Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Four years for this TA >

Four years for this TA

Search

Notices

Four years for this TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2015 | 04:32 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Rum Runner
Agree 100%!! An 18% B fund doesn't hold a candle to what we have now, even if you are young. Although, the lack of an increase in the A fund is my biggest reason for leaning NO at this point. But in fairness, I will wait to read the entire TA and attend the road shows before making final judgement.
Your assumption that the 18% B fund does not hold a candle to what we have now is only valid if the cap gets raised. If the cap does not get raised then 15 or 20 years down the road when pay tops out at 450K per year that A fund will look pretty chintzy and guys will be wishing they had that 18% tucked away somewhere. As the high 5 average creeps above 260K you are no longer effectively getting 2% per year, so you will effectively have the UPS A Fund without the UPS B Fund.

Now it is your turn to say well we just wont sign a deal unless we get a raise in the cap. Here is how I think it played out.

FDX went to the mediator and said we want PBS and they wont talk to us. The mediator says ALPA why wont you talk about PBS. ALPA says we like it the way it is. The mediator says suck it up FedEx.

Next FDX went to the mediator and said we want New hires off the A Fund and ALPA wont talk to us. The mediator says ALPA why wont you talk about the A Fund. ALPA says we like it the way it is no reason to change. The mediator says suck it up FedEx.

Next ALPA goes to the mediator and says we want the A Fund cap raised and FedEx wont talk to us. The mediator says FedEx why wont you talk about the A Fund cap. FedEx says says we like it the way it is no reason to change. The mediator says suck it up ALPA.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 05:35 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Commando
Your Joking, right? Or very misinformed with everything it seems. "FDX the most highly compensated for the next 4 years???"

Maybe 4 months.

DL, UAL, and UPS will be higher in the next year than a lame 10% cola raise. Your TA Hourly pay is below the Voted down DL TA already!

DL VOTED DOWN TA pay was $320 an Hour in Jan. 2017 vs. FDX TA at $295 in Oct. 2016. And it stays at that separation till 2021.

Please do some research before babbling incorrect info.
Hey, that's only $1600/mo or $20,000/yr. Who cares - we're all rich.

Pipe
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 05:51 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly
Other parts of our compensation are retirement, medical, work rules, etc. The "improvements" to retirement were incredibly small (1% B fund increase, and 1 more in 4 years)...
Thanks for the long discussion on why you don't like the TA, I certainly don't like a lot of it. I still say between our work rules (no PBS, vacation, sick bank, fatigue, pay for deadheads, etc), and our A Plan (how many are better) FEDEX pays as much or more for Pilots under this contract than anyone else and will for at least the next 4 years. They should we fly some of the most demanding trips and back side of the clock takes a big toll on us.

If I am wrong I am sure they will tell us at the roadshows.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 06:13 PM
  #44  
FDX1's Avatar
Contract 2021
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 4
From: 777 - Both
Default

Originally Posted by Commando

So just looking at your lame COLA raise after four years of talks and for the next 6 years, your Hourly is not close to "the highest compensation in the Airline Industry" for the next 4 years. Like I said earlier, it's already lower than a turned down TA.

And our Schedules do sux. But I'm not on a Domestic Bird doing Hub Turns. I do one leg to the Hotel.

Aren't you a UPS Pilot? Either way your ignorance and arrogance is staggering.


Please tell me one actual Airline Contract that has a higher rate than the proposed FedEx TA rate?

Don't worry, I'll save you the trouble...there isn't one! So yes, it will become an "Industry Leading" rate...if it gets approved. You really can't put Delta on the books. News Flash...It was voted down.

I'm thinking most guys you fly with appreciate one leg only with you.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 06:30 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 204
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Your assumption that the 18% B fund does not hold a candle to what we have now is only valid if the cap gets raised. If the cap does not get raised then 15 or 20 years down the road when pay tops out at 450K per year that A fund will look pretty chintzy and guys will be wishing they had that 18% tucked away somewhere. As the high 5 average creeps above 260K you are no longer effectively getting 2% per year, so you will effectively have the UPS A Fund without the UPS B Fund.

Now it is your turn to say well we just wont sign a deal unless we get a raise in the cap. Here is how I think it played out.

FDX went to the mediator and said we want PBS and they wont talk to us. The mediator says ALPA why wont you talk about PBS. ALPA says we like it the way it is. The mediator says suck it up FedEx.

Next FDX went to the mediator and said we want New hires off the A Fund and ALPA wont talk to us. The mediator says ALPA why wont you talk about the A Fund. ALPA says we like it the way it is no reason to change. The mediator says suck it up FedEx.

Next ALPA goes to the mediator and says we want the A Fund cap raised and FedEx wont talk to us. The mediator says FedEx why wont you talk about the A Fund cap. FedEx says says we like it the way it is no reason to change. The mediator says suck it up ALPA.
My math may be way off, and i'm sure someone will correct me if i'm wrong...but, when I crunch my numbers I come up with ~$370,000 average earnings required at 18% b fund and a 7% return each year to equal a 2%A / 9%B fund with the same 7% return using current pay rates. Just a wag though. I'd much rather keep what we have. BUT, the fact that the cap wasn't raised is huge in my opinion, and is concerning.

I do think that the conversation you listed may have been exactly how it went down.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 07:04 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not too thrilled with the TA, but one perspective I had with a UPS friend about payrates, is that our WB payrate encompasses a lot more pilots than the delta or American 777/747 rates. Only a few pilots will get those rates at those airlines.I would like to see what the 767 and 757 rates were in the delta ta that was turned down, and compare those to our narrow body payrate. I havent heard much discussion about that. Anyone have that info??
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 07:11 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: MD CA
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly
I would just like to see a good look at the numbers. We can all use a calculator and guess what inflation will be over 30 years, but I'd rather see an expert's numbers. Of course it will be a best guess. But what will 130k (minus survivor benefit if applicable) be worth in 2045? What would 16% times 30 years (at an average of 300k??) be worth? Of course the B fund rides the market (pilot determines risk), which could be really good or really bad depending on investment choices and market performance.

My take is that if we can't get an A fund improvement now (possibly the best time to negotiate a contract in the last decade), will we ever see an improvement?

I think most of us agree an A and B fund is the way to go. Sort of limits market risk and the A fund is a monthly check so you don't spend strictly from savings. But if the A fund isn't at least cost of living adjusted, what is it's real worth? I just think it's something to look at, that's all. I don't advocate throwing new hires under the bus, but will they see a better deal overall if they just have a higher paying B fund???
The 16% B Plan at 300K is really a 11% B plan for every Captain or anyone making 300K a year. This needs to be out there and educated to the masses. It's not because of the Federal Limits. I think the Total Contributions for the B Plan and 401K is around 50K per year. So once the 50K limit is Hit, the contributions stop.

So in reality the B-Plan of 16% is a 11-12% B Plan.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 07:15 PM
  #48  
Albief15's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by pipe
99.9% of the time I agree with Albie and he is often the voice of reason. I could be convinced that the smart move is to accept this and move on except for one MAJOR problem:

SIX YEARS!!

If it was a four year deal, one could lick their wounds and move on, mentally preparing for the next round. With this deal, it will account for half or more of our career for many of us. It's just not good enough for that (and I'm talking pay/retirement numbers only)

Pipe
Pipe,

I am on the fence. I want to hear from the dissenters their vision going forward if we kick it back.

I can live with current book for the next few years. Nobody is getting furloughed and the company isn't going into chapter 11 if we do not get a deal. If there is a solid, reasonable plan to get more I am listening. I like the deadheading and some work rule improvements, but just have a hard time not improving A plan for a mere 1% B plan bump.

I don't think the NMB is our ally right now. That does not mean a mandatory yes vote, however. I plan on listening to the road shows and asking a lot of questions.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 07:21 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Default

I would like to know what the options are, if we do end up kicking it back. If we have to negotiate for another two years, that's one year of a 10% pay raise, and one year of a 13% pay raise that we have to catch up on. How much better of a deal does it have to be to catch up on that?

Will the mediator stay with us, or give up? I hope that very soon, along with the specific details of this TA, that the union tells us what happens otherwise. I'd also like to hear from the negotiating committee. If they think they got the very best deal possible for us, it would be pretty depressing for them to hear all the negative comments about it. Before the specific details are even out.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 07:22 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: MD CA
Default

Originally Posted by FDX1

Aren't you a UPS Pilot? Either way your ignorance and arrogance is staggering.


Please tell me one actual Airline Contract that has a higher rate than the proposed FedEx TA rate?

Don't worry, I'll save you the trouble...there isn't one! So yes, it will become an "Industry Leading" rate...if it gets approved. You really can't put Delta on the books. News Flash...It was voted down.

I'm thinking most guys you fly with appreciate one leg only with you.

No. They Love It! lol- Since I'm not a push over like your Header says. "Contract Now?" Which implies you want a Contract Now and will take any Contract. Which is obvious from your Post. 10% Raise? Really? No wonder this profession has gone South with people like yourself thinking that this adequate for what we do. Sad.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coto Pilot
United
123
12-04-2012 06:47 PM
unclepetey
Regional
9
04-09-2008 03:03 PM
757Slug
Cargo
79
12-20-2007 07:44 AM
Plunder Hound
Major
6
03-11-2007 08:29 AM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
2
04-14-2006 04:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices