Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2023 | 11:53 AM
  #721  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Do the math and then educate me on what I’m leaving on the table. What % PS are you going to negotiate and for how long? If the company even budges on that. Just to start negotiating again one year from now. Like I said, don’t think for a second that this company won’t tell us to pound sand, pull the offer, and go lean until the JCBA. That is absolutely a possibility. Then what? You sure showed them didn’t you. Or, who knows, maybe we get a little more out of this. But when? There’s a point where we start leaving money on the table. My opinion is just that, an opinion based on all the information I’ve gathered. I suggest you guys do the same and vote accordingly.
You are leaving higher hourly rate and PS on the table. You would more than make up for the money lost even while negotiating a JCBA in 2024, 2025 and 2026. I called reps, I went to the roadshow. Don't just assume that because I'm here disagreeing with your stance, means I'm not informed. 1 rep told me that if they were to create PS comparison table, they would have to be telling stories as to why and having to explain everything. I mean, how else will you educate everyone? Meanwhile another said "The polls on PS are low because most of these pilots coming in are from regional/charter that don't have PS so they don't know the value of it"

So our union leaders won't educate even when they know our pilots don't know the value of it. But no worries, they'll keep telling us the poll data on PS is low.

The bare minimum they could've emailed out pertaining to PS was to tell our own story of Profit Sharing. Give figures on what everyone got BEFORE the CLIFF was added. Maybe even going forward (2023), send an email every year of what we would get each year with our formula WITHOUT a cliff. After all that, tell me where PS would be on the polling data come negotiation time.
Reply
Old 01-13-2023 | 11:57 AM
  #722  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Default

Oh and talking about time value of money, you wouldn't know what was on the table if the union didn't agree to the TA last year. We would be plugging along in a labor dispute. In that case, what would you be calculating?
Reply
Old 01-13-2023 | 02:02 PM
  #723  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Bgood
Oh and talking about time value of money, you wouldn't know what was on the table if the union didn't agree to the TA last year. We would be plugging along in a labor dispute. In that case, what would you be calculating?
Hard to quantify. The best we can do is make an educated guess. I never called you misinformed. If PS is the hill you wanna die on at this very moment, I can respect that. We’d need to take into account what sending this back would do to our timeline. In other words, money we’ve left on the table while we negotiate for more…versus what gains we could make from that negotiating period. Meanwhile they will keep filling 20-30 person classes with fresh ATP’s. If you think they can’t do that, you’re mistaken. Maybe you have reps resign? Maybe the company decides, you know what, it’s summer, we can just roll with what we’ve got until spring. These are all real possibilities. But let’s say we get PS. Will that equate to what we’ve left on the table while negotiating? From a company that is barely turning out a profit, who’s stock was just downgraded a few weeks ago? We all have to make the most informed decision we can. I’m comfortable with my stance and taking this into the JCBA.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
Reply
Old 01-13-2023 | 03:37 PM
  #724  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
The internet has an unfortunate habit of causing people to demonize or denigrate people that simply hold a different opinion than others - and not even of some life or death issue, but simply what MIGHT or MIGHT NOT happen in a negotiation. That is scarcely the way to build union unity (note the similar etymology of those words?) for effective future negotiations with management.
surely you can advocate for your side of an issue without calling your fellows cowards, rat b@stards, etc? Can’t you?
Cowardly it is to vote in such a way which retards the industry. I don’t relish the thought of hitching my wagon to another 2000 (~2/3 of the pilot group at spirit that voted yes) lemmings. I had greater hope for the spirit guys and am disappointed. We already have plenty uninformed lemmings here. Outside of that vote perhaps none of these labels apply, but in regards to your vote they do.
Reply
Old 01-13-2023 | 04:44 PM
  #725  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by Just
Cowardly it is to vote in such a way which retards the industry. I don’t relish the thought of hitching my wagon to another 2000 (~2/3 of the pilot group at spirit that voted yes) lemmings. I had greater hope for the spirit guys and am disappointed. We already have plenty uninformed lemmings here. Outside of that vote perhaps none of these labels apply, but in regards to your vote they do.
You are entitled to your opinion - just as those who voted for the TA are entitled to theirs. That does not make you reckless, greedy, or hateful, nor does it make them cowards. Their values are different than yours in a relatively minor issue.
Reply
Old 01-14-2023 | 01:43 PM
  #726  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Hard to quantify. The best we can do is make an educated guess. I never called you misinformed. If PS is the hill you wanna die on at this very moment, I can respect that. We’d need to take into account what sending this back would do to our timeline. In other words, money we’ve left on the table while we negotiate for more…versus what gains we could make from that negotiating period. Meanwhile they will keep filling 20-30 person classes with fresh ATP’s. If you think they can’t do that, you’re mistaken. Maybe you have reps resign? Maybe the company decides, you know what, it’s summer, we can just roll with what we’ve got until spring. These are all real possibilities. But let’s say we get PS. Will that equate to what we’ve left on the table while negotiating? From a company that is barely turning out a profit, who’s stock was just downgraded a few weeks ago? We all have to make the most informed decision we can. I’m comfortable with my stance and taking this into the JCBA.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.
Even for a company barely making profit in January 2022, if we had gotten PS now, we would still make up for what's left on the table, due to time in bargaining, and then some within 5 yrs vs not having it for atleast the next 5 to 10 years (Yes I do believe we still won't get PS in JCBA even though I will still vote no if its not in there)

That's how much PS is valuable.
Reply
Old 01-14-2023 | 03:10 PM
  #727  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Hard to quantify. The best we can do is make an educated guess. I never called you misinformed. If PS is the hill you wanna die on at this very moment, I can respect that. We’d need to take into account what sending this back would do to our timeline. In other words, money we’ve left on the table while we negotiate for more…versus what gains we could make from that negotiating period. Meanwhile they will keep filling 20-30 person classes with fresh ATP’s. If you think they can’t do that, you’re mistaken. Maybe you have reps resign? Maybe the company decides, you know what, it’s summer, we can just roll with what we’ve got until spring. These are all real possibilities. But let’s say we get PS. Will that equate to what we’ve left on the table while negotiating? From a company that is barely turning out a profit, who’s stock was just downgraded a few weeks ago? We all have to make the most informed decision we can. I’m comfortable with my stance and taking this into the JCBA.
One other point you alluded to that is 100% accurate: this pilot group does not understand or value the monetary value of profit sharing…that falls solely on our MEC.

Respectfully if they can fill the classes why in the world would they agree to this? Is the company just doing us a favour (Robbin H spelling)

You kind of just argued against yourself.
Reply
Old 01-14-2023 | 03:14 PM
  #728  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Bgood
Even for a company barely making profit in January 2022, if we had gotten PS now, we would still make up for what's left on the table, due to time in bargaining, and then some within 5 yrs vs not having it for atleast the next 5 to 10 years (Yes I do believe we still won't get PS in JCBA even though I will still vote no if its not in there)

That's how much PS is valuable.

valueable enough for the company to REFUSE to give it to us.
Reply
Old 01-14-2023 | 05:14 PM
  #729  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default

And yet Delta is about to pay out 2 months worth of salary in profit sharing to its pilots. Tell me again how “we’ll get ‘em next time” will help us by “not leaving money on the table now”?
Reply
Old 01-14-2023 | 05:29 PM
  #730  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by BernieM86
And yet Delta is about to pay out 2 months worth of salary in profit sharing to its pilots. Tell me again how “we’ll get ‘em next time” will help us by “not leaving money on the table now”?

see the company won’t refuse next time. The refused last time they refused this time but next time well.

I honestly don’t think we will get it in the JCBA. That thing will be a mess and the spirit guys (no offense) look like they will sell their kids to save drop to zero. We want better healthcare no in base layovers and such. PS will be low on the list again. And if we don’t get it there we will never have it, especially with the current management philosophy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
1
01-21-2009 11:00 AM
Sir James
Major
1
08-23-2007 01:59 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices