Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Pilot Extremist Behavior & Ramifications >

Pilot Extremist Behavior & Ramifications

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Pilot Extremist Behavior & Ramifications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2021, 03:09 PM
  #21  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Arturito View Post
Another pilot identified, albeit not civilian (or maybe he was after the military career)

https://www.foxnews.com/us/air-force...s-senate-floor
He appears to have a 73 type and a current 1C, so I'm guessing he's an airline guy. Hope he's called the union already.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 03:33 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by WickedSmaht View Post
I understand the concern over posting openly racist comments, a stated desire to cause physical harm to a person or persons, wanting to overthrow the government, harassment..etc. There's NO place for any of that, I think we can all agree on that. However we should also all be concerned when donating to a legitimate political campaign is used against you even if you don't care for the candidate or campaign, I hope we also agree on that. Today it's MAGA supporters, tomorrow it's moderates and then it continues to move the left and the right. The article mentions identifying him by that very means and frankly? That's not a very good place to be.

We should all remember Martin Niemöller's quote - First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

He’s not being called out for supporting Trump. His donation was merely used to confirm that he’s employed by Allegiant. He’s being targeted right now for his affiliation with a violent extremist group not because he supports MAGA.
DoubleUp686 is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 03:49 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Sic semper tomato
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleUp686 View Post
He’s not being called out for supporting Trump. His donation was merely used to confirm that he’s employed by Allegiant. He’s being targeted right now for his affiliation with a violent extremist group not because he supports MAGA.
Understood, and rightfully so. My point being that in the article the author notes that the captain in question was partially identified by his campaign contributions to Trump. I opine that should not be a factor for anyone and there is concern that those very records will be used to marginalize (or worse) anyone who gave $25 bucks to Trump and had it recorded on a federally mandated list who's intent is not to compile information for that purpose. We should not be using that information to use as a cudgel in anyone's professional life. Again, this particular case is a different animal and I have no issue with that. This guy seems to be missing a few neurons regardless of who he votes for and that alone should be the determining factor (along with any potential criminal activity or harassment) for any sort of action by his employer. I have no beef with what's happening to him in the macro, just a deep concern for an element of how it was discovered who he was.
WickedSmaht is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 04:03 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
He appears to have a 73 type and a current 1C, so I'm guessing he's an airline guy. Hope he's called the union already.
He flew for Hillwood Airways and has already been fired. Some members of Congress on the Armed Services Committee are discussing recalling him to active duty to face charges and he could lose his pension.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 04:13 PM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Some members of Congress on the Armed Services Committee are discussing recalling him to active duty to face charges and he could lose his pension.
They rarely ever do that, but I think it may be possible. Typically not necessary, since they can charge you for anything serious via the civil system, and if it's just minor UCMJ chicken-poop, why bother?

But politics...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 04:34 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
They rarely ever do that, but I think it may be possible. Typically not necessary, since they can charge you for anything serious via the civil system, and if it's just minor UCMJ chicken-poop, why bother?

But politics...
Walking around inside the Capitol building, carrying zip tie cuffs, during an alleged insurgency during which multiple people died isn’t really minor. They could recall him and try him under article 134 for multiple charges, including felony manslaughter. If anything, they could do it to him as a senior officer in order to make an example of him. Civil charges probably wouldn’t result in loss of pension and medical benefits, but a courts-martial could.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 05:11 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Squeakygreaser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Walking around inside the Capitol building, carrying zip tie cuffs, during an alleged insurgency during which multiple people died isn’t really minor. They could recall him and try him under article 134 for multiple charges, including felony manslaughter. If anything, they could do it to him as a senior officer in order to make an example of him. Civil charges probably wouldn’t result in loss of pension and medical benefits, but a courts-martial could.
Yeah, the hand cuffs means attempted sedition. Unless he picked them up as he claimed. Lots of video, they will get to the bottom of that one.
Squeakygreaser is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 05:19 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser View Post
Yeah, the hand cuffs means attempted sedition. Unless he picked them up as he claimed. Lots of video, they will get to the bottom of that one.
I read his interview and I got the impression he is desperately trying to backpedal. Those guys chased off the Capitol police and he now wants us to believe that he was picking up the cuffs to turn them over to the guys they just assaulted and chased away? Riiiight.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 01-09-2021, 06:53 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 470
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
I read his interview and I got the impression he is desperately trying to backpedal. Those guys chased off the Capitol police and he now wants us to believe that he was picking up the cuffs to turn them over to the guys they just assaulted and chased away? Riiiight.
Just like the kid in Charlottesville that literally took of his clothes while saying he wasn’t down with white power. They are all the same when pressed with real consequences.
JurgenKlopp is offline  
Old 01-10-2021, 09:28 AM
  #30  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Walking around inside the Capitol building, carrying zip tie cuffs, during an alleged insurgency during which multiple people died isn’t really minor. They could recall him and try him under article 134 for multiple charges, including felony manslaughter. If anything, they could do it to him as a senior officer in order to make an example of him. Civil charges probably wouldn’t result in loss of pension and medical benefits, but a courts-martial could.
They might do it to just to make the point, but I doubt much of anything will stick unless they have him red-handed on video committing a serious crime. They can't CANX his pension for trespassing. Just because somebody dies in a riot, you don't get to charge ALL of the rioters with murder.

But yes, I suspect he's backpedaling.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
Allegiant
12
02-22-2018 03:36 AM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Bigflya
Allegiant
65
06-22-2013 10:39 AM
vagabond
Hiring News
8
02-07-2009 09:22 PM
vagabond
Allegiant
5
05-21-2008 09:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices