Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
United better hurry up.... >

United better hurry up....

Search

Notices

United better hurry up....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2019 | 04:06 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Relative Seniority does not appear in ALPA merger policy.


The 3 tenets (with no particular weight nor order):

Longevity
Career Expectations (which is really narrowbody vs widebody)
Status/Category
Yeah...I corrected myself in a later post. And you're mostly right. ALPA-ALPA has 2 things they look at:

Category/Class
Longevity

Career expectations isn't a stand alone pillar used in ALPA M&A, however it is addressed in the Cat/Class section which takes into consideration, among other things, widebody flying, etc.
Reply
Old 10-29-2019 | 04:14 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: 30 West
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
That’s only two tenets. Status/Category is one. Longevity is another. And career expectations. That’s the ALPA-ALPA policy.
You are right. I forgot about carrier expectations. That would be a hard argument for JB with 3 month 787/777 co-pilots at UAL.
Reply
Old 10-29-2019 | 04:20 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Learjet driver
I don’t think any of those scenarios would work out well for JB especially Delta and United splitting the assets. How would that work?
Well you would need to go back to Pan Am except in this case JetBlue isn’t about to die. Also Delta does not need to buy us to get Bos they are just going to win there they already said so.

If I was to bet I think we tie up with ALK at some point or maybe HA.

Or we seem to be doing fine alone so maybe it keeps going.

Now if for some reason SWA tried to buy us that when I think you would see United or someone start driving up the price.

The really really crazy idea if Spirit was to go after us. They would have a massive FLL hub and be the ulcc uo against 1 major airline in BOS and JFK

Anyway unfortunately or fortunately we sit on some good assets so I think there will always be speculation.
Reply
Old 10-29-2019 | 07:08 AM
  #54  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 48
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
The really really crazy idea if Spirit was to go after us. They would have a massive FLL hub and be the ulcc uo against 1 major airline in BOS and JFK
I think we should go after them (I'll call Robin to let him know ). Out of all the merger partners I think this would emphasize our strengths (FLL) as opposed to trying to add something we dont have. The combined company would be 45% share in FLL, with SWA next at 20%. Thats on our way to fortress hub status particularly considering SWA will have limited international growth from FLL. There is a ton of potential for NK/B6 going southbound.
Reply
Old 10-29-2019 | 08:57 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,501
Likes: 511
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Yeah...I corrected myself in a later post. And you're mostly right. ALPA-ALPA has 2 things they look at:

Category/Class
Longevity

Career expectations isn't a stand alone pillar used in ALPA M&A, however it is addressed in the Cat/Class section which takes into consideration, among other things, widebody flying, etc.

You're wrong, again.

Here's the three tenets straight from the ALPA Merger Policy document:




Here's the full ALPA Merger Policy document:

https://crewroom.alpa.org/ual/Deskto...cumentID=45274



I've been through 2 ALPA-ALPA mergers, both of which resulted in binding arbitration SLIs. Both arbitration final decisions quoted those exact 3 tenets, the 3 pillars of ALPA's merger policy.
Reply
Old 10-30-2019 | 04:12 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 27
Default

Shy.....

You're right. I went back to my training manual I got years ago and there it was.





While the least important of the 3, career expectations will play a roll in asymmetric airlines such as JB and any of the big 3.

Thanks for keeping me honest, and honing my memory kills!
Reply
Old 10-30-2019 | 05:16 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Shy.....

You're right. I went back to my training manual I got years ago and there it was.





While the least important of the 3, career expectations will play a roll in asymmetric airlines such as JB and any of the big 3.

Thanks for keeping me honest, and honing my memory kills!
“Least important” for similar airlines. A little history...

UAL had “career expectations” added after a failed America West merger, just before UAL tried to buy USAir. United had over 100 WB airplanes and USAir had 7.

Longevity was added by Brucia from CAL in 2009, since he was worried about the Widebody disparity between CAL and UAL and wanted more of a DOH integration, making him an instant WB Captain, if UAL bought CAL.

UAL isn’t buying anybody, not with 4,000 hires in the next 3 years, unless we buy a fragmented airline.
Reply
Old 10-30-2019 | 05:27 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by O2pilot

UAL isn’t buying anybody, not with 4,000 hires in the next 3 years, unless we buy a fragmented airline.
They're hiring 4000 pilots......until they're not. If they decided they wanted JB, for whatever reason, they could get those 4000 pilots quicker, along with aircraft, and orders, and real estate, etc.

Point is, what they say today can change in an instant.
Reply
Old 10-30-2019 | 06:37 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Default

I mean my career expectations are to be in the top 100 for the last 10-15 years of my career. So I don’t mind not merging. Just don’t want giggity running the show
Reply
Old 10-30-2019 | 09:19 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 53
Default United better hurry up....

I’m with Saintnick here.

My career expectations currently are to retire in the top 5 of a narrow body and top 10% of our list for a decade.

Should we actually start flying Europe it’s flying 321LR type(read 757 size) aircraft to Europe in the top 5.

I’m not sure where the #5 narrowbody pilot is at United but I would venture to guess it’s actually not very senior. With the number of wide bodies they have narrow body goes pretty junior.

With all that said if we merge with United within a few years I guarantee I wouldn’t be driving to work anymore and that alone is worth not merging for me. I want no part of ANY merger. Just continued steady growth here please. Not sure how realistic that is, but that is my preference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices