Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

CARES Act End Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2020 | 02:19 AM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 192
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor614
To mainline pilots and us regional pilots. With whatever "colors" is on the side of the plane. WE all have to remember one thing. These are "management" toys. They allow the mainliners to fly the big toys because obviously they need a workforce to do it. You are a pawn that does a service to make profit for the company. You benefit by good pay, awesome 401k, lifestyle, gold bars or whatever you deem is a great quality by working at mainline. I want that too. Us regional pilots fly for a different company but the same product (pax) with the "same" colors and are paid a lessor wage. We fly smaller management toys at a different pay rate than is negotiated for mainliners why? Because that is the price to play with "United" toys. United allows us and mainliner to play with thier toys whether owned or lease because they get something out of it. Cheaper labor, savings in money, or whatever the reason. I'm trying to get to any mainline at any cost, I have been for 20 YEARS. Some of us has done everything to play with the big toys. College degree, no DUIs, check airmen, no failures, great personality, never late or absent for work, tithes to God, ect and just don't make it. I realized that ten years ago. Everyone wont get to play with the big toys with the awesome beenies that come with it. To the two mainliners above me I'm happy for you and all my people that got thier I really am. Maybe you checked all the boxes or maybe you didn't does not matter! You made it, you were fortunate and lucky. I said all that to say this, that aircraft you fly with that awesome logo on the side is not yours or the union's. You are negotiated to fly them at an awesome wage by your union. I want that wage to. Working hard to get it. Come October 1st if you are below a certain percentage seniority at mainline you may not have a toy to play with and not get paid, I might and probably will. These are management toys, they paint them and decides who gets to play with them and how much they will give you to do so through negotiations of course. If any mainliner get furloughed at all October 1 and I'm still flying does it matter what color scheme is on the side of the plane, proves that management gets to decides who plays with thier toys in the best interest of "thier" company. If a regional pilot somewhere is flying while a mainliner is sitting on furlough proves my point Your job flying is decided by management not you or union. Like I said earlier I'm a pawn in this game and so are you (mainline) just trying to get through it. I don't care who signs the checks (Mesa signs mine but the money comes from AA and UAL) it's negotiated that only so many small toys can be in the sandbox. You worked hard to get to play with that big toy, you got it finally just to realize it can be taken back depending on your hire date. I'm super senior at my company my toys can be taken away to. United is trying save money so I'll be around for a little while hopefully. "We" mainliners included are all pawns here. I just hope October 1, WE ALL can do one thing be able to play with a toy with a nice logo on the side.
Very good post.
That is always how it always is for just about any worker.
in spite of all “family” rhetoric (and just about all do it) when one is deemed no longer required to ”serve this ship”, they are cast overboard. The only restrictions on that are what the various country/states impose on them, and if you are lucky enough to work in a union shop, how that union uses those restrictions to enforce a legal contract.
Pawns indeed.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 06:07 AM
  #112  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by point80
According to Senator Josh Hawley’s letter to United today, any downgrades, full time moved to part, or any other maneuvers to circumvent the cares act will be grounds for removal of money.

I tried to post letterhere but APC uses such an outdated forum system it wouldnt take the photo
I'm sure many would love o see that letter. If you can't get it posted, send me a PM and I'll figure out a way to get it posted.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 06:25 AM
  #113  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by point80
According to Senator Josh Hawley’s letter to United today, any downgrades, full time moved to part, or any other maneuvers to circumvent the cares act will be grounds for removal of money.

I tried to post letterhere but APC uses such an outdated forum system it wouldnt take the photo
https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1256375034685374476
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 06:39 AM
  #114  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Crew room attendant
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1256375034685374476

Unfortunately that’s just one senators opinion. Because the cares act is law it’s up to the USTres and the federal courts to make that determination.
He’s just being a politician beating the drum so he can tell his constituents that he’s doing something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 06:48 AM
  #115  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

The grant money wasn’t designed to cover all payroll expenses. The new measure in the industry is cash burn. The company burning the least amount of cash will have a better chance of survival. The flip side of this letter is that if the airlines are prevented from lowering labor cost until October, the cuts in October could be even more extreme in an attempt to recover that money. This could turn out to be a case of be careful what you wish for, especially for ground operations. They could be furloughed very deep being that it takes far less time, training, and expense to bring them back than an employee group like pilots.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 06:53 AM
  #116  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve
Unfortunately that’s just one senators opinion. Because the cares act is law it’s up to the USTres and the federal courts to make that determination.
He’s just being a politician beating the drum so he can tell his constituents that he’s doing something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is exactly right. In politics it’s all about the appearance of doing something, not actually accomplishing anything. Pass a protective piece of legislation to protect an industry and you get to be on the news for saving those jobs, despite the fact that the same law could have cost 10 times as many jobs in related industries.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 07:09 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=ninerdriver;3047749]https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1256375034685374476[/QUOTE]

Thanks, thats thinking outside the box. I dont follow him so I didnt know he posted it.

And to everyones point. Totally agree. Politicians playing politics. And this could mean absolutely nothing. But, at the end of the day its an official letter from someone who has more authority in this situation than any of us, so thought it was news worthy.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 07:30 AM
  #118  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
The grant money wasn’t designed to cover all payroll expenses. The new measure in the industry is cash burn. The company burning the least amount of cash will have a better chance of survival. The flip side of this letter is that if the airlines are prevented from lowering labor cost until October, the cuts in October could be even more extreme in an attempt to recover that money. This could turn out to be a case of be careful what you wish for, especially for ground operations. They could be furloughed very deep being that it takes far less time, training, and expense to bring them back than an employee group like pilots.
Precisely! And that's why many offered COLAs, RFLs, early retirements, etc. Those actions as well as other reductions should be able to cover the difference. And is it unreasonable to expect that a company shouldn't have some of their own money available to cover unforseen circumstances? Additionally, the way I read the legislation, even though the money doled out was only a percentage of what was asked for, the ask was based on historical payroll and not the actual payroll that was adjusted/reduced after all of the voluntary cost cutting.
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 07:49 AM
  #119  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

All of this, especially the recent furloughs, is nothing more than ExpressJet redefining words or interpreting them in a manner that suits them best. A lot like how United is defining what a cancellation is! Another bold bet with the future of the company and its employees hanging in the balance.

​​​​​​https://www.godsavethepoints.com/biz...qKFjKsw2GsRcXc
Reply
Old 05-03-2020 | 08:06 AM
  #120  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 991
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by point80
https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1256375034685374476
Thanks, thats thinking outside the box. I dont follow him so I didnt know he posted it.

And to everyones point. Totally agree. Politicians playing politics. And this could mean absolutely nothing. But, at the end of the day its an official letter from someone who has more authority in this situation than any of us, so thought it was news worthy.[/QUOTE]

did he actually write a letter, or just tweet at them?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Da Magic
Regional
33
05-18-2009 07:31 AM
naley70b
Regional
5
11-06-2008 05:22 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
53
02-12-2007 08:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices