Search

Notices

Class Drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2019 | 12:21 PM
  #741  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ClncClarence
There are several 2019 hires in LGB right now, however there’s basically zero movement. There were some spots awarded in the August bid but the vacancies left over from that bid resulted in these most recent spots being available to new hires.

Used to be that you’d have a chance to bid out every quarter but now it’s an annual bid so the only guaranteed chance to leave would be via the August 2020 bid with an effective date of January 2021...potentially 16 months from now. Monthly base trades are technically possible however the system bid seemingly wiped out the backlog of folks waiting to get out there.

The folks that just got LGB out of training could possibly be stuck there a while, but impossible to say at this point.
That’s not entirely true, all those spots from the August bid have already been filled, not sure what those extra 4 are for. There’s been a least 12 new FO’s in LGB in the last few months, that’s the definition of movement.
Reply
Old 09-28-2019 | 01:54 PM
  #742  
Layover Master
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 18
From: Seated
Default

Originally Posted by Dashbro
That’s not entirely true, all those spots from the August bid have already been filled, not sure what those extra 4 are for. There’s been a least 12 new FO’s in LGB in the last few months, that’s the definition of movement.
Adding pilots to the bottom of a list is NOT the definition of movement.
Reply
Old 09-28-2019 | 05:58 PM
  #743  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
Adding pilots to the bottom of a list is NOT the definition of movement.
Believe it or not there have been upgrades in LGB as well as people taking upgrades on the east coast. Also, If your relative seniority increases in base then that’s movement in my book.
Reply
Old 09-29-2019 | 03:58 AM
  #744  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
Adding pilots to the bottom of a list is NOT the definition of movement.
Your overall seniority increases. So what is it then? Is your definition of movement retirements? Both are good things.
Reply
Old 09-29-2019 | 06:59 AM
  #745  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dashbro
Believe it or not there have been upgrades in LGB as well as people taking upgrades on the east coast. Also, If your relative seniority increases in base then that’s movement in my book.
No you don’t.
Reply
Old 09-29-2019 | 08:09 AM
  #746  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aldonite7667
No you don’t.
Are all y'all bad at math, or time, or something? Because upgrade for the 190 is right at 3 years, and Airbus upgrade is right behind that.

The seniority list is growing at 10% per year.

In what world does that not produce upward movement?
Reply
Old 09-29-2019 | 01:46 PM
  #747  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
Default

The BlueJet world.

Where the longer you are here the worse your QOL becomes.

For most ...
Reply
Old 09-30-2019 | 05:54 AM
  #748  
Layover Master
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 18
From: Seated
Default

Originally Posted by Dashbro
Believe it or not there have been upgrades in LGB as well as people taking upgrades on the east coast. Also, If your relative seniority increases in base then that’s movement in my book.
Originally Posted by jtrain609
Are all y'all bad at math, or time, or something? Because upgrade for the 190 is right at 3 years, and Airbus upgrade is right behind that.

The seniority list is growing at 10% per year.

In what world does that not produce upward movement?
My point was more that a trickling of new FOs over the course of a year isn't exactly something to celebrate as movement. So instead of bottom reserve guy, you're now a little bit better reserve guy? (This was in response to LGB specifically).

Of course any additional pilots on the bottom end increases relative seniority, and is something to be happy about. However, when you compare it to say, AA or UA, who have not only heavy hiring, also heavy retirements, AND many fleet types in which people change all the time, THAT'S movement. To be the top 20% of the JB 320 list wil will likely take one's entire career, at AA it would take about 10 years.

But I digress, I was being facetious. Point is, there's a lot more movement then just adding 12 guys to the bottom of the list a year.
Reply
Old 09-30-2019 | 06:07 AM
  #749  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
My point was more that a trickling of new FOs over the course of a year isn't exactly something to celebrate as movement. So instead of bottom reserve guy, you're now a little bit better reserve guy? (This was in response to LGB specifically).

Of course any additional pilots on the bottom end increases relative seniority, and is something to be happy about. However, when you compare it to say, AA or UA, who have not only heavy hiring, also heavy retirements, AND many fleet types in which people change all the time, THAT'S movement. To be the top 20% of the JB 320 list wil will likely take one's entire career, at AA it would take about 10 years.

But I digress, I was being facetious. Point is, there's a lot more movement then just adding 12 guys to the bottom of the list a year.
But you can go to the 190 and get top 20% a whole lot faster. At least we have two types about to be three. Unlike a southwest or Alaska (getting rid of their busses) where it is strictly one type only
Reply
Old 09-30-2019 | 06:24 AM
  #750  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
My point was more that a trickling of new FOs over the course of a year isn't exactly something to celebrate as movement. So instead of bottom reserve guy, you're now a little bit better reserve guy? (This was in response to LGB specifically).

Of course any additional pilots on the bottom end increases relative seniority, and is something to be happy about. However, when you compare it to say, AA or UA, who have not only heavy hiring, also heavy retirements, AND many fleet types in which people change all the time, THAT'S movement. To be the top 20% of the JB 320 list wil will likely take one's entire career, at AA it would take about 10 years.

But I digress, I was being facetious. Point is, there's a lot more movement then just adding 12 guys to the bottom of the list a year.
United is hiring around 800 a year on a list of 12,800. That's movement of 6% per year.

JetBlue is hiring 400 per year on a list of 4,000. Easy math is 10%.

Delta didn't run a new hire class for 9 months about 2 years ago because they changed their pairing optimizer language and they ended up being fat on pilots.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
102
08-29-2017 05:12 PM
StandEmUp
Technical
8
06-24-2016 08:41 AM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
30
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices