Cleaning = Duty
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
I'm not trying to pick on you but I do want you to know that there are other sources of authority that BJ could use against you:
- The online training specifically tells you to ask for gloves, clean seat pockets, clean seats, fold belts.
- The CP office sent out an email saying it's not acceptable to only do your row.
- The commuter policy also tells you to clean.
TA 2 needs to have language that permanently and absolutely prohibits pilots from doing ANY non-certificate holder duties at all times. This contract still allows BJ to pass another policy through the coercion of losing your commuting privileges. For example, there is nothing stopping them from saying "clean the toilets" or else you can't get to work, and it you can't get to work, it goes against your Dependability Policy, and we fire you. It's all one big legal trap!
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Spoken like a true apologist and someone who has been defeated in the past. RJ mentality at its finest. That is not what a professional would say.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
if you choose to commute you also choose to accept the responsibility to show up for your job. If you can't manage to give yourself two flights that were supposed to land one hour before your show time, you're probably doing it wrong.
This is called being an adult. Some may say professional. You're upset because you failed to show up for work and now have to answer for your actions to your supervisor? Is there any job out there anywhere that you don't work for yourself that this is acceptable?
If you can't show up on a regular basis because of your personal choices then I hope you are brought in for a dependability review.
I commuted for over a decade. I can only recall two times I ever had an OOPS and both fell within the confines of the policy. another non-issue.
This is called being an adult. Some may say professional. You're upset because you failed to show up for work and now have to answer for your actions to your supervisor? Is there any job out there anywhere that you don't work for yourself that this is acceptable?
If you can't show up on a regular basis because of your personal choices then I hope you are brought in for a dependability review.
I commuted for over a decade. I can only recall two times I ever had an OOPS and both fell within the confines of the policy. another non-issue.
You can have your own opinions of what it means to be an adult. None of what you say changes the FACT of what is written. Only the legal language matters, and it's grossly unfair. Under the existing policy and under the TA, you have no defense whatsoever. Read it. Flowchart it. If a CP has it out for you, they could use the DP against you for a single commute. Does that sound too hyperbolic to you? Well, show me in the language where I am wrong. When you write legal language, it's not based on your impressions or anecdotal experience, it must be based on absolute criteria. The DP and Commuter policy are vague to screw specific people and to keep the rest in line using invisible fences.
The contract needs to say: "You are not liable if: (1) you have on BJ flight, (2) two OAL flights." It doesn't say that in the legalese, regardless of what you feel.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#24
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,887
Your interpretation could lead to discipline or loss of travel privileges if the company doesn't share your interpretation.
It is an issue.
And, as Passer said, you performed required duty but didn't update your duty time with crew services.
It is an issue.
#25
if you choose to commute you also choose to accept the responsibility to show up for your job. If you can't manage to give yourself two flights that were supposed to land one hour before your show time, you're probably doing it wrong.
This is called being an adult. Some may say professional. You're upset because you failed to show up for work and now have to answer for your actions to your supervisor? Is there any job out there anywhere that you don't work for yourself that this is acceptable?
If you can't show up on a regular basis because of your personal choices then I hope you are brought in for a dependability review.
I commuted for over a decade. I can only recall two times I ever had an OOPS and both fell within the confines of the policy. another non-issue.
This is called being an adult. Some may say professional. You're upset because you failed to show up for work and now have to answer for your actions to your supervisor? Is there any job out there anywhere that you don't work for yourself that this is acceptable?
If you can't show up on a regular basis because of your personal choices then I hope you are brought in for a dependability review.
I commuted for over a decade. I can only recall two times I ever had an OOPS and both fell within the confines of the policy. another non-issue.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
I have to disagree. NK commute policy is totally clear, list for 2 flights that arrive before duty, and you can never get in trouble. All of us show up for work on time. That is called being an adult. If you think you need a kindergarten commute policy with threats of dependability reviews because you don’t trust your employees you are no professional.
Meanwhile, TA1 has an escape clause where BJ can determine if you "adequately planned" your commute. If they have their CP kangaroo court deem it inadequately planned, you're in trouble with the Dependability Policy. They could tell us to come in a week earlier to adequately plan for an incoming hurricane, crosswinds out of limits, or even Yellowstone about to blow. There literally is no limit to what they could consider "inadequate planning" under the current TA language. It's not an improvement at all. We need to rewrite TA 1 and get TA 2.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
No, the company is lying like a lawyer is trained to lie. They didn't make a false statement. They made a statement that tricks you into thinking something but it isn't what they said. There are two issues:
- Is commuting "duty"? No... this is what the company said (note: they neglected to mention everything else in the letter).
- Is cleaning while commuting "duty"? Yes... per the FAA.
They are just screwing with you. Who still is voting Yes and foolishly thinking these people are honorable? How many times have they lawyered things to their advantage? The latest email ought to provide all the evidence you need to see why we need a rock solid, legal-proof TA. BJ will not hesitate to lawyer the vagueness of TA 1.0 to their advantage.
I hope ALPA exploits their latest email to demonstrate how dirty these people really are. If *anyone* confronts you about cleaning on your way to work, gather evidence. Keep copies of all the relevant policies as they might change without you knowing it. The law is on your side, follow it. If you don't duty-on at cleaning time (assuming you are commuting to work on BJ), you are breaking the law.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post