FDX - MOAB out!
#142
Perfect plan Walrus! . Seriously though, I will use your line.
Last edited by CloudSailor; 04-07-2016 at 12:11 AM.
#143
Of course I do. And, my previous post didnt come out quite they way I meant. As far as "talk about stuff", I meant bring up contract or Union issues or other related things to gauge their mindset.
And of course, no dinner.
#144
I disagree,
I do my job professionally, but there will be no talk about lots of stuff, no inquiries about previous jobs, family etc. Once at the layover, see ya at show time. The choice is about money, plain and simple. The list has dwindled, but there still is a list. I keep it on my iBooks on my phone.
I do my job professionally, but there will be no talk about lots of stuff, no inquiries about previous jobs, family etc. Once at the layover, see ya at show time. The choice is about money, plain and simple. The list has dwindled, but there still is a list. I keep it on my iBooks on my phone.
#148
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
I have a question about how the training for Bid 16-01 will be handled. Once this bid closes, will those individuals moving to new aircraft and positions be placed at the end of the current training letter or based on seniority, be merged? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
#150
For the POP experts:
If a current MEM 757FO is awarded MEM 767FO at 100%, with the expected training date of spring '17, and a newhire is placed in a MEM 767FO seat before spring '17, would that trigger POP? (Somehow I feel it's not as simple as this). Thanks.
If a current MEM 757FO is awarded MEM 767FO at 100%, with the expected training date of spring '17, and a newhire is placed in a MEM 767FO seat before spring '17, would that trigger POP? (Somehow I feel it's not as simple as this). Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post