Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Thoughts on iPad for VFR Flight... >

Thoughts on iPad for VFR Flight...

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Thoughts on iPad for VFR Flight...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2014 | 08:34 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default Thoughts on iPad for VFR Flight...

So I'm renting 152's from a fairly large international flight school to build time. One of the policies there is that I have to have to use pilotage (lakes, cities,etc.) for my cross countries, in spite of me having a iPad with a external GPS.

Personally, I find this to be a hassle because IF the iPad did fail, I would still have a paper sectional for backup. I just don't see the point in wasting time using a plotter and calculating MH for even a short 20nm flight...not to mention I would be on FF and could ask ATC for a radar vector if it came down to that.

I just want to see y'alls view on this.
Reply
Old 08-31-2014 | 08:43 PM
  #2  
Nextlife's Avatar
Slowing to holding speed
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: middle seat
Default

Originally Posted by KF5OVP
So I'm renting 152's from a fairly large international flight school to build time. One of the policies there is that I have to have to use pilotage (lakes, cities,etc.) for my cross countries, in spite of me having a iPad with a external GPS.

Personally, I find this to be a hassle because IF the iPad did fail, I would still have a paper sectional for backup. I just don't see the point in wasting time using a plotter and calculating MH for even a short 20nm flight...not to mention I would be on FF and could ask ATC for a radar vector if it came down to that.

I just want to see y'alls view on this.
Pilotage is flying off the sectional using lakes, cities, etc to figure out where you are on the map. As far as my understanding of the term, you're fine navigating map to ground without having measured courses. That being said, makes sense if they are going to have a blanket policy for all cross countries (short and long) to make sure renters demonstrate they know where they're going and how much gas they're going to burn etc. Gotta think that flight schools make their rules for the lowest common denominator in renters and not the experienced pilot.
Reply
Old 08-31-2014 | 09:33 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Window Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Nextlife
Gotta think that flight schools make their rules for the lowest common denominator in renters and not the experienced pilot.
Reminds me of the time an F-15 pilot ran a 152 out of gas.

In general (directed at everybody) if you have a problem with navigating the "old way" if someone asks you to please get out of aviation now.
Reply
Old 08-31-2014 | 10:59 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KF5OVP
So I'm renting 152's from a fairly large international flight school to build time. One of the policies there is that I have to have to use pilotage (lakes, cities,etc.) for my cross countries, in spite of me having a iPad with a external GPS.

Personally, I find this to be a hassle because IF the iPad did fail, I would still have a paper sectional for backup. I just don't see the point in wasting time using a plotter and calculating MH for even a short 20nm flight...not to mention I would be on FF and could ask ATC for a radar vector if it came down to that.

I just want to see y'alls view on this.
Assuming you have at least a PPL, this seems a bit strange as a blanket policy. Typically as a student you should learn and be versed in Pilotage (Landmarks) and Dead Reckoning skills (Time/Speed/Distance) navigation. Most VFR X countries merge these methods (ETA to the landmark, Etc.) Was there something that prompted this, such as an instructor noticing an overreliance on the GPS? Additionally, What if... FF dropped you or you had a communications or even total electrical failure. All these and more will eventually happen, I pretty much guarantee it.

Last edited by Yoda2; 08-31-2014 at 11:14 PM. Reason: additional
Reply
Old 08-31-2014 | 11:20 PM
  #5  
Flyboyxc91's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Captain CL-65
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi
Reminds me of the time an F-15 pilot ran a 152 out of gas.

In general (directed at everybody) if you have a problem with navigating the "old way" if someone asks you to please get out of aviation now.
^^^THIS... If your all about your GPS then fine, but I wanna fly with people that I know has all the knowledge of the backup to the backup because thats truly why they say "A good pilot is always learning" and if you didn't learn that then I'm not so sure what you did... Accident Chain
Reply
Old 09-01-2014 | 01:36 AM
  #6  
OnCenterline's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

If you are a VFR-only pilot, use the windows (that's why you learned to fly, isn't it? The view?) and a watch, along with a map. Save the GPS for the IFR flying.

One day, you will yearn for the opportunity to fly a plane that only requires sunglasses and a headset.
Reply
Old 09-01-2014 | 01:52 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: G550 & CL300 PIC
Default

Originally Posted by OnCenterline
One day, you will yearn for the opportunity to fly a plane that only requires sunglasses and a headset.
So true. I want to fly somewhere at 500' using a sectional, my eyes, and a clock.
Reply
Old 09-01-2014 | 07:53 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

My point is that I prefer to go direct. I feel like if the iPad did fail, I still would have a sectional to look at, VOR,etc. I don't see the need in plotting courses. And I know how much gas I'm consuming. I can plot direct, I don't want to plot waypoints.
Reply
Old 09-01-2014 | 01:53 PM
  #9  
OnCenterline's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by KF5OVP
My point is that I prefer to go direct. I feel like if the iPad did fail, I still would have a sectional to look at, VOR,etc. I don't see the need in plotting courses. And I know how much gas I'm consuming. I can plot direct, I don't want to plot waypoints.
Okay, I don't normally say something like this on APC, but there are 2 places I hope you don't wind up: on my seniority list, or in management.
Reply
Old 09-02-2014 | 03:47 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Window Seat
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingNasaForm
So true. I want to fly somewhere at 500' using a sectional, my eyes, and a clock.
North! To Alaska!

Originally Posted by KF5OVP
My point is that I prefer to go direct. I feel like if the iPad did fail, I still would have a sectional to look at, VOR,etc. I don't see the need in plotting courses. And I know how much gas I'm consuming. I can plot direct, I don't want to plot waypoints.
Get out of aviation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
02-05-2013 08:00 AM
glyde
Major
121
11-11-2011 02:31 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices