Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

CARES Act End Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2020 | 12:12 PM
  #151  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DBono
All this talk about whether XJT mgmt. is doing or will do the "right thing" if they get CARES money...…….. I don't really care, quite frankly. I just want XJT to survive! Please, just do whatever it takes to survive and live to fight another day.

If there's a big furlough, but XJT survives, then we (jr FO's in my case) have a decent chance of someday come back to flying jets. If XJT fails, then we are in this huge group of out of work pilots (including all the senior XJT people), the vast majority of whom have more time/experience, competing for very few openings, starting over at the bottom of some list if we are very lucky.
The problem with your position is that ExpressJet's survival is tied directly to what United's ultimate decision is regarding 50 seat flying and who it gets awarded that flying on the other end of this. It doesn't matter how healthy your company is if you're a sub-contractor and the prime contractor decides to use someone else. On the other hand, if United decides to throw you guys a bone, or throws out several bones to keep the whipsaw alive, they will do whatever they need to keep you around. In other words, you serve at the pleasure of your master (United) and have very little control over your destiny. I wouldn't be surprised if the decision hasn't already been made with regard to your fate. One thing is almost certain: you won't know it until the very last minute.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 12:42 PM
  #152  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dovic91
The problem with your position is that ExpressJet's survival is tied directly to what United's ultimate decision is regarding 50 seat flying and who it gets awarded that flying on the other end of this. It doesn't matter how healthy your company is if you're a sub-contractor and the prime contractor decides to use someone else. On the other hand, if United decides to throw you guys a bone, or throws out several bones to keep the whipsaw alive, they will do whatever they need to keep you around. In other words, you serve at the pleasure of your master (United) and have very little control over your destiny. I wouldn't be surprised if the decision hasn't already been made with regard to your fate. One thing is almost certain: you won't know it until the very last minute.
That could be true. It could also be true that mgmt is leveling with us, and UA is watching our response (and the responses of other UAX carriers) closely to determine who continues being a partner. One thing is sure, if we cannot even survive until that decision point, then for sure there is no future for us. So given all that, I think the company's short-term performance is very much relevant.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 03:51 PM
  #153  
DBono's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Whole lotta sitting
Default

Originally Posted by dovic91
The problem with your position is that ExpressJet's survival is tied directly to what United's ultimate decision is regarding 50 seat flying and who it gets awarded that flying on the other end of this. It doesn't matter how healthy your company is if you're a sub-contractor and the prime contractor decides to use someone else. On the other hand, if United decides to throw you guys a bone, or throws out several bones to keep the whipsaw alive, they will do whatever they need to keep you around. In other words, you serve at the pleasure of your master (United) and have very little control over your destiny. I wouldn't be surprised if the decision hasn't already been made with regard to your fate. One thing is almost certain: you won't know it until the very last minute.
I don't disagree - you described the 1st level problem well. Nothing would be surprising, including the decision being already made. We'd be the last to find out. I was addressing the people who seem upset that XJT mgmt. is not being transparent about money that they don't even have yet. The difference between furlough in May or furlough in Oct is relatively trivial. It's much more important that there is an entity surviving to keep the furlough list relevant.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 06:02 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNietzsche
That could be true. It could also be true that mgmt is leveling with us, and UA is watching our response (and the responses of other UAX carriers) closely to determine who continues being a partner. One thing is sure, if we cannot even survive until that decision point, then for sure there is no future for us. So given all that, I think the company's short-term performance is very much relevant.
"UA is watching our response (and the responses of other UAX carriers) closely to determine who continues being a partner."
What are they watching for? To see who jumps 1st or who jumps higher?

Gauging short term performance? What's the metric for that? It should be pretty easy to operate at 10% capacity, right?

Regarding the decision point, I think it's likely that we've already reached that point. While they'd like to keep it a secret, it will eventually slip out unintentionally. Just like it slipped out when Delta decided to cancel the CPA with XJT. Or when big Ed slipped up and told an audience at an investor meeting that they would be going down to 3 regional partners. Who knows, the slip up could have been the Skywest call last week.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 06:07 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DBono
It's much more important that there is an entity surviving to keep the furlough list relevant.
Assuming for a minute that the decision is already made, do you think United will let whoever they choose just go down the tubes? I don't think they care about anything other than who provides the cheapest product at the lowest acceptable performance level.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 07:36 PM
  #156  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
"UA is watching our response (and the responses of other UAX carriers) closely to determine who continues being a partner."
What are they watching for? To see who jumps 1st or who jumps higher?
To see who can survive and be the most responsive to whatever their needs happen to be at any given moment. That's how this works.

Originally Posted by piloto2
Gauging short term performance? What's the metric for that? It should be pretty easy to operate at 10% capacity, right?
In the short run, performance will be primarily gauged by cutting costs to match revenue.

Originally Posted by piloto2
Regarding the decision point, I think it's likely that we've already reached that point. While they'd like to keep it a secret, it will eventually slip out unintentionally. Just like it slipped out when Delta decided to cancel the CPA with XJT. Or when big Ed slipped up and told an audience at an investor meeting that they would be going down to 3 regional partners. Who knows, the slip up could have been the Skywest call last week.
You might be exactly correct, but then again, I don't think we should give up just yet and act like our performance is irrelevant. We don't know that yet. All I'm saying is none of us really knows if we even have a shot in the long run, but we might, so we ought to try to survive the short run.
Reply
Old 05-11-2020 | 10:21 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
Default

If demand stays where it's at, down 90%, there will be bankruptcies and all bets are off. The next few years could be like something we've never seen before. Time to sharpen those second set of skills. People are petrified to get locked in an aluminum germ tube for hours on end.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 06:17 AM
  #158  
StartUp161WanaB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat 98Toyota
Default

People are eager to fly
my deadhead on the Airbus 320 was packed
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 06:30 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
If demand stays where it's at, down 90%, there will be bankruptcies and all bets are off. The next few years could be like something we've never seen before. Time to sharpen those second set of skills. People are petrified to get locked in an aluminum germ tube for hours on end.
I agree with all except the last sentence. Pax are coming back slowly. Demand is down due to many factors, including lack of discretionary funds and lack of a reason to travel. I believe most people will travel when they have a reason and the funds to do it. I am not a believer in mass hysteria at this point. The disease and mitigating procedures have been defined. Education of the public has been on-going since March. If pax demand is still down after the economy recovers in a couple of years then I will assume aluminum tube petrification. Until then I will assume that demand is more a matter of no reason to travel (vacations and business travel cancelled) and folks are delaying airline travel until future income is more solid than it is now. IMO (we all have them ).
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 07:10 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
Default

The funds are there, with this additional unemployment stimulus from federal of $600/week on top of state funds, some people are actually making more than they did at their normal job. In one of my businesses which is mandated closed, my employees don’t want to come back to work because they are making more money sitting at home. It’s bonkers. The illegals and people who worked off the books or for cash tips and didn’t claim tips as income are being hit the hardest for sure.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Da Magic
Regional
33
05-18-2009 07:31 AM
naley70b
Regional
5
11-06-2008 05:22 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
53
02-12-2007 08:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices