Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Lessons Learned at United >

Lessons Learned at United

Search

Notices

Lessons Learned at United

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2022 | 11:58 AM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 477
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
If Todd Insler (the UA MEC chair who unilaterally rammed himself into three consecutive terms in violation of their bylaws) is elected to be the ALPA national president, then we SHOULD NOT remain an ALPA member.

Folks, now is the time to let your LEC reps know that they need to actively oppose Todd Insler at the national level. It is going to take every ALPA airline actively opposing him or we are all going to get the impotent, self-serving representation that UA pilots have had.
I agree and have already let them know.
Reply
Old 07-30-2022 | 03:32 PM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kwri10s
Just fly your line. Not the same footprint of your line, not the same number of days as your line, just your line. If you have CIC conflict then you can pick up your makeup, but that's it. You do not have to take a hit on your pay unless you want to not pick up bidding conflict MU. Many don't. No AVA, no draft, no extensions. There is not pressure on the system every hour of every day. There is pressure here and there. We do not know where that is. It might be MEM departures on one day and total pilots in CDG another. It could be number of pilots turning IND or OAK, it could be 777 CLOE instructors or 767 training instructors, we don't know what the issues are day to day. IF you fly your line then the pressure will show up where it needs to show up, when it needs to show up and we all know the system cannot be flown without a significant portion of the pilots doing extra. All we are asking is to be compensated for our sacrifice and efforts. Just do your job. If you are rationalizing what you are doing then you already know your buddies would say you are wrong. Wear your negotiation lanyard and stop talking to those that cannot be bothered to show they support the other pilots by wearing theirs. Feel free to fight amongst ourselves on whether or not the negotiating team will get us what we want, but your public face and flying schedule needs to be full support.
sorry. If I’m gonna pick up 30 hour trip to complete my line due to conflict. I’m doing it at 150. Preferably 20 hours at 150. Every single trip in opentime, can go at 150. No need to be a sucker and fly it at straight time.
Reply
Old 07-30-2022 | 06:32 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Default Lessons Learned at United

Originally Posted by BertMacklinFBI
sorry. If I’m gonna pick up 30 hour trip to complete my line due to conflict. I’m doing it at 150. Preferably 20 hours at 150. Every single trip in opentime, can go at 150. No need to be a sucker and fly it at straight time.

So anyone who doesn’t fly any trips at 150 is a sucker? Should every single pilot only fly at 150 to not be a sucker?
Reply
Old 07-30-2022 | 06:46 PM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 832
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by BertMacklinFBI
sorry. If I’m gonna pick up 30 hour trip to complete my line due to conflict. I’m doing it at 150. Preferably 20 hours at 150. Every single trip in opentime, can go at 150. No need to be a sucker and fly it at straight time.
Sorry? At least be honest. You’re not sorry. Self-serving? Yeah. You’ve got that in spades.

While you’re out getting yours, there’s a huge percentage of us that won’t be doing extra and haven’t since May of ‘21. We’d love for you to join us. But you’ve gotta reach that conclusion on your own.
Reply
Old 07-30-2022 | 10:51 PM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

If I need to pick up 30 hours of flying to cover a conflict drop, convince me why I should do it at straight time. You could really twist the screws to em and just conflict and get no pay! That’ll teach em!

For example, I can pick the trip up 8 days in advance. Or I can wait one day and get 150% and fly less days. No. I don’t think you’re a sucker. I was being jovial.

The problem, in my opinion, lies with people flying past min days off or calling/willing to extend forever. I think working less at premium is more trouble for the company as you are giving them less of your time. Yes. You help them in the short term. But it’s just kicking the can down the road. Draft/VLT is available nearly all the time (on some fleets).
Reply
Old 07-31-2022 | 02:00 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by BertMacklinFBI
If I need to pick up 30 hours of flying to cover a conflict drop, convince me why I should do it at straight time. You could really twist the screws to em and just conflict and get no pay! That’ll teach em!

For example, I can pick the trip up 8 days in advance. Or I can wait one day and get 150% and fly less days. No. I don’t think you’re a sucker. I was being jovial.

The problem, in my opinion, lies with people flying past min days off or calling/willing to extend forever. I think working less at premium is more trouble for the company as you are giving them less of your time. Yes. You help them in the short term. But it’s just kicking the can down the road. Draft/VLT is available nearly all the time (on some fleets).
This is nonsense. These guys are arguing making more money for the same hours is helping the company. Its a stupid argument. The fact is that the Company is understaffed that's the problem and that is a MANHOURS problem. It is only resolved by someone flying EXTRA DAYS. What you get paid for BLG hours is not relevant and I'm still waiting for someone to adequately explain how it is.

Please ignore those selling the "fly your schedule" mantra. You can make your schedule whatever you need it to be as long as you're flying the same number of days. Maybe these guys just need it to be a one size fits all policy because anything more complicated than that is just too hard for their comprehension.
Reply
Old 07-31-2022 | 03:57 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BertMacklinFBI
No soup for you. I agree. Ridiculous that they can all of a sudden impose this. The union is doing nothing about it. Submitted a dart, no actionable response. Just another roll over.
Originally Posted by BertMacklinFBI
If I need to pick up 30 hours of flying to cover a conflict drop, convince me why I should do it at straight time. You could really twist the screws to em and just conflict and get no pay! That’ll teach em!

For example, I can pick the trip up 8 days in advance. Or I can wait one day and get 150% and fly less days. No. I don’t think you’re a sucker. I was being jovial.

The problem, in my opinion, lies with people flying past min days off or calling/willing to extend forever. I think working less at premium is more trouble for the company as you are giving them less of your time. Yes. You help them in the short term. But it’s just kicking the can down the road. Draft/VLT is available nearly all the time (on some fleets).
Complain on one end and justify on another.

Using your logic, it is fine to extend a 5 day trip into 13 days and get paid 200% for most of the trip. You could be working less days and getting paid more. It only is helping the company in the short term. Any other rules of what is ok and not?

Bottom line is the contract allows pilots to fly draft. It is an individual decision until we are released to self help. If you feel the need to justify your actions, maybe you should rethink those actions.
Reply
Old 07-31-2022 | 04:08 AM
  #98  
DirtyPurple's Avatar
Generationally Damaged
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Dynamically Leveled
Default

This comes down to tribal politics from my perspective. Everyone agrees to just fly basic days (15 days/19 days) during the bid month. Then it splits into the "math/logic" tribe vs the "this is what I've always done" tribe. Never shall the two find common ground, although they both agree on the basic premise of flying only the basic days per month. No amount of autistic internet screeching will convince the other tribe to change positions. Funny part is, both tribes are performing nearly the same maneuver, while only emphasizing the difference in technique.

Just show me a TA; I'll evaluate its merits. Until then, my coworkers do not get a vote in how I orchestrate my family balance for the month. Nor do I hunt down other pilot's calendars to see what they're doing. Call me a heretic; I just go to work and try to keep the political ranting at bay.
Reply
Old 07-31-2022 | 05:30 AM
  #99  
kronan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Just me, but when I'm conflicting a trip (or get Bumped for Training), I'm enjoying my time off.

Shoot, past 2 months I've dropped\given away about 40CHs.
Barring a year 1 or 2 employment longevity, if you can't live on 50% of your BLG....you've got a spending problem and you're truly not ready for Contract Negotiations.
If you're going insane over the recent inflation levels and the fact that we're not perusing a TA yet (May was the goal, which is what, 6 months past our amendable date?)
Then you're truly not ready for Contract Negotiations.

Is your personal goal a Fast TA or the Right TA?

A TA will eventually happen. And when it does, please, please....read it, think about it. Take the time to search out the Pros and Cons. Consider the things that will have improved as well as the things that didn't change (or perhaps even declined, International Hotel $$ worsened in TA2015. Some of the old Subic guys were frequent visitors of Vacation Destinations on Company $$. Something that only increased in frequency when HKG opened up. And that was something the Company went after. It's one thing to pay for a few people to hit a 5 star resort, another when lot's of people do so)
Reply
Old 07-31-2022 | 06:30 AM
  #100  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 157
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
If Todd Insler (the UA MEC chair who unilaterally rammed himself into three consecutive terms in violation of their bylaws) is elected to be the ALPA national president, then we SHOULD NOT remain an ALPA member.

Folks, now is the time to let your LEC reps know that they need to actively oppose Todd Insler at the national level. It is going to take every ALPA airline actively opposing him or we are all going to get the impotent, self-serving representation that UA pilots have had.
Originally Posted by HvypurplePylot
I agree and have already let them know.

I wrote my LEC reps last night.

Seriously folks, if you want a lesson learned from United it's this: DO NOT allow Todd Insler to become ALPA president (unless you want the United $H!tshow to become our $H!tshow). Their The UA MEC chairman was as cozy with management as anyone I've seen in 25yrs as an airline pilot. Gave away tons of scope, quality of life, and money -- all outside of bankruptcy.

Write your reps or we may have an airline CEO wannabe as our national representative.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
9
05-15-2008 05:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices