Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups? >

ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups?

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ASA / Expressjet merge pilot groups?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 09:08 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by johnpeace View Post
- Most of the XJet pilots I have talked to have exactly the opposite attitude and think that they're working under a 'concessionary' contract and that they can't possibly gain enough of a pay increase to make their job worth it.
What do you mean "think they are working under a concessionary contract?"

We ARE working under a concessionary contract, there is NO thinking we are what so ever.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 09:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by johnpeace View Post
- Most of the XJet pilots I have talked to have exactly the opposite attitude and think that they're working under a 'concessionary' contract
Maybe you missed the part where XJT Pilots voted for the current concessionary pay scale to keep the company afloat 2 years ago? The current pay rates are not from Contract 2004...XJT and ASA pilots will be of like mind eventually, we just wonder how many times ASA guys need to get burned drinking the Kool-Aid before they clue-in.

Maybe you also missed basic business classes, because this merger wouldn't be happening (After being proposed TWICE) if SKW Inc didn't expect to make a killing on the deal by outsizing the competition, with Economies of Scale more than offsetting any increase in Pilot compensation.
blastoff is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 09:37 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 569
Default

I don't think 3 years is accurate. Last I heard, directly from the committee, late fall, like someone else mentioned (October) was given as a completion time for the JCBA.
dba74 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 10:13 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by dba74 View Post
I don't think 3 years is accurate. Last I heard, directly from the committee, late fall, like someone else mentioned (October) was given as a completion time for the JCBA.
Remember, it's voted on. If they present us with a turd, vote appropriately.

I'm not gonna speak for a whole group, but anything less than what we have now is a turd. If they wanna give us that, whatever. But I think it's safe to say that the XJT group (largest) isn't in the mood to take ANOTHER concession in any way shape or form.

Of course, management, as well as the MECs will use the standard scare tactics to try and get it through on the first go. Some of them have already started.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 11:09 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
somertime32's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I can fly.....I'm a pilot
Posts: 442
Default

How do you guys think a vote would work? With express jet having a larger group I would think that each pilot group would vote on it and if it passed both groups then it would be approved.
somertime32 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 11:18 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by somertime32 View Post
How do you guys think a vote would work? With express jet having a larger group I would think that each pilot group would vote on it and if it passed both groups then it would be approved.
Could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the vote goes out to ALL pilots, not two separate groups of pilots.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 11:25 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,016
Default

Just looked through the TPA, and the way I read it, both MECs have to approve the JCBA individually, then a simple majority of the combined pilot group.

Last edited by todd1200; 04-27-2011 at 11:36 AM. Reason: Looked it up
todd1200 is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 12:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Remember, it's voted on. If they present us with a turd, vote appropriately.

I'm not gonna speak for a whole group, but anything less than what we have now is a turd. If they wanna give us that, whatever. But I think it's safe to say that the XJT group (largest) isn't in the mood to take ANOTHER concession in any way shape or form.

Of course, management, as well as the MECs will use the standard scare tactics to try and get it through on the first go. Some of them have already started.
I keep hearing that tossed around, how XJT outnumbers ASA. And they do. But do numbers matter when something goes to mediation?
captain beefy is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 01:47 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by captain beefy View Post
I keep hearing that tossed around, how XJT outnumbers ASA. And they do. But do numbers matter when something goes to mediation?
Read the post above yours. I just talked to my rep, maybe yours will tell you something different. There is NO pilot group A vote vs. pilot group B vote, hence NO mediation. At least for JCBA purposes.

Maybe SOC will be complete by the fall, like that stupid colorful brochure I got in the mail says it will. But I think that a JCBA, SLI, and a MOAB in the fall is a tad optimistic.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 04:16 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 139
Default

What do you mean "think they are working under a concessionary contract?"
Sorry, I got in a hurry and oversimplified and used too few words. Yes, it's a concessionary contract.

The pre-concessionary ideal, however, simply isn't sustainable under ASA's business model. Apparently, it wasn't sustainable under XJet's business model either, which is why there had to be concessions in the first place.

My point is that since 66% of the labor group is stubbornly seems determined to hold out for an unrealistic, unsustainable ideal from '04, this isn't going anywhere fast and will likely wind up in mediation. In mediation, none of us will get as good a deal as we could negotiate for ourselves.
johnpeace is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
FLW2003
Cargo
44
02-24-2011 10:08 PM
HSLD
Military
0
04-30-2009 05:27 PM
SWAjet
Corporate
40
05-02-2007 05:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices