Search

Notices

Class Drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2023 | 08:08 AM
  #1741  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 10
From: Student of the game
Default

Originally Posted by HastyPack
NK people. Is the DFW base winding down? Or will it remain open?
They just displaced from it but I don't think any base closures are coming before the merger is complete, unless they get the "ok" from Robin.
Reply
Old 02-08-2023 | 10:39 AM
  #1742  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 749
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
Looks like MCO will triple in size, FLL will double.
I see some concessions the govt is going to want to see if they let this through, most prominently in FLL. We will be giving up gates there, I’d bet on that. There is no way the govt is going to let us fortress hub FLL by combining both our sizes as we are.
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 02:58 AM
  #1743  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by avi8orco
I see some concessions the govt is going to want to see if they let this through, most prominently in FLL. We will be giving up gates there, I’d bet on that. There is no way the govt is going to let us fortress hub FLL by combining both our sizes as we are.

which is ridiculous because even the combined % of flights at the FLL “fortress hub” wouldn’t even crack the top 10 fortress hubs in the US.

Honestly I think JB management is perfectly happy taking this to a full trial because they know the governments argument is ridiculous. That way they can keep everything.
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 09:29 AM
  #1744  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by avi8orco
I see some concessions the govt is going to want to see if they let this through, most prominently in FLL. We will be giving up gates there, I’d bet on that. There is no way the govt is going to let us fortress hub FLL by combining both our sizes as we are.
NK+JB in FLL really isn't even a fortress hub. And FLL isn't even the primary airport in south Florida. NK+JB in FLL would be far less concentrated than MIA, ATL, MSP, DTW, SLC, IAH, DFW, DAL, HOU, PHL, DCA, CLT, MDW, EWR...

I really don't see the combined market share as "fortress".
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 10:58 AM
  #1745  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
which is ridiculous because even the combined % of flights at the FLL “fortress hub” wouldn’t even crack the top 10 fortress hubs in the US.

Honestly I think JB management is perfectly happy taking this to a full trial because they know the governments argument is ridiculous. That way they can keep everything.
I know its probably best to play nice for now but is there a way just to go straight to trial? No reasonable person looking at past practice could look at this and say this is more harmful to the general public than Delta/Northwest, Amr/Usair, UAL/CAL or even SWA/airtran. SWA basically taking over the entire MDW airport after ATA was more harmful to competition than this purposed merger. I'm sure the got away with it because they included ORD in the analysis as MIA should be included in the FLL analysis. FLL-MIA is 21 miles apart, ORD-MDW is 16.
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 01:46 PM
  #1746  
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
NK+JB in FLL really isn't even a fortress hub. And FLL isn't even the primary airport in south Florida. NK+JB in FLL would be far less concentrated than MIA, ATL, MSP, DTW, SLC, IAH, DFW, DAL, HOU, PHL, DCA, CLT, MDW, EWR...

I really don't see the combined market share as "fortress".
While the term fortress hub doesn’t really apply, and I disagree with the other guy about the “govt” forcing forfeiture of gates, your assertion of how concentrated both airlines are in FLL is way, way off. I don’t know how you define “concentrated” but Jet Blue could cancel every existing FLL route they run, keep only the current Spirit routes, and FLL would still have more daily flights than about half that list combined with the merged company.

Last edited by RemoveB4flght; 02-09-2023 at 01:47 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 02:18 PM
  #1747  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
While the term fortress hub doesn’t really apply, and I disagree with the other guy about the “govt” forcing forfeiture of gates, your assertion of how concentrated both airlines are in FLL is way, way off. I don’t know how you define “concentrated” but Jet Blue could cancel every existing FLL route they run, keep only the current Spirit routes, and FLL would still have more daily flights than about half that list combined with the merged company.
Isn’t he referring to the concentration of other airlines, not NK+B6 in those bases?
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 03:04 PM
  #1748  
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
Isn’t he referring to the concentration of other airlines, not NK+B6 in those bases?
Maybe, but no other airlines have been mentioned. I don’t even know how “concentrated” is defined as a metric when referring to a specific airport.
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 03:29 PM
  #1749  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
Maybe, but no other airlines have been mentioned. I don’t even know how “concentrated” is defined as a metric when referring to a specific airport.
yea we are talking about all the other legacy fortress hubs.

fll won’t even crack the top 10 fortress hubs in the us.
Reply
Old 02-09-2023 | 09:29 PM
  #1750  
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
yea we are talking about all the other legacy fortress hubs.

fll won’t even crack the top 10 fortress hubs in the us.
The latest DOT joint application filing made a pretty compelling case for how FLL would greatly benefit from the merger. As it is we practically fly formation with each other on a number of routes, as well as compete for the limited international arrival gates at the same times. Combined we could offer both more connections and more international destinations while still freeing up gate space for other carriers. What wasn’t mentioned is spreading out the flights and connections would likely smooth out the high demand on infrastructure (security,customs,baggage handling) during the peak pushes, where as now Terminal 3/4 has two modes, frenzied chaos and post apocalyptic vacant.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
102
08-29-2017 05:12 PM
StandEmUp
Technical
8
06-24-2016 08:41 AM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
30
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices