Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

CARES Act End Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:11 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BRJPilot
I haven't seen anything official either, but they are operating under the assumption that they will receive the money.
How is this operating under the assumption? To me this looks like the preparation of a bunch of FOs on the street.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:16 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
Seriously.....you guys have to understand that the goal is to save the jobs in the long run....not save take home pay in the short run. But whatever....go ahead and burn through all that cash and shut the whole thing down even sooner 🤷🏻‍♂️ Uncle Sugar’s bailout isn’t gonna be able to sustain the status quo through all this. Adjustments have to be made.
Do you really think that saving cash now is going to protect anyone's job after September if the schedules going forward require reduced staffing?
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:16 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
Where exactly in the act does it state "published hourly rates". It just says "pay rate" in everything I've read. Getting your pay cut in half is certainly a change in one's pay rate. If the Act wasn't meant to protect people's historic take home pay, why did the application for the government money require applicants to document historic salaries?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pay%20rate

The purpose of requiring companies to give the government historic payroll expense was to determine the level of funding that was distributed. Going from a captain who maxed out their hours out last year to a first officer making reserve guarantee is a substantial reduction in take home pay, but the company didn’t reduce any rates. It’s not always about the spirit of the law, but the actual wording. When the 14th Amendment was passed, the spirit and intent of the law was to give the recently freed slaves the rights of citizenship as a free people born into this country, not as property, as was the case before. Granting anchor babies citizenship never was their intent or within the spirit of the law, but it is within the actual text. I don’t want to start some big political debate on immigration, this is just an example of the spirit vs what the law actually says.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:19 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by point80
How is this operating under the assumption? To me this looks like the preparation of a bunch of FOs on the street.

A bunch of pilots from every airline in the country are going to be on the street unless demand miraculously returns in the next 6 months.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:22 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pay%20rate

The purpose of requiring companies to give the government historic payroll expense was to determine the level of funding that was distributed. Going from a captain who maxed out their hours out last year to a first officer making reserve guarantee is a substantial reduction in take home pay, but the company didn’t reduce any rates. It’s not always about the spirit of the law, but the actual wording. When the 14th Amendment was passed, the spirit and intent of the law was to give the recently freed slaves the rights of citizenship as a free people born into this country, not as property, as was the case before. Granting anchor babies citizenship never was their intent or within the spirit of the law, but it is within the actual text. I don’t want to start some big political debate on immigration, this is just an example of the spirit vs what the law actually says.
​​​​​​

Definition of pay rate: the amount of money workers are paid per hour, week, etc.

When you change someones pay from $75/hr to $42 per hour, you changed their pay rate. No, it wasn't across the board for everyone, but it was a pay rate change for those impacted. Again, please show me where exactly in the act it states "published hourly rates".
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:24 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by point80
How is this operating under the assumption? To me this looks like the preparation of a bunch of FOs on the street.
Yes, and that will likely happen in October. But the truth is that they are cutting pay rates for some right now, ahead of the date in the CARES act.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:29 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
A bunch of pilots from every airline in the country are going to be on the street unless demand miraculously returns in the next 6 months.
Except without the CARES ACT it will be a lot sooner. Again their has yet to be news that XJT is getting anything. He said they were operating under the assumption that they were. My question is how is moving people from the left seat to the right operating under that assumption?
Might want to read the entire discussion before chiming in with a pointless comment. But thanks for the input.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:31 AM
  #18  
CaseTractor's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 426
Likes: 2
From: Pipers!
Default

Whoever has the dumpster fire gif animation handy would do well to post it again to keep up the tradition
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:35 AM
  #19  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BRJPilot
Do you really think that saving cash now is going to protect anyone's job after September if the schedules going forward require reduced staffing?
Not a chance in h3ll.

Regarding downgrades, many airlines will be doing that this summer to set the table for easy furloughs.

If it is determined that it's in violation of the CARES act, they'll simply pay protect the downgrades until 01 Oct. But I bet they try to make it a paycut and see what they can get away with.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 08:45 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by point80
My question is how is moving people from the left seat to the right operating under that assumption?
Two separate things. The company believes that downgrading someone isn't a pay rate change. They can't do that across the board and they can't furlough at this point, but they are trying to save some money short term by effectively reducing the rate for some employees.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Da Magic
Regional
33
05-18-2009 07:31 AM
naley70b
Regional
5
11-06-2008 05:22 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
53
02-12-2007 08:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices