TA Reached
#601
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 53
At some point we have to acknowledge we are negotiating with JB management too.
what will they be willing to negotiate off of. A contract they are familiar with or a completely new system.
how much leverage do we have to make major changes? I contended we do have a good bit of leverage, but where will it be spent?
what will they be willing to negotiate off of. A contract they are familiar with or a completely new system.
how much leverage do we have to make major changes? I contended we do have a good bit of leverage, but where will it be spent?
#602
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 10
From: Student of the game
At some point we have to acknowledge we are negotiating with JB management too.
what will they be willing to negotiate off of. A contract they are familiar with or a completely new system.
how much leverage do we have to make major changes? I contended we do have a good bit of leverage, but where will it be spent?
what will they be willing to negotiate off of. A contract they are familiar with or a completely new system.
how much leverage do we have to make major changes? I contended we do have a good bit of leverage, but where will it be spent?
#603
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
The issue is the cost of the initial green grid, NOT whether the potential drop is to 50 or 25 or 0. If three quarters of the grid must start green, that’s the major cost, not the coverage for the few pilots each cycle that would actually drop all the way to zero. MOST of the drops are in fact trades, and revenue neutral to the company. And even what little incremental cost there is is far from linear.
The drop to xx, even if it is 50, is by far the most costly part. The drop from 50 to 25 requires only a little more, and the drop from 25 to zero is damn near negligible, because the frequency of the drops decreases as zero is approached - it has to, since you can’t drop to 25 WITHOUT dropping to 50.
It’s non linear in cost (be it management dollars or negotiating capital).
Find an industrial engineer or someone with queuing theory training or experience to explain it to you.
The drop to xx, even if it is 50, is by far the most costly part. The drop from 50 to 25 requires only a little more, and the drop from 25 to zero is damn near negligible, because the frequency of the drops decreases as zero is approached - it has to, since you can’t drop to 25 WITHOUT dropping to 50.
It’s non linear in cost (be it management dollars or negotiating capital).
Find an industrial engineer or someone with queuing theory training or experience to explain it to you.
The big cost is in fact the Green Grid rules, as you say. The cost of that is born by the company and the pilots (used up negotiating capital). But the cost is WORTH the investment. But, why let the bulk of the benefit of the Green Grid rules go potentially to the top 5-10-15 guys in each seat that get first crack at the reserve grid via the seniority based windows that open up first? As you say, it's "only a few pilots" who chose to actually drop to ZERO. So why is the Drop to ZERO needed? If we are gonna invest a large part of our negotiating capital, as we SHOULD, into the Green Grid rules, let's also make sure most of the group can benefit that great grid by having a limit on how much any one pilot can drop, just like EVERY OTHER AIRLINE IN THE COUNTRY. DT40-50 is still industry leading, and allows a much larger proportion of the pilot group to utilize that nice new expensive Green Grid...
It's crazy how some of you don't see this, or have any balanced view of this provision.
Why spend all that negotiating capital on a Green Grid and allow the top 5-10-15 to potentially take the grid back to Red before the rest of the group gets a chance? Stupid.
#604
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
By that logic, the more pilots want anything the more the company ought to resist it. That’s nonsense. There are real costs and real marginal costs between proposals. And the cost is in the contractual obligation to keep most of the grid green initially before any drops whatsoever occur. , not with how many swaps occur before the grid days go from green to red.
But you are entitled to your opinion and your vote, just like me. Of course the NK pilots - at least the lineholders - have actual experience with DTZ, and know it’s costs and value. And the cost is in the contractual obligation to keep most of the grid green initially.
It seems like the JB guys are very unhappy with your grid and the NK guys are pretty happy with theirs. Maybe you ought to consider listening to those with a FAVORABLE experience with their grid rules and try THEIR solution rather than concede it out of hand before we really know if there will even be a JCBA.
But you are entitled to your opinion and your vote, just like me. Of course the NK pilots - at least the lineholders - have actual experience with DTZ, and know it’s costs and value. And the cost is in the contractual obligation to keep most of the grid green initially.
It seems like the JB guys are very unhappy with your grid and the NK guys are pretty happy with theirs. Maybe you ought to consider listening to those with a FAVORABLE experience with their grid rules and try THEIR solution rather than concede it out of hand before we really know if there will even be a JCBA.
#605
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
Sure but it's going to be a "new" company at the merger. The "old" Jet Blue wasn't able to cut it and grow as management wanted. The JCBA will be the start of something brand new and it's best to treat it that way and not tie any of our work rules to what wasn't working for the pilot group. You're bringing together two pilot groups with two very different CBAs. You take take the best of each and go from there.
Quick question-
Would you like to build off the TA’d B6 payrates, NKs TAd payrates? Or start from scratch as a “new” airline?
We BUILD off the best of what we have!
Last edited by Desdi; 01-03-2023 at 06:07 AM.
#606
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Correction: JetBlue wasn’t able to grow as FAST as management wanted. It has always been stated the acquisition just accelerates B6s growth plans by 5-7 years, but the overall plan remains little changed. Let’s be clear, B6 is consuming NK, spitting out what it doesn’t like. We should aim to do the same with the JCBA and build off what we have, it will not be a blank slate, something brand new. it better not be! And no it will not be a “new” airline…. It will be JetBlue for better or for worse with the best parts Spirit brings to the table.
Quick question-
Would you like to build off the TA’d B6 payrates, NKs TAd payrates? Or start from scratch as a “new” airline?
We BUILD off the best of what we have!
Quick question-
Would you like to build off the TA’d B6 payrates, NKs TAd payrates? Or start from scratch as a “new” airline?
We BUILD off the best of what we have!
You’re correct. This isn’t the spirit frontier deal. It’s not a merger. It’s an acquisition. It won’t be a new airline. It’ll be a bigger more capable JetBlue.
#607
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 10
From: Student of the game
Correction: JetBlue wasn’t able to grow as FAST as management wanted. It has always been stated the acquisition just accelerates B6s growth plans by 5-7 years, but the overall plan remains little changed. Let’s be clear, B6 is consuming NK, spitting out what it doesn’t like. We should aim to do the same with the JCBA and build off what we have, it will not be a blank slate, something brand new. it better not be! And no it will not be a “new” airline…. It will be JetBlue for better or for worse with the best parts Spirit brings to the table.
Quick question-
Would you like to build off the TA’d B6 payrates, NKs TAd payrates? Or start from scratch as a “new” airline?
We BUILD of he best of what we have!
Quick question-
Would you like to build off the TA’d B6 payrates, NKs TAd payrates? Or start from scratch as a “new” airline?
We BUILD of he best of what we have!
The JCBA should bring the best of both CBAs. I keep reading JB pilots opinions on DTZ and reserve grids and they are all negative because y’all have **** rules. Hence why Spirits grid and DTZ should be where we start with those. And obviously JB pay rates…
#608
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
Obviously it’ll be Jet Blue going forward but hopefully be operating completely different than it was before. Unless you’d like to remain a niche NE airline with ****ty work rules..
The JCBA should bring the best of both CBAs. I keep reading JB pilots opinions on DTZ and reserve grids and they are all negative because y’all have **** rules. Hence why Spirits grid and DTZ should be where we start with those. And obviously JB pay rates…
The JCBA should bring the best of both CBAs. I keep reading JB pilots opinions on DTZ and reserve grids and they are all negative because y’all have **** rules. Hence why Spirits grid and DTZ should be where we start with those. And obviously JB pay rates…
Last edited by Desdi; 01-03-2023 at 07:03 AM.
#609
JB pilots have an unfavorable opinion of the RESERVE GRID. That is separate entirely from DTZ. The Green Grid rules would save 95% of the "denied" drops/swaps JB pilots experience. DTZ would ultimately harm the utility of an improved Green Grid by allowing the top 5-10-15 guys in each seat to take the grid back to Red via the seniority windows before the rest of the group even gets a chance to drop anything.
I have actually only dropped completely to zero one (1) time and it wasn’t as a “top 5-10-15” guy
I was in one of the last few classes to go through training prior to hiring stopping for COVID. There was little flying going on and my class and several others waited months for IOE. After that, we were given a line for one month to try to get as much flying in as possible towards consolidation. It wouldn’t have been enough, so I dropped the entire schedule to rebuild a new one from leftover scraps and other peoples dropped trips to get me consolidated because as one of the junior guys not just at NK but in the majors, I sat a lot of reserve and sure didn’t fly many hours for the next 6 months. I did get consolidated in that one month though. Picking up trips at three different bases to do it.
So no, it ain’t just for the top “5-10-15” most senior pilots. You shouldn’t try to talk authoritatively about something you clearly don’t understand.
#610
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
A lot of ignorance here masquerading as wisdom.
I have actually only dropped completely to zero one (1) time and it wasn’t as a “top 5-10-15” guy
I was in one of the last few classes to go through training prior to hiring stopping for COVID. There was little flying going on and my class and several others waited months for IOE. After that, we were given a line for one month to try to get as much flying in as possible towards consolidation. It wouldn’t have been enough, so I dropped the entire schedule to rebuild a new one from leftover scraps and other peoples dropped trips to get me consolidated because as one of the junior guys not just at NK but in the majors, I sat a lot of reserve and sure didn’t fly many hours for the next 6 months. I did get consolidated in that one month though. Picking up trips at three different bases to do it.
So no, it ain’t just for the top “5-10-15” most senior pilots. You shouldn’t try to talk authoritatively about something you clearly don’t understand.
I have actually only dropped completely to zero one (1) time and it wasn’t as a “top 5-10-15” guy
I was in one of the last few classes to go through training prior to hiring stopping for COVID. There was little flying going on and my class and several others waited months for IOE. After that, we were given a line for one month to try to get as much flying in as possible towards consolidation. It wouldn’t have been enough, so I dropped the entire schedule to rebuild a new one from leftover scraps and other peoples dropped trips to get me consolidated because as one of the junior guys not just at NK but in the majors, I sat a lot of reserve and sure didn’t fly many hours for the next 6 months. I did get consolidated in that one month though. Picking up trips at three different bases to do it.
So no, it ain’t just for the top “5-10-15” most senior pilots. You shouldn’t try to talk authoritatively about something you clearly don’t understand.
It's odd that you had to drop EVERYTHING to zero before rebuilding. Does you FLICA not have a "swap" function?
It's also odd how in most posts you say almost no one uses the FULL ZERO part of DTZ, yet somehow ZERO is critical, can't even be DT10, or DT15, must be ZERO, even though almost no one does that, according to you. And you can't acknowledge that having some kind of limit on the DTZ would push the green grid further down the seniority list for people in the middle or bottom to use before the grids finally go red during the seniority windows? Even other Spirit pilots acknowledge that the more junior guys have "to watch the grid" for when someone else picks up a trip, so they can drop something. That's an acknowledgement that the grids do go red. So instead of allowing the top guys to drop EVERYTHING, without limits, during the opening of the seniority windows, which turns that expensive new Green Grid to Red before it gets further down the list, why not have some limits, at least during the seniority windows, so that more of the group can benefit from that new Green Grid that WE ALL WILL PAY FOR with negotiating capital???
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



