Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Frontier (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/)
-   -   News thread (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/143145-news-thread.html)

fcoolaiddrinker 02-01-2026 06:56 PM


Originally Posted by dracir1 (Post 3999327)
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.

The only downside is to roughly half of voting members. Lol. Yeah good luck. The next bottom 25% captains are a no as well. How are downgrades, displacements, furloughs handled? Some contracts have bump and flush some don’t ect..


Shrek 02-02-2026 07:13 AM

Bwahahahaha - will never happen……

DumboDrop 02-02-2026 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by Shrek (Post 3999464)
Bwahahahaha - will never happen……

Exactly. What a useless debate.

BagMan 02-02-2026 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by dracir1 (Post 3999327)
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.


I am not on board with the once a Captain always a Captain Idea. To me Captain that conveys mastery of the aircraft (type Specific) and as such just because you were flying a 787 does not mean you should be able to go straight to Captain on a A220 If you don't have time on that aircraft. Granted any time there is a new airplane type some one has to be the first to fly it. This is where the 787 pilot would shine. Not because he flew a 787 ,but because of the sheer number of aircraft type ratings he has just getting to the 787 shows a level of competence, dedication ,and experience that lines up with the "putting your best foot forward principal". If that guy wants to fly a common type he has never flown. He should start as an FO because it in impossible to truly master an Aircraft you have 0 hours in.

BagMan 02-02-2026 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by dracir1 (Post 3999327)
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.

It could work the way you think, or it could work completely differently. A lot of horse trading needs to happen to iron out those details. I do like the Idea that your thinking about it. None of this is written in stone (or even on paper far as I know) at this point The main advantage being better use of our Union Dues, More power at the bargaining table. and uniform pay, bennies & work rules.

rickair7777 02-02-2026 10:34 PM


Originally Posted by Shrek (Post 3999464)
Bwahahahaha - will never happen……


Originally Posted by DumboDrop (Post 3999483)
Exactly. What a useless debate.

This. Not happening.

spooldup 02-03-2026 06:33 AM

Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?

Scrapdaddy 02-03-2026 06:38 AM

SJU is closing, probably CVG and MIA. Possibly one west coast. We shouldn’t have had this may bases to begin with. Finally seniority will mean something.

DumboDrop 02-03-2026 06:39 AM


Originally Posted by spooldup (Post 3999865)
Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?

He also said "some will like it."

A better loyalty program and a focus on not ****ing people off so they come back. Hope it works.

RStrawberry 02-03-2026 06:53 AM


Originally Posted by spooldup (Post 3999865)
Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?

New once a week service to Iceland, 15 A330Ns, 1st class seating and Wifi.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands