4a2c Overtime
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 22
From: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
The contract would be 20,000 pages if we had airtight language on every section. It’s not possible.
To solve that we need a level of trust that both sides will adhere to the negotiated intent. So what is that intent? Well for forever it has been unspoken and hasn’t been abused and it’s worked. Until the last 3 years.
Leave 4a2c language in place and draft up a 1 page memorandum of intent clearly laying out the purpose of it, when it can be implemented and more importantly when it cannot. And for the love of god write down the exact formula of the SAM and put in on paper with signatures.
To solve that we need a level of trust that both sides will adhere to the negotiated intent. So what is that intent? Well for forever it has been unspoken and hasn’t been abused and it’s worked. Until the last 3 years.
Leave 4a2c language in place and draft up a 1 page memorandum of intent clearly laying out the purpose of it, when it can be implemented and more importantly when it cannot. And for the love of god write down the exact formula of the SAM and put in on paper with signatures.
Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved.
#42
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 219
Likes: 22
I love how delicate you are in this post to keep 4A2C. I take it you’re junior and looking out for your best interest. May I suggest you put that same thought into our current pension plan. We all can win if we hang in there together.
Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved.
Don’t be so press to get rid of a pension plan many of us would like to keep. We just want it improved just as you want the language in 4a2c improved.
#43
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 22
From: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
#44
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
#45
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 219
Likes: 22
#46
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 595
Likes: 142
From: B767
I’d be careful treating assumptions as facts. You can’t possibly know most of us want to keep it. Most younger people I’ve talked to while at work would be okay getting rid of it.
#48
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 143
Likes: 20
it’s a disaster of a culture. no one can come together, no one knows how, every union leader is awful or has their own agenda or there is some conspiracy behind everything that they do or happens at the union. it’s old vs young, mil vs civilian, pension vs no pension, pax vs cargo, anti union vs unionists, draft fliers vs fly the line guys, company apologists vs non company men, it goes on and on. you’d think this place would have been through 100 mergers, much like American, with how screwed up the culture is. all this energy is focused on each other, all while being leap frogged by other airlines.
unfortunately, culture doesn’t change overnight, and it doesn’t seem like anyone really wants to look in the mirror and even inch their way in that direction. it’s a sad, sad example of how a union shouldn’t function. it’s gonna be the same for years until the ship gets turned. don’t see that happening anytime soon.
sigmund frog
#50
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 143
Likes: 20
exhibit A folks.
and yeah…hiring has always been awful here. now that the big secret is out (you know..the contract, culture, etc., is garbage), I’m willing to bet all the best will be beating on the doors at purple to fly a heavy once they spool up hiring again!
Freud frog
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



