Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Hangar Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/)
-   -   Tool of the day (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/hangar-talk/66729-tool-day.html)

Going2Baja 06-10-2015 09:47 AM

Any LEC Rep that votes Yes for DA's TA today.

Baja.

Vikz09 06-10-2015 09:56 AM


Originally Posted by Going2Baja (Post 1900673)
Any LEC Rep that votes Yes for DA's TA today.

Baja.

+1 I have a serious issue with the non-objective view of this ALPA MEC

John Carr 06-10-2015 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by captjns (Post 1900323)
What is a "Butt munch"?

Watch EVERY episode of Mike Judge's "Beavis and Butthead".

It will give you a better understanding of such fine vernacular and terms to accurately describe certain individuals.

Some other fine terms;

Buttnoid
Fartknocker
Dill hole
Semenefreous tubloidial buttnoid.

SayAlt 06-10-2015 01:26 PM


Originally Posted by MikeF16 (Post 1900331)
To the chic who thought to herself "yeah, I'm sure the next guy to use the toilet will enjoy getting my period blood on his fingers when he lifts the seat". That was awesome.



LAairplaneguy 06-10-2015 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by captjns (Post 1900323)
What is a "Butt munch"?

Nice way off saying ***hole

SayAlt 06-11-2015 05:42 AM

Every single moronic, organ-grinding, lice-eating spider monkey who voted "yes" for the pile of fetid, rotting garbage that is the new DAL TA. DAL mgmt says thank you and look for your blood money under the table at the next meeting.

Herkflyr 06-11-2015 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by SayAlt (Post 1901707)
Every single moronic, organ-grinding, lice-eating spider monkey who voted "yes" for the pile of fetid, rotting garbage that is the new DAL TA. DAL mgmt says thank you and look for your blood money under the table at the next meeting.

I dare you to say that to any of the yes reps faces.

This TA sucks, but these guys do a thankless job for what? So keyboard commandos can post such drivel?

Denny Crane 06-11-2015 07:08 PM


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 1902420)
This TA sucks, but these guys do a thankless job for what? So keyboard commandos can post such drivel?

I would ask everyone of them if they voted yes because that was the input they got from their constituents or did they vote that way because they didn't want to make that decision and decided to turn it over to the pilot group? First option I can live with, the second one is an abdication of responsibility and they deserve to be recalled.

Denny

Sorry for the thread jack. I nominate myself for totd.:o

Denny

SayAlt 06-12-2015 05:11 PM


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 1902420)

the yes reps...

This TA sucks, but these guys do a thankless job

"But" nothing. It's easy to see why they don't get thanked, isn't it?

Just exactly what job did they do, other than allow themselves to be utterly, completely bent-over and gimped by DAL mgmt? I bet they STILL have the ball-gags lashed to their heads!

Record profits, a friggin' $5 BILLION dollar stock buyback program ($5,000,000,000) CLEARLY intended to further enrich the mgmt group (whose compensation comprises of approx. 80% stock and options!), and the yes reps vote to give up concessions, cowardly throwing it to the entire pilot group to vote down instead of sacking up themselves to get the job done??? :eek::eek:

Like I said, any monkey could've done that. It takes exactly zero effort to be someone's personal gimp, like the yes reps clearly are for Richy Rich Anderson & Co. Otherwise, they would have told him to take the TA and shove it up where the sun doesn't shine (unless you are a gimp, of course, as their's get plenty of sunshine).

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lc...0eclo1_500.gif

(that's Richard Anderson with a DAL yes rep, above, picking the next DAL yes rep he is going to bend over for his pleasure)



Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1903473)
This TA converts EASK's to block hours THEN reduces it even further. The result is an instant cure of the old 1.5% loss of those Delta pilot jobs and SPECIFICALLY ALLOWS for an ADDITIONAL (approx) 1% reduction in case management needs it.

But it gets worse. The change from EASK's to block hours ALLOWS the company to drastically down-gauge to smaller (lower paying) aircraft while shifting those extra DELTA PASSENGERS to a JV partner...and be in full compliance with the contract.

Read the language folks. It's all there.

Carl

And Carl didn't even mention the medical BS the mgmt group wanted...and got...in the TA.

Really, if you think this TA is anywhere near fair, you need your head examined for void spaces.

John Carr 06-12-2015 06:37 PM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1902494)
I would ask everyone of them if they voted yes because that was the input they got from their constituents or did they vote that way because they didn't want to make that decision and decided to turn it over to the pilot group? First option I can live with, the second one is an abdication of responsibility and they deserve to be recalled.

I AGREE completely with your statement.

However, had the reps sent it back, there would always be the whiners that take the stance of the following;

"Who is ALPA to tell ME what I should be allowed to vote on!!!??!!!!???!!"

Or

"It B.S. that we didn't get to see it!!!!!!"

I SAY AGAIN, I AGREE WITH YOUR STATEMENT/STANCE. So before a TOTD (NOT you Denny) pipes up, I'm just sayin'.....

But I watched this play out once before in a previous life.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands