Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

CARES Act End Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2020 | 08:16 AM
  #121  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BRJPilot
Precisely! And that's why many offered COLAs, RFLs, early retirements, etc. Those actions as well as other reductions should be able to cover the difference. And is it unreasonable to expect that a company shouldn't have some of their own money available to cover unforseen circumstances? Additionally, the way I read the legislation, even though the money doled out was only a percentage of what was asked for, the ask was based on historical payroll and not the actual payroll that was adjusted/reduced after all of the voluntary cost cutting.
Prior to this, 9/11 was the measure of worse case scenario and there was money in place to ride that out. This absolutely dwarfs 9/11. Not many people are in a position to take a COLA, and voluntary reduction lines, early retirements, etc, still fall far short of providing the needed savings. This has grown into something with no easy way out. Thousands of legacy and regional pilots are going to be out of work, and there’s nothing we can do to stop it. We really can’t even slow it down. Hourly ground employees who don't have the high training expense of furlough and recall are going to be hit especially hard in October. There are going to be massive displacement bids at every company. United just put out a bid that displaces 1/3 of the list. The regionals are going to feel the pain too. I’m not trying to preach doom and gloom, but the big 3 have all said that we will emerge much smaller and that recovery will take years. United was planning for demand to be down 30% by year end, now they’re praying that it is that good. My guess is that the legal departments at the various airlines have a much better view than we do of what is allowed, and what is not. Embrace the suck, it’s going to get worse before it gets better, but it will get better.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 05:04 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Does any rational person think tax payers are going to save ALL the airlines?
I think of this as a quasi unemployment payout. This and every business out there will be lining up for their portion of treasury gifting
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 05:44 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spoiler
Does any rational person think tax payers are going to save ALL the airlines?
I think of this as a quasi unemployment payout. This and every business out there will be lining up for their portion of treasury gifting
the government will find the airlines bun any means necessary. They are essential to homeland security and the department of defense. Not the regionals I’m talking about the big three. There is some kind of civilian air service or something like that that basically says that the airlines can convert planes for military use and crew them
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 05:57 PM
  #124  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe
the government will find the airlines bun any means necessary. They are essential to homeland security and the department of defense. Not the regionals I’m talking about the big three. There is some kind of civilian air service or something like that that basically says that the airlines can convert planes for military use and crew them
The big three can slash their fleet to meet demand, survive, and then rebuild when this is over. We have most likely been given our allotment of government cheese. From here on out the industry adapts to the market. Some will survive, some won’t, but air travel, at a level that maintains essential service or homeland security, will survive without further aid. The industry will survive, it may not include the company that a person works for though.
Reply
Old 05-04-2020 | 08:26 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

We saw what happened with Amtrack - IMO it would be cheaper to do this with airlines. Mass transit in municipalities is not private to my knowledge.
Can't really argue that airlines are "free enterprise" when it's the most regulated industry in history. The "utility" argument is valid.
Nevertheless - I'm speculating that 1 trunk carrier like DAL will be funded and redundant svc be eliminated and certainly SWA. The LCC's will remain but 3 large carriers is too much to be expected.
Reply
Old 05-04-2020 | 04:06 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe
the government will find the airlines bun any means necessary. They are essential to homeland security and the department of defense. Not the regionals I’m talking about the big three. There is some kind of civilian air service or something like that that basically says that the airlines can convert planes for military use and crew them
Regionals are critical to homeland security and DOD. We fly to more airports than any of the big three.
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 09:01 AM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

At least one other airline exec sees this for what it is.
AA CEO Calling Kirby Out
Reply
Old 05-06-2020 | 09:06 AM
  #128  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Well, well, it looks like United is making the reduction in ground support staff's hours "optional" now. I wonder if they didn't like the heat from the Sentor's office or they just decided to do it out of the goodness in their hearts!

https://news.yahoo.com/united-airlin...-sh&soc_trk=ma
Reply
Old 05-07-2020 | 06:45 AM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Has there been an official statement regarding XJT getting any of the government cheese? Grant, loan, both, neither? All that I have found is old reports saying that they are having discussions with the govt.
Reply
Old 05-09-2020 | 09:11 AM
  #130  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The grant money wasn’t designed to cover all payroll expenses. The new measure in the industry is cash burn. The company burning the least amount of cash will have a better chance of survival. The flip side of this letter is that if the airlines are prevented from lowering labor cost until October, the cuts in October could be even more extreme in an attempt to recover that money. This could turn out to be a case of be careful what you wish for, especially for ground operations. They could be furloughed very deep being that it takes far less time, training, and expense to bring them back than an employee group like pilots.
^THIS^
I cannot understand why this is so hard for people to understand,
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Da Magic
Regional
33
05-18-2009 07:31 AM
naley70b
Regional
5
11-06-2008 05:22 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
53
02-12-2007 08:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices