Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups? >

ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups?

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2011, 10:49 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 139
Default

Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.
How do you figure?

total pilots * credit hours per year * hourly pay rate = rough estimate of pilot labor cost

If you take hourly pay rate * 2, you don't get anywhere near the same total as hourly pay rate * 1.

I get the point that pilot labor costs are a smaller part of the budget pie than some of the other slices (fuel, facilities, maintenance, aircraft leases)...but to say it's an inconsequential slice is in denial of reality.

At ASA, we just got this giant pay cut from DAL. The way they *were* running an airline and making money doesn't work after that. So, they're trying to figure out how to run an airline and make money in an age of lower total compensation from the primary mainline partner. Keeping crew/labor costs lower is one of the ways they can try to achieve that.

I'm not endorsing it or saying it's right or the best way, but it's one facet in a multi-faceted approach.
johnpeace is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 11:24 AM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 36
Default

Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.

Crew salaries and benefits are still only part of the crew costs. Training, tsa requirements, parking, jepp updates, overhead, and hotel costs are all part of your cost not just your pay rate. I'm sure someone already said this but there are quality of life increases that I want that do have a cost, that our competition does not have.
Dexter is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 12:20 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilverandSore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by antbar01 View Post
To those who are under the spell of management, I suggest that the next time you're at cruise... do a little calculating as to what the entire crew is making on the given leg you are flying, versus the amount of money that is being combusted in the rear of the aircraft. It's high school math, and at XJT we have the fuel price paid by the company right on our paperwork (ask the fueler if you need to).

If you do this, you will see that if you are an FO like myself that your entire salary for the flight is comparable to the cost to the company incurred when ATC let one extra dude take off before you when you already had them both turning. Note too that NOBODY from ASA or XJT has asked for fuel conservation measures in the last few years.

Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.

Pilots suffer from (appropriately) enormous egos, but don't allow your judgement to be clouded as to how much your big fat check is hurting the company's shareholders.
You are factually incorrect. Crew costs are the largest component of total operating expenses per the the agreements we have with our mainline partners. I'm too lazy to look at the 2010 data but the 2009 numbers showed crew costs at 29% of total operating expenses. Yeah, double that and there will be no affect to the stockholder.
SilverandSore is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 05:56 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by antbar01 View Post
Note too that NOBODY from ASA or XJT has asked for fuel conservation measures in the last few years.
Project APU? Performance Cost Index? Attilla (sp?)? Those are three major efforts to save fuel at ASA over the last several years to cut fuel costs.

Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.

Pilots suffer from (appropriately) enormous egos, but don't allow your judgement to be clouded as to how much your big fat check is hurting the company's shareholders.
Airlines historically operate on very low profit margins - when you're only set to make 1-4%, doubling our salary would quickly eat into that profit!

Don't misunderstand, I think there should be a uniform, mainline level salary for all part 121 operations. But realistically, let's shoot for what we can actually get.
gtechpilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:17 PM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
IfitsTuesday's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Q FO
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by [B
But realistically, let's shoot for what we can actually get.[/B]
Just like the CEO's do!
IfitsTuesday is offline  
Old 05-04-2011, 03:50 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by IfitsTuesday View Post
Just like the CEO's do!
True - JO at Mesa seems a prime example in this case!!
gtechpilot is offline  
Old 05-04-2011, 04:27 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hendefea's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by gtechpilot View Post
Project APU? Performance Cost Index? Attilla (sp?)? Those are three major efforts to save fuel at ASA over the last several years to cut fuel costs.



Airlines historically operate on very low profit margins - when you're only set to make 1-4%, doubling our salary would quickly eat into that profit!

Don't misunderstand, I think there should be a uniform, mainline level salary for all part 121 operations. But realistically, let's shoot for what we can actually get.
Agreed.....

Earnings (or lack there of) call is today at 11am i believe.....lets see what they have to say.
hendefea is offline  
Old 05-05-2011, 08:11 AM
  #98  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
Default

Originally Posted by antbar01 View Post
To those who are under the spell of management, I suggest that the next time you're at cruise... do a little calculating as to what the entire crew is making on the given leg you are flying, versus the amount of money that is being combusted in the rear of the aircraft. It's high school math, and at XJT we have the fuel price paid by the company right on our paperwork (ask the fueler if you need to).

If you do this, you will see that if you are an FO like myself that your entire salary for the flight is comparable to the cost to the company incurred when ATC let one extra dude take off before you when you already had them both turning. Note too that NOBODY from ASA or XJT has asked for fuel conservation measures in the last few years.

Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.

Pilots suffer from (appropriately) enormous egos, but don't allow your judgement to be clouded as to how much your big fat check is hurting the company's shareholders.
You have to remember that under capacity purchase agreements, the regional carrier does not pay for the fuel, so your calculations mean nothing because fuel does not impact the bottom line except in special cases such as ferry and test flights. Delta and Conited pick up the tab at the pump, then pay a contractually predetermined fee to the operator for the departure of that flight. This predetermined fee in ASA's case is less than what it costs the company to operate the flight, so it becomes management's duty to bring the company's cost structure below the point that the fee for departure is more than the cost of operating the flight, thus bringing the company back to profit. Doubling the crew cost would indeed hurt the bottom line.
RamenNoodles is offline  
Old 05-05-2011, 10:47 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Truman_Sparks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by Dexter View Post
Crew salaries and benefits are a minute fraction of the equation. They could double our pay and have nearly the same bottom line.

Crew salaries and benefits are still only part of the crew costs. Training, tsa requirements, parking, jepp updates, overhead, and hotel costs are all part of your cost not just your pay rate. I'm sure someone already said this but there are quality of life increases that I want that do have a cost, that our competition does not have.
Where do you geniuses come up with garbage? Do you make it up and then spout it out like facts? Crew costs are a HUGE portion of bottom line costs. Any increase to them, even 1-2% are going to further dent the bottom line. ASA/XJT is in a hurting way right now. I can't think of a worse time to be negotiating. There is no money in the pot anymore.
Truman_Sparks is offline  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:08 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 139
Default

I can't think of a worse time to be negotiating.
At least we get to do it with 2 angry pilot groups instead of just 1...that'll surely make it easier. HAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!
johnpeace is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
FLW2003
Cargo
44
02-24-2011 10:08 PM
HSLD
Military
0
04-30-2009 05:27 PM
SWAjet
Corporate
40
05-02-2007 05:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices