TA Reached
#721
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Do the math and then educate me on what I’m leaving on the table. What % PS are you going to negotiate and for how long? If the company even budges on that. Just to start negotiating again one year from now. Like I said, don’t think for a second that this company won’t tell us to pound sand, pull the offer, and go lean until the JCBA. That is absolutely a possibility. Then what? You sure showed them didn’t you. Or, who knows, maybe we get a little more out of this. But when? There’s a point where we start leaving money on the table. My opinion is just that, an opinion based on all the information I’ve gathered. I suggest you guys do the same and vote accordingly.
So our union leaders won't educate even when they know our pilots don't know the value of it. But no worries, they'll keep telling us the poll data on PS is low.
The bare minimum they could've emailed out pertaining to PS was to tell our own story of Profit Sharing. Give figures on what everyone got BEFORE the CLIFF was added. Maybe even going forward (2023), send an email every year of what we would get each year with our formula WITHOUT a cliff. After all that, tell me where PS would be on the polling data come negotiation time.
#722
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Oh and talking about time value of money, you wouldn't know what was on the table if the union didn't agree to the TA last year. We would be plugging along in a labor dispute. In that case, what would you be calculating?
#723
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
#724
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
The internet has an unfortunate habit of causing people to demonize or denigrate people that simply hold a different opinion than others - and not even of some life or death issue, but simply what MIGHT or MIGHT NOT happen in a negotiation. That is scarcely the way to build union unity (note the similar etymology of those words?) for effective future negotiations with management.
surely you can advocate for your side of an issue without calling your fellows cowards, rat b@stards, etc? Can’t you?
surely you can advocate for your side of an issue without calling your fellows cowards, rat b@stards, etc? Can’t you?
#725
Cowardly it is to vote in such a way which retards the industry. I don’t relish the thought of hitching my wagon to another 2000 (~2/3 of the pilot group at spirit that voted yes) lemmings. I had greater hope for the spirit guys and am disappointed. We already have plenty uninformed lemmings here. Outside of that vote perhaps none of these labels apply, but in regards to your vote they do.
#726
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Hard to quantify. The best we can do is make an educated guess. I never called you misinformed. If PS is the hill you wanna die on at this very moment, I can respect that. We’d need to take into account what sending this back would do to our timeline. In other words, money we’ve left on the table while we negotiate for more…versus what gains we could make from that negotiating period. Meanwhile they will keep filling 20-30 person classes with fresh ATP’s. If you think they can’t do that, you’re mistaken. Maybe you have reps resign? Maybe the company decides, you know what, it’s summer, we can just roll with what we’ve got until spring. These are all real possibilities. But let’s say we get PS. Will that equate to what we’ve left on the table while negotiating? From a company that is barely turning out a profit, who’s stock was just downgraded a few weeks ago? We all have to make the most informed decision we can. I’m comfortable with my stance and taking this into the JCBA.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
That's how much PS is valuable.
#727
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Hard to quantify. The best we can do is make an educated guess. I never called you misinformed. If PS is the hill you wanna die on at this very moment, I can respect that. We’d need to take into account what sending this back would do to our timeline. In other words, money we’ve left on the table while we negotiate for more…versus what gains we could make from that negotiating period. Meanwhile they will keep filling 20-30 person classes with fresh ATP’s. If you think they can’t do that, you’re mistaken. Maybe you have reps resign? Maybe the company decides, you know what, it’s summer, we can just roll with what we’ve got until spring. These are all real possibilities. But let’s say we get PS. Will that equate to what we’ve left on the table while negotiating? From a company that is barely turning out a profit, who’s stock was just downgraded a few weeks ago? We all have to make the most informed decision we can. I’m comfortable with my stance and taking this into the JCBA.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
Respectfully if they can fill the classes why in the world would they agree to this? Is the company just doing us a favour (Robbin H spelling)
You kind of just argued against yourself.
#728
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Even for a company barely making profit in January 2022, if we had gotten PS now, we would still make up for what's left on the table, due to time in bargaining, and then some within 5 yrs vs not having it for atleast the next 5 to 10 years (Yes I do believe we still won't get PS in JCBA even though I will still vote no if its not in there)
That's how much PS is valuable.
That's how much PS is valuable.
valueable enough for the company to REFUSE to give it to us.
#730
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
see the company won’t refuse next time. The refused last time they refused this time but next time well.
I honestly don’t think we will get it in the JCBA. That thing will be a mess and the spirit guys (no offense) look like they will sell their kids to save drop to zero. We want better healthcare no in base layovers and such. PS will be low on the list again. And if we don’t get it there we will never have it, especially with the current management philosophy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



