Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Cirrus Standardized Instructor Program >

Cirrus Standardized Instructor Program

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Cirrus Standardized Instructor Program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2010, 03:30 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,825
Default

Long story about the parachute, but the airplane was actually built around it. It was going to have a parachute from the beginning. It had to do with a mid-air collision that one of the original founders of Cirrus was involved in. He lived, other guy didn't, and he promised that, if he ever built an airplane, it would have a parachute. It will recover from a spin. Had to be demonstrated for European certification.
AtlCSIP is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:56 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Comet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by wmuchickenhawk View Post
What's so bad about the stalls? Neither I, nor any of my students have had a problem with them, in fact I find it to be more docile than a 172.
As for the parachute, from what I've been told it was going to be added anyways so they had it also certified as the Spin recovery rather than spending extra money to do additional spin training.
noob again here
what's are the stall characteristics of the Cirrus? It stalls earlier than a 172?

a lot of Cirrus bashing going on here :S
and people hating on the parachute lol
Comet is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 06:04 AM
  #33  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Comet View Post
noob again here
what's are the stall characteristics of the Cirrus? It stalls earlier than a 172?

a lot of Cirrus bashing going on here :S
and people hating on the parachute lol
If you are reasonably coordinated the nose will barely drop and neither of the wings will drop (IME). The wing cuff design allows you to use some aileron to control the aircraft even when full stalled.
When I have students who are nervous about stalls I will sometimes show them a stall and maneuver the aircraft into gentle banks while fully stalled.
The biggest problem with the stall characteristics are that it can sometimes be difficult to recognize the stall. Because there is no nose or wing drop the first sign is usually full back-pressure with no gain in altitude.
wmuchickenhawk is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:16 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Comet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by wmuchickenhawk View Post
If you are reasonably coordinated the nose will barely drop and neither of the wings will drop (IME). The wing cuff design allows you to use some aileron to control the aircraft even when full stalled.
When I have students who are nervous about stalls I will sometimes show them a stall and maneuver the aircraft into gentle banks while fully stalled.
The biggest problem with the stall characteristics are that it can sometimes be difficult to recognize the stall. Because there is no nose or wing drop the first sign is usually full back-pressure with no gain in altitude.
no stall warning?
I can feel a stall coming when the C172 starts to shake like hell. I take it you don't have that feeling in the Cirrus?

thanks for the reply
I'm glad I get to learn from seasoned pros
Comet is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 07:38 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by aviator4hire View Post
I'd love to attend CSIP training, but DANG, is it EXPENSIVE! The flight school that I worked for (now defunct, bankrupt, and hopefully will not come back) had us flying the SR 20s and 22s (we were not CSIPs) with Chinese students at the stick. We were having most of them solo around 40 hours or so because of a wide variety of problems they had. I'd much rather have students learn how to get the basic flight skills and their private pilot license in something that is a ton more docile than a Cirrus. For most beginning students, it is way too much aircraft for them to handle and way to unforgiving (think tail strikes on landings). I think a better plane for beginners to fly (and much more cheaper) would be a ol Cessna 172 or Piper Warrior. No fancy avionics, standard 6 pack, simple systems that most students should be able to handle without much trouble. After the students get their private pilot license, then step up to the Cirrus for instrument training or advanced training. That's just my .02 cents before the fall of the rest of the economny or whichever way it is heading!
If you want to get primary students sitting behind a nice glass panel to look outside and fly the airplane there is a very easy and cheap solution. I just tape a newspaper over the entire panel. Takes away the urge to play the video game and forces them to just fly the airplane. They can look inside if they really want to but there is nothing there but the comics.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ewfflyer
Part 91 and Low Time
5
04-30-2010 05:20 AM
Precontact
Cargo
22
02-09-2010 06:53 AM
SrfNFly227
Part 135
3
02-07-2010 05:45 AM
F172Driver
Hangar Talk
9
01-20-2009 04:35 AM
cappelation
Flight Schools and Training
1
11-10-2008 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices