Search
Notices

Cleaning = Duty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2018, 03:34 AM
  #11  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,887
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Dude View Post
Btw, did you see the name of the original requestor for the legal interpretation? "John Q. de Lancie"? John de Lancie, the actor who played Q on Star Trek?

All right, queue, fess up.
Good catch, but, can't we just say THANK YOU!
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 04:12 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Glad the FAA has our backs. I would have hoped the people to whom I pay 1.9% of my income would be the ones to fight this. What’d they say...bigger fish to fry or something like that? I guess as busy as the FAA is, they probably have bigger fish to fry too. Oh well. At least we have an industry leading....wait. Nevermind.
Well we're the FAA and we're here to help!

it's finally clear... thank god.

The reason it was never a thing for ALPA is because it was never a thing.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 04:20 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
Well we're the FAA and we're here to help!

it's finally clear... thank god.

The reason it was never a thing for ALPA is because it was never a thing.
Yeah, they had their hands full allowing discipline for missed commutes in the "commuter section".
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 05:04 AM
  #14  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,887
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
Well we're the FAA and we're here to help!

it's finally clear... thank god.

The reason it was never a thing for ALPA is because it was never a thing.
I disagree, it is a thing for commuting pilots.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 06:01 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
I disagree, it is a thing for commuting pilots.
We can agree to disagree. I commuted. It was never an issue.

You decide your level of participation. The wording in the guide is vague at best for a reason.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 06:08 AM
  #16  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,887
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
We can agree to disagree. I commuted. It was never an issue.

You decide your level of participation. The wording in the guide is vague at best for a reason.
I don't think it's that vague... The expectation is pretty clear when non-revenue (commuting). Hopefully this FAA interpretation leads to explicit policy changes for pilots.

But what exactly do you mean when you say it wasn't an issue? Do you mean that you didn't clean and were never turned in to Giggity? Or do you mean you cleaned as expected and it wasn't a big deal?
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 06:42 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Dude View Post
Btw, did you see the name of the original requestor for the legal interpretation? "John Q. de Lancie"? John de Lancie, the actor who played Q on Star Trek?

All right, queue, fess up.



This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
queue is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 06:47 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
I don't think it's that vague... The expectation is pretty clear when non-revenue (commuting). Hopefully this FAA interpretation leads to explicit policy changes for pilots.

But what exactly do you mean when you say it wasn't an issue? Do you mean that you didn't clean and were never turned in to Giggity? Or do you mean you cleaned as expected and it wasn't a big deal?
I don't clean. I cross my belt and leave the plane as I found it. I have satisfied the expectation to assist in turning the aircraft for the following flight.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 06:53 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
Yeah, they had their hands full allowing discipline for missed commutes in the "commuter section".
if you choose to commute you also choose to accept the responsibility to show up for your job. If you can't manage to give yourself two flights that were supposed to land one hour before your show time, you're probably doing it wrong.

This is called being an adult. Some may say professional. You're upset because you failed to show up for work and now have to answer for your actions to your supervisor? Is there any job out there anywhere that you don't work for yourself that this is acceptable?

If you can't show up on a regular basis because of your personal choices then I hope you are brought in for a dependability review.

I commuted for over a decade. I can only recall two times I ever had an OOPS and both fell within the confines of the policy. another non-issue.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 07-19-2018, 07:01 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
I don't clean. I cross my belt and leave the plane as I found it. I have satisfied the expectation to assist in turning the aircraft for the following flight.
According to the FAA you performed duty, which at some point made some of the flying you did illegal.

Those who dismiss Queue do so at their peril...
PasserOGas is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
RiddleEagle18
Southwest
302
08-12-2011 07:12 AM
n287hg
Regional
35
10-12-2009 06:40 AM
JethroF15
Cargo
43
12-01-2007 12:22 AM
McAyr
Cargo
21
05-31-2007 07:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices