 25 175's we need solid 1500 pilots. Were are barely able to staff 70 airplanes as it is. I always thought that the flow plan, if it's true, would be to attract pilots in a cheaply manner, otherwise why would United have a flow in place?
Boy you haven't figured it out yet? You have 68 LRs and 29 XRs. They are transferring the XRs to C5 and gonna park the LRs and use those pilots to fly 175s.

XJT has the pilots for the 175s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCFDX
FedEx
94
07-27-2016 07:14 AM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
Pinchanickled
Union Talk
10
11-29-2010 04:46 PM
ATCsaidDoWhat
Union Talk
0
09-30-2010 11:49 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices