Quote:
Why are you so dogmatically opposed to a system you obviously don’t understand?
I am 100% for the improvements to the reserve grid system. I will go to the hill alongside you and fight that battle, for the benefit of all 9,000+ JB/NK pilots. And with this management, it will be a battle like you aren't yet prepared for.Originally Posted by Excargodog
I probably could have gotten away with only dropping three of my initial four scheduled trips, but the fourth one wan’t commutable on either end meaning it would have occupied eight days on the schedule. I dropped it to pick up a higher time and more commutable trip. It wasn’t like I had my base of choice out of training. By the time I was out of IOE all hiring had stopped and you were destined for going to a junior base for eight-nine months until hiring resumed. Now you tell me:Why are you so dogmatically opposed to a system you obviously don’t understand?
But, I want the benefits of that beautiful new reserve grid to be distributed as equitably as possible, as we will all be using some/much of our negotiating capital to achieve it.
Where as JB's current reserve grid is mostly black, with a few green days, by 1 or 2 reserves, I'm hoping the new rules will create a grid that is green by say 10 reserves, as an example, on many days. Those extra 10 reserves per day can be used by a large proportion of the group to drop/swap 1-2 trips, or they can be used by a much smaller proportion of the group if in seniority order the top is allowed to drop ALL their trips.
If the top 15 guys drop all their trips, no more net reserves. If there are more industry standard guardrails (or even industry leading, say DT40-50), then the top 60+ guys get to drop/swap a trip. The benefits would be distributed much more widely, for a benefit we ALL paid for. I also think it prevent more "gaming the system", where the reserve grid would be utilized more for QOL improvement, or at a minimum more widely dispersed premium, vs allowing the top guys to concentrate the benefit into premium for themselves.
I want guardrails and widely dispersed benefit, to be enjoyed by most of the group, in return for the negotiating capital we will all use to achieve it.
I understand guys wanting to remake their awarded line, sometimes. But frankly that can almost always be done using the "swap" function, especially with a modest yet still industry leading DT40-50. I want the best of JB, DL, UAL, SWA and even the best of NK, but that doesn't mean we can't take the best of what NK currently has and tweak it slightly to make the benefits more widely equitable, while still keeping most of what makes it great.