Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

L-ASA (ExpressJet CRJ side)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2017, 07:18 PM
  #1011  
Line Holder
 
HuntinFishin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: In reverse
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomHawk View Post
For those of us who are financially challenged......is that a good thing or a bad thing?
I'm curious too? OO stock has risen since nov so maybe just buying one of the mrs. a new condo.
HuntinFishin is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 03:29 AM
  #1012  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Insiders buy when it is a good deal. There’s no telling why they sell, could be that condo, better opportunity,or looming disaster. Unless a bunch dump the stock at the same time you just don’t know until.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 04:01 AM
  #1013  
Line Holder
 
HuntinFishin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: In reverse
Posts: 39
Default

Another option is the intent to "short it" they know when the buy rumor falls flat it's going to lose a more than a few points. This would need to be done far enough in advance to avoid investigation by SEC like well before first rumor of the UAL purchase that recently pushed stock price up broke. So that when it falls they can point back to the SELL timming that it was in fact well before first word hit official papers. Strategicaly brilliant kill 2 birds one stone. Hold the pilot group on hope of a rumor of a buy and cash in too.. ruthless CHESS not checkers.

Last edited by HuntinFishin; 12-13-2017 at 04:14 AM.
HuntinFishin is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 04:19 AM
  #1014  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by HuntinFishin View Post
Another option is the intent to "short it" they know when the buy rumor falls flat it's going to lose a more than a few points. This would need to be done far enough in advance to avoid investigation by SEC like well before first rumor of the UAL purchase that recently pushed stock price up broke. So that when it falls they can point back to the SELL timming that it was in fact well before first word hit official papers. Strategicaly brilliant kill 2 birds one stone. Hold the pilot group on hope of a rumor of a buy and cash in too.. ruthless CHESS not checkers.
I would think if they were that smart they would be running a profitable company.
simscott is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 04:32 AM
  #1015  
Part of the problem
 
Flogger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: CRJ200 CA
Posts: 577
Default

Originally Posted by simscott View Post
I would think if they were that smart they would be running a profitable company.
XJT is a profitable company. The profits are not being shown on the xjt side on purpose.
Flogger is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 04:46 AM
  #1016  
Line Holder
 
HuntinFishin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: In reverse
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by simscott View Post
I would think if they were that smart they would be running a profitable company.
Are you referring to OO right to be clear XJT management runs nothing, knows nothing. Every decision they make is phoned in from SGU. Anyone who hasent figured this out yet must be brand spanking new.
HuntinFishin is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 06:21 AM
  #1017  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

I’m not sure, as a designated insider, you’re allowed to short that particular stock. I could be wrong, but I think that is the rule.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 06:27 AM
  #1018  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Just looked it up...not illegal per se, but you’re opening yourself up to an SEC mine field and probably not worth the risk. The rationale being if you’re doing what’s best for employees and other shareholders there is no need to short.

Probably really bad idea for Joe Employee and a worse than terrible idea for the type who has to report their trades to the SEC.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 06:46 AM
  #1019  
Line Holder
 
HuntinFishin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: In reverse
Posts: 39
Default

Right, and it's just an opinion on my part. But stINC management has no reason to do anything right for XJT employees (and haven't) share holders sure. I'd love to see see one of these folks get caught with their hand in the perverbial cookie jar. And I may be incorrect this was the XJT COO right? If so maybe feels far enough removed..maybe

Last edited by HuntinFishin; 12-13-2017 at 07:00 AM.
HuntinFishin is offline  
Old 12-13-2017, 07:46 AM
  #1020  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Opinion or wishful thinking?😉

Can’t say I don’t sympathize.
gatorhater is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
lovellrt
SkyWest
15181
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
OscarOscar
ExpressJet
2
10-01-2008 10:57 AM
Ellen
Regional
11
03-06-2007 05:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices