Planesense
#1531
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
It is an interesting quandary. Our POI would disagree, and the document you posted sums it up nicely at the end.
“In summary, the person who is pilot-in-command may log PIC, others may also log PIC depending on the circumstances.”
I did a pretty exhaustive search of the FAA legal interpretations and couldn’t find an exact case that covers this. However, I think you would be hard pressed to find a FSDO that would not allow the PIC designated by a certificate holder to not log PIC if he is not physically manipulating the controls on a company assigned flight. (Apologies for the triple negative)
I read about a case of enforcement action involving two pilots in a King Air 200 and the logging vs acting of PIC, but I couldn’t find the actual document.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“In summary, the person who is pilot-in-command may log PIC, others may also log PIC depending on the circumstances.”
I did a pretty exhaustive search of the FAA legal interpretations and couldn’t find an exact case that covers this. However, I think you would be hard pressed to find a FSDO that would not allow the PIC designated by a certificate holder to not log PIC if he is not physically manipulating the controls on a company assigned flight. (Apologies for the triple negative)
I read about a case of enforcement action involving two pilots in a King Air 200 and the logging vs acting of PIC, but I couldn’t find the actual document.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Write the POI then, get a LOI and you can go down in history as the guy who put this debate to bed forever!
At the end of the day it's kind of an unimportant debate because the FAA only really cares about logging towards a rating and once you have 1500 hours you're not getting closer to another rating. The airlines would all certainly count it as PIC. It's kind of a fun thought exercise.
#1532
As that "thought exercise", a few weeks ago I sat down with a Flight Standards guy and had this very discussion. He agreed that the P135 PIC (on the dispatch/manifest, etc...) could log 'Acting PIC' while the SIC could log PIC as sole manipulator on P91 legs. A co-worker, and former ASI, disagreed with him. We went back to the office and did some more searching and my co-worker has now changed his opinion on what he found to agree with the Flight Standards guy. I didn't keep a copy of what he found which changed his mind, but I'll ask him about it. Just another datapoint in this on-going debate.
#1533
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
As that "thought exercise", a few weeks ago I sat down with a Flight Standards guy and had this very discussion. He agreed that the P135 PIC (on the dispatch/manifest, etc...) could log 'Acting PIC' while the SIC could log PIC as sole manipulator on P91 legs. A co-worker, and former ASI, disagreed with him. We went back to the office and did some more searching and my co-worker has now changed his opinion on what he found to agree with the Flight Standards guy. I didn't keep a copy of what he found which changed his mind, but I'll ask him about it. Just another datapoint in this on-going debate.
#1534
#1535
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Doesn't your 135 company manual say somewhere that you will operate all legs as 135 with the following exceptions? Ex. 135 O2 requirements. 135 communication requirements? Or 135 landing distance requirements? If so then all your legs are actually 135 and you can reduce them to 91 mins if it states that you can.
#1536
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Doesn't your 135 company manual say somewhere that you will operate all legs as 135 with the following exceptions? Ex. 135 O2 requirements. 135 communication requirements? Or 135 landing distance requirements? If so then all your legs are actually 135 and you can reduce them to 91 mins if it states that you can.
#1538
On Reserve
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Morning folks, anyone headed to Daytona for the onsite interviews on the 8th and 9th? I think I might head up that way and check things out. Can anyone tell me what these onsite events are like. I assume it will be a very similar setup as the HQ locations with a HR segment, a Tech segment, and potentially a sim session? If so, do you all know what the sim is to be used. I have never actually spent any time in a sim and was wondering what they used in case I could find one around south Florida to check out before I would head up there later next week?
Thanks all
KC
Thanks all
KC
#1539
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Morning folks, anyone headed to Daytona for the onsite interviews on the 8th and 9th? I think I might head up that way and check things out. Can anyone tell me what these onsite events are like. I assume it will be a very similar setup as the HQ locations with a HR segment, a Tech segment, and potentially a sim session? If so, do you all know what the sim is to be used. I have never actually spent any time in a sim and was wondering what they used in case I could find one around south Florida to check out before I would head up there later next week?
Thanks all
KC
Thanks all
KC
Good luck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





