Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
Go to Delta after 7 years? >

Go to Delta after 7 years?

Search

Notices

Go to Delta after 7 years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2025 | 09:55 AM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 406
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer;[url=tel:3925885
3925885[/url]]The thing is though, we aren't special when it comes to IROPs. Yes, ours may be worse because we only have a smaller fleet that is contained mostly within the East Coast/Caribbean, but plenty of other airlines have IROPS and modifications. To pretend they don't is silly. Heck, Southwest's operation basically came to a grinding halt a couple years ago. My buddy on a NB at a legacy complains all the time that his trips go to crap. Reroutes, modifications etc but they also get reroute pay and he gets quite a bit of money from those company errors.

The difference is the security. He's not waking up in the morning wondering if his company is going to exist in the next few years. That's the primary reason I would want to leave. The money? We're not THAT far off from the legacies, and an extra $20k-$30k/yr isn't going to be life changing at our income level. Knowing I work for a strong company with a secure future is the difference between us and them. When I was hired here, the company had a very promising future. Now it feels like any news we get is consistently negative which absolutely kills morale. DL/UA/AA are all too big to fail now IMO. We are not.
someone asked why should a new hire stay at JetBlue in a pocket session. They didn’t really have an answer other than we’d look better 5 years from now after we get past all these hurdles. But that’s assuming jet forward works but then what do we look like? Alaska on the east coast? So unless you’re senior and live in NY or BOS, why do you stay here? Long upgrades, degraded trips, low QoL. It’s still a gamble. We’re a failing startup that has to convince VCs to continue to invest so that one day we make a profit (drawing an analogy). Right now, from a financial standpoint and from those that have invested A LOT, the best bet for them is for us to get bought at $10-12/share. But the question is who buys us?
At this point getting to that price or even higher into the $20 requires us to make a profit and we’re not even estimated to break even until FY2027. That’s not even profit…. But I get it, we’re trying to do that. But even if we make money we still have a lot of debt and management likes to say we have cash but it’s borrowed cash. At 9.875% interest. So when we’re surviving on loans and the 30Y continuing to climb which makes our debt less attractive, it means we either gotta start printing money fast or we’re just going to keep getting crushed… I don’t think anyone is going to come save us. We can hope but that usually doesn’t work.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 302
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by STIorSTD
someone asked why should a new hire stay at JetBlue in a pocket session. They didn’t really have an answer...
Oh, nobody should come here as a commuting newhire if they have a choice. Even in base I can’t make much of an argument. That said, I disagree it’s that bad here/that much better elsewhere that you *should* be jumping ship. Wanting to leave, totally get it, but “stupid it you stay” is just the worst of the internet, particularly APC.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 11:46 AM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 20
Default

I wasn't at JB but with Spirit for 10 years, and decided to leave the day the merger didn't work out. I went from commuting with NK to driving to a DL base. It was a though choice at first to give up all those years but I'm happy I had the move. Just like you, I have 20+ years left.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 01:58 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 406
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by MergingTargets;[url=tel:3925911
3925911[/url]]Oh, nobody should come here as a commuting newhire if they have a choice. Even in base I can’t make much of an argument. That said, I disagree it’s that bad here/that much better elsewhere that you *should* be jumping ship. Wanting to leave, totally get it, but “stupid it you stay” is just the worst of the internet, particularly APC.
yeah there’s no reason to come here but if you’re already here it’s a personal choice to leave
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 02:00 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Midwest had like 40 airplanes and a hub in Milwaukee. I know we aren’t great but can we leave the hyperbole for another thread.
It’s not hyperbole when we haven’t turned a profit in over 6 years!! And what does them having 40 airplanes have to do with anything? It means our losses are bigger and we are not too big to fail!
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 03:16 PM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 302
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by gottagetout
It’s not hyperbole when we haven’t turned a profit in over 6 years!! And what does them having 40 airplanes have to do with anything? It means our losses are bigger and we are not too big to fail!
We’re a lot more valuable, though. JFK alone is objectively worth a lot more than a few gates in Milwaukee.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 05:57 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer
The thing is though, we aren't special when it comes to IROPs. Yes, ours may be worse because we only have a smaller fleet that is contained mostly within the East Coast/Caribbean, but plenty of other airlines have IROPS and modifications. To pretend they don't is silly. Heck, Southwest's operation basically came to a grinding halt a couple years ago. My buddy on a NB at a legacy complains all the time that his trips go to crap. Reroutes, modifications etc but they also get reroute pay and he gets quite a bit of money from those company errors.

The difference is the security. He's not waking up in the morning wondering if his company is going to exist in the next few years. That's the primary reason I would want to leave. The money? We're not THAT far off from the legacies, and an extra $20k-$30k/yr isn't going to be life changing at our income level. Knowing I work for a strong company with a secure future is the difference between us and them. When I was hired here, the company had a very promising future. Now it feels like any news we get is consistently negative which absolutely kills morale. DL/UA/AA are all too big to fail now IMO. We are not.
This is true. But an IROP means no money at all because we corned ourselves. Legacies have hubs everywhere to re route or just make money.
Crews stay together. The have multiple flights a day so the can cx 3/4 and get the rest out. Swapping EDCTs. A plane delayed in PHX say will avalanche because we can’t put those pax anywhere unlike legacies that don’t have to wait on inbound
Heck just JFK look at the fuel lost. We’re always burning more fuel than we want. They recovery time for IROPs is way shorter. Our business model is wound so tight and based on things being normal.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 08:41 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 373
Default

Originally Posted by MergingTargets
We’re a lot more valuable, though. JFK alone is objectively worth a lot more than a few gates in Milwaukee.

Jetblue market cap is $1.6B. How much of that $1.6B represents the value of the JFK gates?

Last edited by FriendlyPilot; 07-05-2025 at 08:52 PM.
Reply
Old 07-05-2025 | 08:51 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 373
Default

Originally Posted by N311JB
This is true. But an IROP means no money at all because we corned ourselves. Legacies have hubs everywhere to re route or just make money.
Crews stay together. The have multiple flights a day so the can cx 3/4 and get the rest out. Swapping EDCTs. A plane delayed in PHX say will avalanche because we can’t put those pax anywhere unlike legacies that don’t have to wait on inbound
Heck just JFK look at the fuel lost. We’re always burning more fuel than we want. They recovery time for IROPs is way shorter. Our business model is wound so tight and based on things being normal.
We have a manager at United that sits in the Network Operations Center and his only job is to make sure that when we get EDCT's on high value or critical flights, to swap them with lower value or less critical flights. There are a ton of factors they look at, but its basically all done by software. All he does is call the FAA and asks them to swap specific EDCTs to minimize overall disruption based on numbers of connections, crew legalities, future aircraft usage, etc.
Reply
Old 07-06-2025 | 12:18 AM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
We have a manager at United that sits in the Network Operations Center and his only job is to make sure that when we get EDCT's on high value or critical flights, to swap them with lower value or less critical flights. There are a ton of factors they look at, but it’s basically all done by software. All he does is call the FAA and asks them to swap specific EDCTs to minimize overall disruption based on numbers of connections, crew legalities, future aircraft usage, etc.
So does Jetblue, but all our planes come from the same regions so swaps are not as effective
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ryder1587
Southwest
2156
12-11-2022 01:17 PM
MTSUFlyer
UPS
191
07-25-2022 07:42 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices