![]() |
The system bid isn’t even my concern. A couple years of heartburn is something I could deal with. ASL getting 767 for their Australian ops? Can you say Qantas DH to CAN? Richard Smith quoted tonight saying the EUR 757’s are coming back stateside after the email specifically said we’d be covering the EUR flying from MEM? Who are you gonna believe? SCOPE!!!! None of this **** is going to matter if we let them outsource our international flying. And our domestic? If don’t get the postal contract renewed this place is going to look a whole lot different as well. Day flying? What’s that?
It’s looking like it’s too late for scope. I’d be less concerned if we all understood how dire of a situation our lack of scope has put us in. Would be one thing if our union leadership had something else to say other than “our survey data doesn’t state that.” Time to get my apps back out. Never thought the second year pay I was counting the days for would be going into interview prep, again. Hopefully I haven’t shot myself in the foot after leaving a legacy and turning down others. |
Originally Posted by Rum Runner
(Post 3623797)
Damn, this is worse than I thought. I'm too old and been here too long now, but if you are in the bottom 1000-1500 or under the age of 40, maybe even 45, you seriously need to look at other options. Only caveat is this being the biggest grenade of a distraction in negotiations that I remember here. Keep the eyes on the prize. Tough.
How times have changed. |
Originally Posted by oncewasgood
(Post 3623905)
A 30% reduction from Covid highs. 30% less than 130% is 100% correct?
- You have $100 to start with. You decide to play roulette at the casino this weekend. - You earn a 30% return, so now you have $130. You take this and put it in your piggy bank. - Next weekend you go back to the casino to play roulette again. - This time you have a 30% loss. 30% of $130 = 0.3*$130 = $39....so you lose $39. - This means you take the $130 from your piggy bank, and subtract $39 = $91 (so the dollar amounts are additive: $100+$30-$39) - However, if you wanted to get the final amount in one step using percentages you would need to multiply, so: 100% * 130% *70% = 100/100 * 130/100 * 70/100 = 100*130*70 / 1,000,000 = 91/100 = 91% (or...1.0*1.3*.7 = .91). - The word "percent" is derived from Latin "per centum" which means "by one hundred" Now back to the bid....where everyone is going to be a 75FO. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3623918)
Helped get a friend hired from the military into United 2 years ago. He left United about 4 months later for FedEX because he felt cargo was “more stable”. He’d have 4,500 pilots junior to him now at United and be able to hold 737 Captain in almost every base and 756 Captain on the West coast. He just texted me asking if I thought United would let him come back.
How times have changed. If I were still there I’d be ~20% NB ORD FO, or ~85% ORD WB FO. Both things I never thought would happen in ORD in the year 2023, but now I just get to have nightmares about it, during the day, because I’m hub turning at night. |
Originally Posted by Shaman
(Post 3623733)
Fedex management once again making big plans that will in retrospect only further show their incompetence. They are over playing this by a mile and will be substantially behind the power curve when this turns around. They will be unable to meet the demand and will continue to cede customers to the carriers they're trying to emulate in unceasing attempts to pump up a metric that presents no value to the company's bottom line.
Hold fast gents its all gonna be ok and this summer is gonna crush some doomsday economists egos. |
Originally Posted by Linepilot63
(Post 3623922)
I’d have about 4000 below me at United if I had stayed. I tried to go back and the answer was no. I tried before I was even finished with ITU here. I was told to reapply, but at that time I didn’t feel it was worth starting over again. Needless to say I never thought I’d actually consider going back and being 4000 junior to my class mates I was hired with, but here we are. This is my worst nightmare and more. And once again, SCOPE. This isn’t about an inevitable system bid we all saw coming.
If I were still there I’d be ~20% NB ORD FO, or ~85% ORD WB FO. Both things I never thought would happen in ORD in the year 2023, but now I just get to have nightmares about it, during the day, because I’m hub turning at night. |
Originally Posted by oncewasgood
(Post 3623905)
A 30% reduction from Covid highs. 30% less than 130% is 100% correct?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quick spreadsheet with the numbers. Someone posted that using the max numbers that we would be overstaffed, we wouldn't. Negative numbers mean a gain in that seat. At the end of it all we are between 192 overstaffed and 134 understaffed. With planned retirements, pretty sure everyone's jobs are safe, just not their current seat.
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3623763)
480? how did you get that math
They overhired. According to the bid they have 200 too many and they're going to push that excess from the most expensive to the least expensive seat. We'll see how far they get into it before the tide turns (it always does eventually) |
Originally Posted by Linepilot63
(Post 3623922)
I’d have about 4000 below me at United if I had stayed. I tried to go back and the answer was no. I tried before I was even finished with ITU here. I was told to reapply, but at that time I didn’t feel it was worth starting over again. Needless to say I never thought I’d actually consider going back and being 4000 junior to my class mates I was hired with, but here we are. This is my worst nightmare and more. And once again, SCOPE. This isn’t about an inevitable system bid we all saw coming.
If I were still there I’d be ~20% NB ORD FO, or ~85% ORD WB FO. Both things I never thought would happen in ORD in the year 2023, but now I just get to have nightmares about it, during the day, because I’m hub turning at night. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands