Stop calling it 121
#41
Since IBI went into effect in December of 2018 the attrition rate has slowed to less than 10 per month. Most of those are retirements. Anyone under 5 years of service are new hires that did not make it off of probation. As always there may be an exception.
#42
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 53
I would argue many reasons.
One is QOL is subjective but is so much better when one feels they have control over when and where they work. You need to be at football game to coach the kids at at 1800 you can arrange that at a 121 scheduled carrier, no such luck at NJA.
Two, the pay as a senior FO at NK is, talking to the FOs that jumpseat with us, above that of 7/7 pay at NJA for a captain for same amount of days.
Three, Retirement income is a 100 times better at all majors than at NJA. That’s figuratively not literally please...
Four, planning your career progression is easier at a 121 carrier as you know at age 65/67 they punch out while at NJA you got gunners approaching 85 still chugging along.
Lastly, off topic but on the major forums you rarely run into cheerleaders for the company that try to blow sunshine up your butt. It’s honest discussion about the good and the bad about a company. Once again it’s an honest discussion and no lies.
Take care brah!
One is QOL is subjective but is so much better when one feels they have control over when and where they work. You need to be at football game to coach the kids at at 1800 you can arrange that at a 121 scheduled carrier, no such luck at NJA.
Two, the pay as a senior FO at NK is, talking to the FOs that jumpseat with us, above that of 7/7 pay at NJA for a captain for same amount of days.
Three, Retirement income is a 100 times better at all majors than at NJA. That’s figuratively not literally please...
Four, planning your career progression is easier at a 121 carrier as you know at age 65/67 they punch out while at NJA you got gunners approaching 85 still chugging along.
Lastly, off topic but on the major forums you rarely run into cheerleaders for the company that try to blow sunshine up your butt. It’s honest discussion about the good and the bad about a company. Once again it’s an honest discussion and no lies.
Take care brah!
#43
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 66
I am curious how AQP will lower upgrade time. Does not AQP reduce the overall training footprint, requiring fewer pilots to do the same work?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#44
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 53
AQP lowers the amount of training per year. The IBI reduced the amount of pilots needed to fly the same amount of flights.
#46
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 378
That’s exactly how upgrades will drop from 13 years to 6-7.
Reallocation of simulator capacity.
#47
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 378
Any anyone leaving for greener pastures prior to that... well, hopefully they left because they KNEW it was for the right reasons.
You can’t have it both ways.
Upgrade coming down and pay/retirement going up are great trends.
#49
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 53
It doesn’t. The point of AQP for NJA is to keep more resources on the line, and out of the school house. It is NOT so NJA can upgrade more people for no reason, that’s downright absurd.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Chrysler Pacifica
Posts: 203
Retractable is pushing the kool aid hard these days. Take everything he says with a HUGE grain of salt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post