![]() |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3625487)
Some of it was ok I guess but he's telling people that this is so they can "furlough" which won't happen here. 4a2c could happen but that'd require much more contraction than is forecast. It is possible that the 757 could drive the system average metrics down over time but they'd have to train this out first and go through the 4a2c process while losing airplanes and cancelling orders for new ones.
My guess is that we start hiring again next March or April after we see 200-300 guys leave in January and 200 people retire. |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3624055)
That's the confusing thing to me. We're only losing 2 jets, but we're losing Atlas flying for us and 200 CAs. The whole thing doesn't really make sense.
|
Originally Posted by MX727
(Post 3623989)
Quick spreadsheet with the numbers. Someone posted that using the max numbers that we would be overstaffed, we wouldn't. Negative numbers mean a gain in that seat. At the end of it all we are between 192 overstaffed and 134 understaffed. With planned retirements, pretty sure everyone's jobs are safe, just not their current seat.
I looked at your numbers and think I found an error. You show 75FM at 362 for Min/Max Staffing from the FCIF, but then you have 468 immediately below that in both spots. This gives a total of 5624. If you subtract out the extra 106 there you'll get back to the 5518 total I keep coming up with. And, being lazy I hadn't run the numbers in the current staffing levels, I was using the seniority number of 6009 being highest I could find so I had assumed we were 500 over manned. So if 5518 is correct (but maybe it isn't I just don't know where you got the additional numbers), then it looks like the numbers are 298 overstaffed using Min and 28 understaffed using Max. Gas |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3625487)
Some of it was ok I guess but he's telling people that this is so they can "furlough" which won't happen here. 4a2c could happen but that'd require much more contraction than is forecast. It is possible that the 757 could drive the system average metrics down over time but they'd have to train this out first and go through the 4a2c process while losing airplanes and cancelling orders for new ones.
My guess is that we start hiring again next March or April after we see 200-300 guys leave in January and 200 people retire. if you are junior and have ability to at least take a hard look elsewhere you’d be crazy not to do it - even with pax carriers history of furloughs and bankruptcy. Anyone who has been here for awhile and not looking through rose colored glasses realizes how different FedEx wants to take things. we won’t be hiring for several years at least. |
One thing I have not read here is the fact that before contract '15 we were short 680ish pilots. On Implementation day, that shortage was over.
If we give away efficiencies this CBA, the excess will be greater. Something to think about. |
For those who haven't seen what some are talking about look here
https://s21.q4cdn.com/665674268/file...esentation.pdf Specifically go to page 41. 30% REDUCTION in Pacific flying, INCREASED partner capacity, asset light...these aren't the things you want to be hearing going forward |
We’ll be hiring by Spring due to attrition and the mass exodus once the contract settles.
|
Originally Posted by 123456
(Post 3625595)
We’ll be hiring by Spring due to attrition and the mass exodus once the contract settles.
Let me poll the audience. |
Originally Posted by JackStraw
(Post 3625598)
You may have lost credibility when you said we’d be hiring by this summer.
Let me poll the audience. |
Originally Posted by 123456
(Post 3625595)
We’ll be hiring by Spring due to attrition and the mass exodus once the contract settles.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands