4-24-2018 Interviews
06-07-2018 | 08:43 AM
#21
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
06-07-2018 | 08:52 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: B6
06-07-2018 | 09:37 AM
#23
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
AFTER you thoroughly answer the first question (you won't), I wouldn't wiz on your flame-engulfed body after flying a 7-hour trans-con with 4 broken lavs, so I sure as heck wouldn't intentionally be in the same zip code as your wanna-be junior chief pilot rump. Identifying myself to you isn't courageous, it's insanely stupid considering your clear pro-company bias.
Go play in traffic.
06-07-2018 | 09:59 AM
#24
Banned
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
(Did you notice SWA didn't codeshare to HI? That is what real scope looks like.)
I know the rates are an insult. = NO
(SWA usually BEATS the legacies in 737 pay. Right now is an anomaly.)
I know what I am hearing from the NC during the conference call told me that they were tired and beaten and basically caved. = NO
All signs point to our TA being a complete dud.
06-07-2018 | 10:00 AM
#25
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
I wouldn't wiz on your flame-engulfed body after flying a 7-hour trans-con with 4 broken lavs, so I sure as heck wouldn't intentionally be in the same zip code as your wanna-be junior chief pilot rump. Identifying myself to you isn't courageous, it's insanely stupid considering your clear pro-company bias.
Go play in traffic.
Go play in traffic.
06-07-2018 | 10:11 AM
#26
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
In addition, I've asked him repeatedly to AT LEAST defend his pro-company biases. He flat refuses.
I welcome all voices, as we all should, as long as you can support your position with logic, reason and data when available.
That is NOT Hyper.
That's my position, you don't have to agree, but at least I will support my comments.
06-07-2018 | 10:14 AM
#27
Banned
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Reasonable people would agree with you in many circumstances. During a "labor dispute" under the conditions we've experienced I would lean closer to "pick which side you're on until it's resolved" in general, and then with him specifically trying to get me fired, I have no tolerance for him.
In addition, I've asked him repeatedly to AT LEAST defend his pro-company biases. He flat refuses.
I welcome all voices, as we all should, as long as you can support your position with logic, reason and data when available.
That is NOT Hyper.
That's my position, you don't have to agree, but at least I will support my comments.
In addition, I've asked him repeatedly to AT LEAST defend his pro-company biases. He flat refuses.
I welcome all voices, as we all should, as long as you can support your position with logic, reason and data when available.
That is NOT Hyper.
That's my position, you don't have to agree, but at least I will support my comments.
06-07-2018 | 11:06 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Now's your chance, what incredibly amazing and top secret info that can't be obtained in any other way did you learn?
AFTER you thoroughly answer the first question (you won't), I wouldn't wiz on your flame-engulfed body after flying a 7-hour trans-con with 4 broken lavs, so I sure as heck wouldn't intentionally be in the same zip code as your wanna-be junior chief pilot rump. Identifying myself to you isn't courageous, it's insanely stupid considering your clear pro-company bias.
Go play in traffic.
AFTER you thoroughly answer the first question (you won't), I wouldn't wiz on your flame-engulfed body after flying a 7-hour trans-con with 4 broken lavs, so I sure as heck wouldn't intentionally be in the same zip code as your wanna-be junior chief pilot rump. Identifying myself to you isn't courageous, it's insanely stupid considering your clear pro-company bias.
Go play in traffic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
