![]() |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 4001170)
Your lack of acknowledgement towards scale and the power of the CC program has always been a curious interest to me when it’s clearly wrong.
Its possible this is why were Jetblue, Frontier, Spirit all profitable when they were small without scale and now that they are larger they are struggling? Spirit didn't start losing money until it got "scale". Scale is only a single factor in how a business operates. WeWork had scale. It also lost money at scale. How much scale do United and Delta actually need? CC programs are a red herring. So much misinformation and too much weight placed on their actual profit value. Its like when I was told as a new hire in the 90s that we could fly empty planes and make money because we carried so much US Mail. It was completely hyperbole. Nothing you are saying correlates to what's happening in the marketplace. If getting bigger for the sake of getting bigger was necessary United and Delta would have already bought up all the other decent airlines. Jetblue is a decent airline, but its still operating like its 2015 and hasn't pivoted, just like the ULCCs haven't pivoted. Scale didn't help Blockbuster or Sears. They also didn't pivot when they needed to. Why don't Frontier, Jetblue and Spirit just merge into one big airline. They'd have scale, right? They'd be able to "compete with United and Delta finally". But would they make money or just lose more money at scale. Are any passengers flying to Asia Europe or Hawaii flying on ULCCs? Maybe a couple on Jetblue? What about premium travelers from coast to coast? Only so make people want to fly from Raleigh to Orlando. You need product-market fit, a viable business plan and relentless execution to make money in any business. You just keep shouting "but scale" but that's an incredibly superficial way to look at how businesses make a profit, especially ones that only serve a small niche, ultra discount passengers, and don't really offer a destination that almost every other airline in the US can fly to efficiently. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 4001182)
I'm not ignoring scale at all. Scale is meaningless if you are not using is to create economies of scale. And just what do you suppose those merger attempts were for? Fun? It’s also meaningless in a segmented market. You presume but dont know this as fact. I disagree with your presumtion. This means it’s a market where the total addressable revenue from the segment you are competing in is limited. So maybe "discount air travelers" is really just a limited segment, I disagree. and once the ULCCs have captured effectively all of that market, scaling doesn't do anything because just because you are growing doesn't mean more people magically enter the supply side of your market. BE grew the ULCC market by a factor of 5? 10? If anything the passenger segment of ULCC is bigger than it has ever been.
It’s possible this is why were Jetblue, Frontier, Spirit all profitable when they were small without scale and now that they are larger they are struggling? Spirit didn't start losing money until it got "scale". Spirit lost money after Covid due to the advent of Basic economy, underutilization, fuel prices, labor prices, Pratt engines, and poor performance in various ways. I often argue that Frontier loses most of its money based on its own poor performance with unreliability. Also, this is likely a large factor toward the American lack of profits. Actually I would bet one of the main reasons AA makes money at all is their massive scale. That if a Frontier or Spirit were the size of AA this conversation would be more in line with Ryan air vs Lufthansa group. Scale is only a single factor in how a business operates. WeWork had scale. It also lost money at scale. How much scale do United and Delta actually need? I don’t know. Let’s ask Scott about Chicago and ask how scale will affect his market size there. Let’s see how large Daddy Delta watches UA get before they say nuh, uh, uh…you didn’t say the magic word. CC programs are a red herring. So much misinformation and too much weight placed on their actual profit value. And you cannot place a value on the psychology of the CC. Its like when I was told as a new hire in the 90s that we could fly empty planes and make money because we carried so much US Mail. It was completely hyperbole. Nothing you What am I saying? are saying correlates to what's happening in the marketplace. If getting bigger for the sake of getting bigger was necessary United and Delta would have already bought up all the other decent Underhanded jab…Nice! airlines. Jetblue is a decent airline, but it’s still operating like it’s 2015 and hasn't pivoted, just like the ULCCs haven't pivoted. Frontier has pivoted. Just not to what you like. Execution was/is poor. Future execution TBD. Scale didn't help Blockbuster or Sears. They also didn't pivot when they needed to. Yes but they also weren’t in a capacity constrained industry that is highly regulated. If Space X could safely fly passengers tomorrow across the ocean United would be dead by the end of the decade. Why don't Frontier, Jetblue and Spirit just merge into one big airline. One merger at a time Friendo. Also, you can’t say it’s for a lack of trying. They'd have scale, right? They'd be able to "compete with United and Delta finally". But would they make money or just lose more money at scale. Unfortunately we probably won’t get to know Are any passengers flying to Asia Europe or Hawaii flying on ULCCs? Yes but they are admittedly smaller carriers and generally not profitable. Maybe they need some domestic ULCC code shares to feed their seats!? Maybe a couple on Jetblue? What about premium travelers from coast to coast? Only so make people want to fly from Raleigh to Orlando. And yet sometimes they chose us. Weird huh? You need product-market fit, a viable business plan and relentless execution to make money in any business. You A little extra personal again when I don’t recall shouting just keep shouting "but scale" but that's an incredibly superficial I was trying to open a Friendly discussion and boy did I get you riled up way to look at how businesses make a profit, especially ones that only serve a small niche, Maybe our definition of small is different. Maybe yours is 737 cabin width and mine is 320 cabin width ultra discount passengers, and don't really offer a destination that almost every other airline in the US can fly to efficiently. Well not as efficiently as Americas greenest fleet am I right?! Heyoooo! |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 4001190)
Okay, just as a recap, it seems you think ULCCs are the worst.
If what you say is true, why isn't it happening? And why is all the stuff I'm saying happening instead? Nobody would stop anyone from buying Spirit, but they aren't buying it. I wonder why that is? Too expensive for what value they would bring maybe? But if its only able "scale" then all the airlines should be trying to buy them, but they aren't. Because its not all about scale. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 4001190)
Okay, just as a recap, it seems you think ULCCs are the worst.
|
You guys really should bail. Remember all the posts of ex-Spirit captains saying they used to tell FOs to leave and now they’re junior to them by thousands? Rinse and repeat here. Frontier is done. Probably oversized for what it can financially generate, meaning all that seniority you’ve accrued will someday get eaten up when the lion comes home to roost. I’m officially out of here in just a few days.
Future looks bright at United, Delta, Alaska, and maybe even Southwest. Proud to say I’m joining one while aspiring yet to make another. I wish my friends here the best in getting out; things indeed are bleak as ****. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 4001190)
Okay, just as a recap, it seems you think ULCCs are the worst.
In this oligopoly of 4 viable airlines, none of the others are in a position to increase market share (unless they have some sort of niche the Big 4 can't fill - like Allegiant). Market share increase may not be necessary to be profitable but those in charge of the rest don't seem to be smart enough to position their airlines to do so. Say what you want about DL and UA but their CEOs are outsmarting the rest. Despite the subsidiary factions associated w/ running an airline and CC rewards program, there is still something to be said about the person who offers a good product that people want that makes a profit. F9 made MANY crucial strategic decisions (no wifi, widespread network, only 2 different seating configs, etc) early on that have proved to be VERY poor. I'm sure all of the others have similar stories. The best thing that could happen for all the rest would be some national black swan or major industry event that changes the desires of air travelers to need cheaper (non-comfort) air travel. Both UA and DL will need to take on debt to update their fleets (what AA already did) so there is some risk to their game but even with that, their scale is such that they can pivot as needed and/or wouldn't be allowed to fail by the US govt. Scale is important but only to the point where it allows adequate balance of product offering. Those w/ scale that fail generally either emphasized certain parts of it incorrectly. It's funny how we all see the game has changed in the last 6-9 years yet we all continued to do the same thing and "hope" for better. How BB kept his job that long is mind-blowing but all that matters now is what Dumpster does next. Every airline that ever went under had a CEO making millions thinking they were good at their job. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 4001191)
Its a business model that doesn't work as well anymore. That market segment has been fully exploited again we disagree and the entrance of the Big 3 adding basic economy to their massive fleets washed the profit of that segment out of the industry for airlines where that is their sole source of income. Yes an overcapacity situation diluted the ticket prices for sure. It proved that consumers, when faced with a choice between no frills/smaller network, and the benefits of a major network airline <this is a joke right? Youre stating the importance of Legacy scale as a reason to say that ULCC scale isn’t important? have decided to choose the major airlines instead. This is why Andrew Nocella called the ULCC "spill carriers". It’s an apt name. Spirit, Frontier and others are fighting each other over that spill. “Maybe they should join up and stop fighting each other.” -Everybody since 2022 That's why ULCC stocks are going up as the likelyhood of Spirit going away is increasing, and going up far more as a percentage than the full service network carriers.
If what you say is true, why isn't it happening? Do you mean the merger that would have happened in 2022 if not for JetBlue? Or the merger that would have happened in 2024 if not for the DOT? Or maybe the merger that may have happened in 2025 if not for the creditors? Or maybe the merger that happened in 2025. Or maybe the merger that is happening in 2026? And why is all the stuff I'm saying happening instead? See above. Nobody would stop anyone from buying Spirit, but they aren't buying it. I wonder why that is? Too expensive for what value they would bring maybe? Yes value is the key important factor with Spirit. This is elementary. But if its only Who said only?able "scale" then all the airlines should be trying to buy them, but they aren't. Again you’re ignoring a few have tried and some more than once. The value proposition has changed dramatically over the last few years. Because it’s not all about scale. It’s like running marathon without shoes. Not necessary but it sure freaking helps! |
Originally Posted by RStrawberry
(Post 4001236)
You guys really should bail. Remember all the posts of ex-Spirit captains saying they used to tell FOs to leave and now they’re junior to them by thousands? Rinse and repeat here. Frontier is done. Probably oversized for what it can financially generate, meaning all that seniority you’ve accrued will someday get eaten up when the lion comes home to roost. I’m officially out of here in just a few days.
Future looks bright at United, Delta, Alaska, and maybe even Southwest. Proud to say I’m joining one while aspiring yet to make another. I wish my friends here the best in getting out; things indeed are bleak as ****. |
The last few pages have mostly been a great discussion.
Ive been at Frontier for well over a decade and have seen this business model go from extremely profitable to questionable for long term survival. The model hasn't changed at all, but the economy and market has. I do believe that there's absolutely a place in the market for Frontier (or insert generic ULCC) but the current market isn't favorable to the model. Times change, markets change and economies change. I don't know what the future holds, but I don't think the crazy, post covid spending spree this country has been on for the last 5 years will last forever. I don't know that the economy turns in our favor again or not, but it sure might. One thing I do find pretty interesting though is that the entire profitability of the industry is made by just 2 airlines, United and Delta. They just seem to have cracked the code. I think that as an industry with 10 major airlines and only 2 making good money is awful strange and concerning. Apparently, it's all the credit card and loyalty programs making the money. AA lost 5 Billion flying the planes and made 5 Billion on the credit card program. That's f-cked. I don't think that is a good thing for the industry. They just broke even. JetBlue is bleeding out Spirit is bleeding out AA just barely staying above water Frontier is bleeding, just not fatally Southwest is doing OK for now but in the process of alienating their loyal customers. No one knows how that will play out. United and Delta are absolutely crushing it. I don't think it's going to stay that way forever. Keep saving money folks. If you're aren't putting money in your 401k, you probably should be. |
Originally Posted by bluespoon
(Post 4001231)
Everyone thinks that. That’s the problem.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands