Search
Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

Planesense

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2020, 05:22 AM
  #2231  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Natca's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by tanker View Post
The new hires are mostly FOs and I’m not sure what the washout rate is.
Im sorry but I have to be that guy, if your worried about washing out from a PC12 gig as a captain then its probably not the right gig for you maybe? I mean its full flap landing speed is that of a 172.
Natca is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 05:24 AM
  #2232  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 29
Default

Those who are/were getting callbacks, where were you at flight time wise?
Ulramar is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 09:18 AM
  #2233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by Natca View Post
Im sorry but I have to be that guy, if your worried about washing out from a PC12 gig as a captain then its probably not the right gig for you maybe? I mean its full flap landing speed is that of a 172.
It was mentioned up thread that DEC's were having issues, and that a less than stellar sim might be contributing.
Being a DEC brings with it certain additional challenges as well, like not having the opportunity to gain the collective wisdom of a flight department before being put into the hot seat.
At a previous regional airline 60% of DEC's got washed out in IOE, and that's from people who have benefited from 121 training, many more than once.
In this industry you should ALWAYS be worried about washouts. Many good pilots have stalled their careers because of being washed out for one reason or another. Sometimes, it's even attributed by a poor culture from within the training department. Several airlines have even had the distinction of being known to purposely wash people out.
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 09:45 AM
  #2234  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Ulramar View Post
Those who are/were getting callbacks, where were you at flight time wise?
I'm near IFR mins. The communication others have been receiving from HR falls in line with that I've been told as well.
BaldEagleSq is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 09:45 AM
  #2235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes View Post
It was mentioned up thread that DEC's were having issues, and that a less than stellar sim might be contributing.
Being a DEC brings with it certain additional challenges as well, like not having the opportunity to gain the collective wisdom of a flight department before being put into the hot seat.
At a previous regional airline 60% of DEC's got washed out in IOE, and that's from people who have benefited from 121 training, many more than once.
In this industry you should ALWAYS be worried about washouts. Many good pilots have stalled their careers because of being washed out for one reason or another. Sometimes, it's even attributed by a poor culture from within the training department. Several airlines have even had the distinction of being known to purposely wash people out.
Here we go again with blaming training departments for washing pilots out of training. Part of training's job is evaluating pilots and for those that don't meet the standards, THEY GET WASHED OUT. That's the way it's suppose to work. Be prepared, current, and proficient and there's no reason to wash out. Are the instructors d***heads? So what, as long as they're going by the book.
For the regionals washing out DECs, there's a far greater chance those candidates didn't meet the standards or flubbed up their orals or checkrides. It doesn't mean they're bad guys or pilots. However, it also doesn't mean that instructors are intentionally trying to fail pilots they need to hire. There is no incentive for that and DPEs have to explain in great detail (and paperwork) why pilots fail checkrides.
Bottom line, about 90% of the time, it's the pilot's fault for failing. Sadly, instead of learning from their mistakes and owning up to it, they choose to complain about the unfairness of the training department and how badly they were treated. Fact is, many of the washouts struggled early on in training, but managed to squeak by as first officers. When upgrade time came, they weren't ready.
MidnightHauler is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 10:06 AM
  #2236  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by MidnightHauler View Post
Here we go again with blaming training departments for washing pilots out of training. Part of training's job is evaluating pilots and for those that don't meet the standards, THEY GET WASHED OUT. That's the way it's suppose to work. Be prepared, current, and proficient and there's no reason to wash out. Are the instructors d***heads? So what, as long as they're going by the book.
For the regionals washing out DECs, there's a far greater chance those candidates didn't meet the standards or flubbed up their orals or checkrides. It doesn't mean they're bad guys or pilots. However, it also doesn't mean that instructors are intentionally trying to fail pilots they need to hire. There is no incentive for that and DPEs have to explain in great detail (and paperwork) why pilots fail checkrides.
Bottom line, about 90% of the time, it's the pilot's fault for failing. Sadly, instead of learning from their mistakes and owning up to it, they choose to complain about the unfairness of the training department and how badly they were treated. Fact is, many of the washouts struggled early on in training, but managed to squeak by as first officers. When upgrade time came, they weren't ready.
There is no blame being levied. I'm well aware of how a good flight training department is supposed to run, but that certainly isn't the case everywhere. Some of the lesser regional do carry a certain reputation, whether deserved or not it's hard to say. But knowing of any potential issues ahead of time would still be valuable, especially is there is a pattern for where the sticking point lays.
The 60% washout rate at the regional I was referencing occurred during IOE. Meaning that they had passed the check ride already, but not been signed off for the fed ride. This particular regional had developed some issues with mgmt trying to rush through an applicant in training because they were so short staffed. Many times they were offering TWICE the sim time to get them through. The instructors were by in large great people, but were ridden by the head of training (who had been hired from flight safety, without airline experience). It took our IOE Captains to put their foot down and save the company from themselves. In my time there, I saw a training department go from excellent to substandard luckily the company came to it's senses and put a much more qualified person in charge of the department.
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 10:54 AM
  #2237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 441
Default

There was a time that DECs (mainly retired 121 Captains) had a high washout rate. However in 2018 they changed the DEC program. Now you are hired and paid as a DEC but you are initially trained as a FO. You then get 3 rotations as an FO before you go into the normal upgrade process. This gives the DEC a chance to learn the aircraft and the work before having to check out as a Captain. This has greatly reduced the DEC washout rate. Now the majority of washouts are FOs in academic training or in the Mission Fit. Once they get to the sim at DFW very few washout.
tanker is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 03:07 PM
  #2238  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by BaldEagleSq View Post
I'm near IFR mins. The communication others have been receiving from HR falls in line with that I've been told as well.
Are they looking for everything in 135.243 or just the total time requirements? 500 XC is a challenge.
Ulramar is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 03:23 PM
  #2239  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Ulramar View Post
Are they looking for everything in 135.243 or just the total time requirements? 500 XC is a challenge.
I can't speak to exactly what they look for, but remember: §135.243 doesn't specify a distance for the use of the term cross country, meaning any point-to-point flight qualifies as cross-country time.

See §61.1(b) above.
BaldEagleSq is offline  
Old 05-26-2020, 03:25 PM
  #2240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 452
Default

Originally Posted by Ulramar View Post
Are they looking for everything in 135.243 or just the total time requirements? 500 XC is a challenge.
How much time do you have XC?

Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
JMO127 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Geronimo4497
Fractional
12
02-10-2006 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices