Search
Notices

Pairing survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2023, 05:47 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default Pairing survey

Joint company and ALPA pairing survey.

Go do it. The pairings are awful.

You would think the 6 month backlog of fatigue call reviews would be enough of a wake up call for the company but apparently they need us to spell it out for them.

Last edited by RiddleEagle18; 05-17-2023 at 05:58 PM.
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 04:58 AM
  #2  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18 View Post
Joint company and ALPA pairing survey.

Go do it. The pairings are awful.

You would think the 6 month backlog of fatigue call reviews would be enough of a wake up call for the company but apparently they need us to spell it out for them.
Done. Hope this means they will do something. Glad it's being considered on a base to base basis, different bases definitely want different things.

And yes, agree, the pairings are atrocious.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 06:06 AM
  #3  
Some Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Done. Hope this means they will do something. Glad it's being considered on a base to base basis, different bases definitely want different things.

And yes, agree, the pairings are atrocious.
Done as well. I'm hoping people actually do this survey and something positive comes from it.
RJDriver900 is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 07:05 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Done. Hope this means they will do something. Glad it's being considered on a base to base basis, different bases definitely want different things.

And yes, agree, the pairings are atrocious.

I agree. Each base needs and wants different things.

mco is a 95% local base. FLL 90+. I don’t want 4-5 days. I want productivity over commutability. I want to stop flipping circadian rhythms.
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 07:16 AM
  #5  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18 View Post
I agree. Each base needs and wants different things.

mco is a 95% local base. FLL 90+. I don’t want 4-5 days. I want productivity over commutability. I want to stop flipping circadian rhythms.
This is a wild idea, but I'd love to see a virtual domicile just for commuters where they could only bid commutable 4-5day trips, but could bid from any base. One week you do a BOS 4 day, then a JFK 4 day the week after, etc.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 07:29 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
This is a wild idea, but I'd love to see a virtual domicile just for commuters where they could only bid commutable 4-5day trips, but could bid from any base. One week you do a BOS 4 day, then a JFK 4 day the week after, etc.
What prevents the junior guy who lives in central PA and drives 3 hrs to NY from getting a 4 day trip in LAX?
PSU Flyer is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 07:35 AM
  #7  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by PSU Flyer View Post
What prevents the junior guy who lives in central PA and drives 3 hrs to NY from getting a 4 day trip in LAX?
It would be a small voluntary opt-in bid. If you were junior and unable to hold all JFK 4 day trips then you wouldn't bid into the virtual domicile.

Once you had enough seniority you could bid in and get both JFK and EWR 4day trips if you wanted.

It isn't a perfect system at all, but considering the vast majority of our 4-5day trip desires are from those who commute by plane then maybe it would be something to consider. It would relieve the company from base pairing distribution parameters, which should drive more productive 1-2-3 day trips as well as more commutable 4-5day trips. It would give pilots who commute by plane more options for bidding and trading trips.

We group pilots who live near BOS into one bid status, same with every other base, but for those who are not geographically tied to a single base we still force them to chose one airport when in fact there could be multiple airports they are able to commute to without much difference.

Last edited by Flyby1206; 05-18-2023 at 07:58 AM.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 09:57 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,011
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
It would be a small voluntary opt-in bid. If you were junior and unable to hold all JFK 4 day trips then you wouldn't bid into the virtual domicile.

Once you had enough seniority you could bid in and get both JFK and EWR 4day trips if you wanted.

It isn't a perfect system at all, but considering the vast majority of our 4-5day trip desires are from those who commute by plane then maybe it would be something to consider. It would relieve the company from base pairing distribution parameters, which should drive more productive 1-2-3 day trips as well as more commutable 4-5day trips. It would give pilots who commute by plane more options for bidding and trading trips.

We group pilots who live near BOS into one bid status, same with every other base, but for those who are not geographically tied to a single base we still force them to chose one airport when in fact there could be multiple airports they are able to commute to without much difference.
Big fan of this idea.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 10:11 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
This is a wild idea, but I'd love to see a virtual domicile just for commuters where they could only bid commutable 4-5day trips, but could bid from any base. One week you do a BOS 4 day, then a JFK 4 day the week after, etc.
OAK VB cerca 2008. Disaster
Sludgefund is offline  
Old 05-18-2023, 10:13 AM
  #10  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by Sludgefund View Post
OAK VB cerca 2008. Disaster
That was before my time. Can you expand why it was a disaster and how this would be replicating earlier mistakes?

For the sake of this concept, a pilot would still need to retain a real base for the purposes of vacation, recurrent, etc.

Last edited by Flyby1206; 05-18-2023 at 10:25 AM.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Refing
JetBlue
193
02-15-2023 10:27 AM
SebastianDesoto
Regional
14
03-08-2014 06:06 PM
tmahoney
Part 135
7
02-18-2009 08:32 AM
WatchThis!
Major
1
04-03-2008 12:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices