175 Bait and Switch
02-28-2020, 04:44 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 282
Originally Posted by SeeYa
we didn’t “lose” anything to Mesa
Ok, so they beat us by giving UA a better offer. What’s the difference? You can be naive and think those airplanes weren’t meant for XJT, but that was the original plan. Mesa made the deal better for UA by footing the bill for the airplanes in order to secure a long contract on the flying. If that deal hadn’t been made, those 20 airplanes would be headed to XJT.
It is plainly obvious they did not start the XJT 175 program for just 25 tails, otherwise we’d be keeping those airplanes. People who can’t see that the regionals are under the table fighting each other for scraps that the legacies drop from their table are misguided.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
02-28-2020, 04:56 AM
#42
On Reserve
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by Flydafe
we will need a good campaign to inform the rest of the pilot group because last time no one read the contract and signed a deal with a promise and a clause with Skywest in it
Accusing many of us of not reading the contract.......EHHHHH thats a little bit much dont ya think???
02-28-2020, 05:31 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by MooseAg03
Ok, so they beat us by giving UA a better offer. What’s the difference? You can be naive and think those airplanes weren’t meant for XJT, but that was the original plan. Mesa made the deal better for UA by footing the bill for the airplanes in order to secure a long contract on the flying. If that deal hadn’t been made, those 20 airplanes would be headed to XJT.
It is plainly obvious they did not start the XJT 175 program for just 25 tails, otherwise we’d be keeping those airplanes. People who can’t see that the regionals are under the table fighting each other for scraps that the legacies drop from their table are misguided.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is plainly obvious they did not start the XJT 175 program for just 25 tails, otherwise we’d be keeping those airplanes. People who can’t see that the regionals are under the table fighting each other for scraps that the legacies drop from their table are misguided.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
02-28-2020, 06:14 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by UnitedExpress
What really blows my mind is how UA ALPA actually sat back and watched a fellow United Express ALPA company in TSA go under, throw their pilots out on the street and allow
Sorry, these people don’t care about you. This is not a family.
02-28-2020, 06:23 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Originally Posted by legacysaretough
YOU obviously have not been at XJT long enough, but in Contract 2018....the potential of voting down the contract could have and would have ultimately led to our wind down (TSA claimed inability to attract pilots and now look at them)
Accusing many of us of not reading the contract.......EHHHHH thats a little bit much dont ya think???
Accusing many of us of not reading the contract.......EHHHHH thats a little bit much dont ya think???
Blah Blah Blah. Admit it. Folks fell for the scare tactics.
02-28-2020, 08:51 AM
#48
Porco Rosso
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Originally Posted by captive apple
The UA ALPA that wanted priority on your Jumpseat over YOU only to be checked by NON ALPA UAX pilots?!?
Sorry, these people don’t care about you. This is not a family.
Sorry, these people don’t care about you. This is not a family.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
