Can we buy Spirit's Airbus delivery slots ?
#71
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Why would we defer our orders over the next decade and then make a new order? It doesn't make any sense to extend our order book from 2027 to 2033 and then order more on top of that. We already don't want the Jets we have coming, otherwise we wouldn't have played around with our order book.
We had some really big aircraft delivery numbers for the next few years, some years were 30+ deliveries. They smoothed out the numbers so that we take about 22-24 (I think) a year, to help reduce CAPEX while we rebuild the profitability of the company.
The deferrals I saw today took some of our deliveries from 2024-2027 and moved them to 2028. Have you seen anything showing some of them being moved to 2029-2030? It's possible, but I haven't seen it. As far as I know, even with the deferrals, our orders stop around 2028. And with us planning to retire our oldest A320s, even if that retirement has been extended a bit, once they are gone our current order book results in very little net growth from where we are. Some, but not a lot. And that growth would end permanently in or near 2028. So JB MUST place an order now, if they want to continue taking airplanes and growing post 2028. If they wait another year or two, the delivery dates simply get pushed out even further, 2031, 2032+. They CAN'T wait. And, the price just keeps going up. After the Alaska door blew off, now UAL is considering ditching the MAX-10 order for A321NEOs, driving up demand, driving up prices, and pushing out the delivery availability window even further.
If the undisclosed order isn't JB, we are in real trouble. The plan was Spirit, and Spirits order book. That plan doesn't look like it's gonna work, so they had to have an alternative plan to get jets. It was pretty clear before the ruling came out that JB knew it was blocked. Robin's retirement, Joanna saying in her email "Robin's pursuit of the merger" etc. In fact, that one line was the only thing she said about Spirit in her long "I'm the new CEO" email. They had known since the end of the trial it wasn't going their way. Trial ended Dec 5th. December 21-22 this undisclosed order is placed with Airbus. There are only so many companies that fit that fleet mix (A321s+A220-300s), only so many that need this timing, and only so many reasons to keep the order secret. Most airlines are proud to put their name on these high profile orders, unless they have a good reason not to immediately.
On the investor call today, an analyst asked Ursula how we were able to get Airbus to agree to these deferrals without paying a penalty (there are other reasons right now that could work, but her response was interesting), and she quickly snapped back saying "I don't want to talk more about the deferrals, it was mutually beneficial" with Airbus.
Only a select number of people know who this order is really for, we won't know until the press release, but I'm still fairly certain it's ours. Which still leaves a 100% possibility of being wrong. So we wait...
Last edited by Bluedriver; 01-30-2024 at 06:40 PM.
#72
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 536
Likes: 41
If you order a new Airbus today, you are probably looking at the first deliveries in 2029 or even 2030. Airbus has a 6,000 order BACKLOG on the A320/321! A new order placed today goes at the end of the line.
We had some really big aircraft delivery numbers for the next few years, some years were 30+ deliveries. They smoothed out the numbers so that we take about 22-24 (I think) a year, to help reduce CAPEX while we rebuild the profitability of the company.
The deferrals I saw today took some of our deliveries from 2024-2027 and moved them to 2028. Have you seen anything showing some of them being moved to 2029-2030? It's possible, but I haven't seen it. As far as I know, even with the deferrals, our orders stop around 2028. And with us planning to retire our oldest A320s, even if that retirement has been extended a bit, once they are gone our current order book results in very little net growth from where we are. Some, but not a lot. And that growth would end permanently in or near 2028. So JB MUST place an order now, if they want to continue taking airplanes and growing post 2028. If they wait another year or two, the delivery dates simply get pushed out even further, 2031, 2032+. They CAN'T wait. And, the price just keeps going up. After the Alaska door blew off, now UAL is considering ditching the MAX-10 order for A321NEOs, driving up demand, driving up prices, and pushing out the delivery availability window even further.
If the undisclosed order isn't JB, we are in real trouble. The plan was Spirit, and Spirits order book. That plan doesn't look like it's gonna work, so they had to have an alternative plan to get jets. It was pretty clear before the ruling came out that JB knew it was blocked. Robin's retirement, Joanna saying in her email "Robin's pursuit of the merger" etc. In fact, that one line was the only thing she said about Spirit in her long "I'm the new CEO" email. They had known since the end of the trial it wasn't going their way. Trial ended Dec 5th. December 21-22 this undisclosed order is placed with Airbus. There are only so many companies that fit that fleet mix (A321s+A220-300s), only so many that need this timing, and only so many reasons to keep the order secret. Most airlines are proud to put their name on these high profile orders, unless they have a good reason not to immediately.
On the investor call today, an analyst asked Ursula how we were able to get Airbus to agree to these deferrals without paying a penalty (there are other reasons right now that could work, but her response was interesting), and she quickly snapped back saying "I don't want to talk more about the deferrals, it was mutually beneficial" with Airbus.
Only a select number of people know who this order is really for, we won't know until the press release, but I'm still fairly certain it's ours. So we wait...
We had some really big aircraft delivery numbers for the next few years, some years were 30+ deliveries. They smoothed out the numbers so that we take about 22-24 (I think) a year, to help reduce CAPEX while we rebuild the profitability of the company.
The deferrals I saw today took some of our deliveries from 2024-2027 and moved them to 2028. Have you seen anything showing some of them being moved to 2029-2030? It's possible, but I haven't seen it. As far as I know, even with the deferrals, our orders stop around 2028. And with us planning to retire our oldest A320s, even if that retirement has been extended a bit, once they are gone our current order book results in very little net growth from where we are. Some, but not a lot. And that growth would end permanently in or near 2028. So JB MUST place an order now, if they want to continue taking airplanes and growing post 2028. If they wait another year or two, the delivery dates simply get pushed out even further, 2031, 2032+. They CAN'T wait. And, the price just keeps going up. After the Alaska door blew off, now UAL is considering ditching the MAX-10 order for A321NEOs, driving up demand, driving up prices, and pushing out the delivery availability window even further.
If the undisclosed order isn't JB, we are in real trouble. The plan was Spirit, and Spirits order book. That plan doesn't look like it's gonna work, so they had to have an alternative plan to get jets. It was pretty clear before the ruling came out that JB knew it was blocked. Robin's retirement, Joanna saying in her email "Robin's pursuit of the merger" etc. In fact, that one line was the only thing she said about Spirit in her long "I'm the new CEO" email. They had known since the end of the trial it wasn't going their way. Trial ended Dec 5th. December 21-22 this undisclosed order is placed with Airbus. There are only so many companies that fit that fleet mix (A321s+A220-300s), only so many that need this timing, and only so many reasons to keep the order secret. Most airlines are proud to put their name on these high profile orders, unless they have a good reason not to immediately.
On the investor call today, an analyst asked Ursula how we were able to get Airbus to agree to these deferrals without paying a penalty (there are other reasons right now that could work, but her response was interesting), and she quickly snapped back saying "I don't want to talk more about the deferrals, it was mutually beneficial" with Airbus.
Only a select number of people know who this order is really for, we won't know until the press release, but I'm still fairly certain it's ours. So we wait...
#73
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
In other words, if it was that simple, she probably would have just said that.
#74
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 108
Likes: 1
Ok, so that leads to a question... and before every troglodyte comes out of the woodwork to b!tch about how they've been lied to for ten years...yeah, I get it. That was then, this is now.
We are flying to Europe, there's only so many slots/gates to go around. With the aforementioned NB order in mind, at what point does it make sense to upgauge the size of the plane? How far are their other production lines backed up compared to 321s?
We are flying to Europe, there's only so many slots/gates to go around. With the aforementioned NB order in mind, at what point does it make sense to upgauge the size of the plane? How far are their other production lines backed up compared to 321s?
#75
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Ok, so that leads to a question... and before every troglodyte comes out of the woodwork to b!tch about how they've been lied to for ten years...yeah, I get it. That was then, this is now.
We are flying to Europe, there's only so many slots/gates to go around. With the aforementioned NB order in mind, at what point does it make sense to upgauge the size of the plane? How far are their other production lines backed up compared to 321s?
We are flying to Europe, there's only so many slots/gates to go around. With the aforementioned NB order in mind, at what point does it make sense to upgauge the size of the plane? How far are their other production lines backed up compared to 321s?
But I believe the widebody order backlog is much smaller, especially for the A330/A330NEO. But smaller may or may not mean shorter, depending on production rates. But I think the A330/A330NEO is in fact much shorter.
#76
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 108
Likes: 1
Are you asking why no widebodies on the order? Or what are you saying/asking?
But I believe the widebody order backlog is much smaller, especially for the A330/A330NEO. But smaller may or may not mean shorter, depending on production rates. But I think the A330/A330NEO is in fact much shorter.
But I believe the widebody order backlog is much smaller, especially for the A330/A330NEO. But smaller may or may not mean shorter, depending on production rates. But I think the A330/A330NEO is in fact much shorter.
#78
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Yes, I believe they can for a period of time for competitive or other reasons. I've looked it up before and I think they can file to keep it undisclosed for a period of time, and then jump through another hoop for even longer. But it's been a while.
#79
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
I wouldn't expect it to be in the same order because I don't think they are ready for it right now. But you've war gamed this out several years, so I'm asking when you think they would make such an order and when those planes might hit the street based on all of the above guestimations. In other words, we can't fly NBs across the pond forever...
#80
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 38
........
On the investor call today, an analyst asked Ursula how we were able to get Airbus to agree to these deferrals without paying a penalty (there are other reasons right now that could work, but her response was interesting), and she quickly snapped back saying "I don't want to talk more about the deferrals, it was mutually beneficial" with Airbus.
Only a select number of people know who this order is really for, we won't know until the press release, but I'm still fairly certain it's ours. Which still leaves a 100% possibility of being wrong. So we wait...
On the investor call today, an analyst asked Ursula how we were able to get Airbus to agree to these deferrals without paying a penalty (there are other reasons right now that could work, but her response was interesting), and she quickly snapped back saying "I don't want to talk more about the deferrals, it was mutually beneficial" with Airbus.
Only a select number of people know who this order is really for, we won't know until the press release, but I'm still fairly certain it's ours. Which still leaves a 100% possibility of being wrong. So we wait...


