Planesense
#2121
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 504
Likes: 12
#2123
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Hello, PlaneSense crews...
Just wondering if anyone would care to share about any recent interview experiences with PlaneSense. Is the progression from a phone or Skype interview to an in-person interview in Portsmouth, NH? Any sim check? Thanks!
Just wondering if anyone would care to share about any recent interview experiences with PlaneSense. Is the progression from a phone or Skype interview to an in-person interview in Portsmouth, NH? Any sim check? Thanks!
#2125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2126
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
The mission fit is not a good FTD. Careers are ruined with that thing. $3M they paid and it's just not a good FTD. They tried doing "checkrides" in it and everyone was washing out. It's pretty for what it is, a flow trainer. Touch function is off the charts bad. Just my opinion.
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2128
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
So, since you say mainly direct entry captains... Is it fair to say that first officer applicants might be given a little more leeway on the FTD check?
#2129
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: FO
It’s a nice thought, but the mission fit is dirt cheap to operate compared to a Level D sim. Initial cost is high, but it works how it is intended to work and has lower recurring costs.
I doubt that “careers were ruined” as a result of using the mission fit. The mission fit does not substitute any portion of the checkride; it shouldn’t be reported in a PRIA request by a future air carrier.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



