Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search
Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2021, 10:10 AM
  #10871  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,513
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Sure, I already mentioned it. Delta came to Comair with a deal for ALPA: 2 year pay freeze in exchange for 35 aircraft. A no vote means the aircraft go to Republic and Skywest. Vote passes 61% to 39%. Delta grabs one CRJ off of ASA’s certificate, gives it to Comair, and the pay freeze kicks in the first day it’s in revenue service. ASA guys throw a cow because “Comair took concessions to fly our planes” but they forget it overnight because Delta announces that ASA has just been sold to SKW.

Fast forward several weeks. Delta files bankruptcy, and as a wholly-owned, Comair goes BK as well. Delta immediately notifies Comair that, due to Comair’s BK status, they will not be able to receive any more aircraft. The aircraft slated for Comair are instead going to Republic. Several aircraft currently at Comair are also redistributed amongst other Delta regionals. Guess what happened to our pay? Still frozen, because a deal’s a deal.

The deal was, if Delta didn’t award Comair the promised aircraft, then TWO YEAR LATER our pay freeze is unfrozen. But in the meantime Delta 1113’d the Comair ALPA and the contract was negated. We never got the planes or the pay.

No hard feelings, though. I’m sure Delta had no idea that they were weeks from BK when, in good faith, they signed the deal with Comair.

But but our management is different....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 10:16 AM
  #10872  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,515
Default

Another thing... when I went to a roadshow and pointed out that two years was a long time to go without a raise, and that I didn’t trust Delta to deliver the planes on schedule, the MEC chair responded:

”ALPA legal has reviewed the language and it is iron-clad. And the company would never do that. They came to us with this deal. They have no incentive to break it.”

Our NC chair was an FO at Comair at the time. I hope he remembers the sting.
Boomer is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 10:26 AM
  #10873  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ted Striker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: B6
Posts: 777
Default

How about we get 50% of the revenue made from the scope carve outs in the form of a yearly bonus...think of it as a loan. We loan you the relief and we get paid for said loan.
Ted Striker is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 11:27 AM
  #10874  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 537
Default

Originally Posted by Ted Striker View Post
How about we get 50% of the revenue made from the scope carve outs in the form of a yearly bonus...think of it as a loan. We loan you the relief and we get paid for said loan.
Then they have a bunch of E175s doing our flying and furlough 1500-2000 and those 1500-2000 don’t get the bonus. No thanks.

Related to revenue shared...the escape clause for JetBlue to get out of this already signed deal, is page 6 here: (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...astallianc.htm). It shows a redacted amount, but it is an ungodly sum of money. I won’t share it here, but try to find someone from the union or company to tell you how much it is.

But hey, 2% and a waiting room and selling our scope for 7-12 years. Yeah. Seems worth it.
copy is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 11:53 AM
  #10875  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 985
Default

I hate this TA more every day.
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 12:24 PM
  #10876  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,515
Default

Originally Posted by copy View Post
Related to revenue shared...the escape clause for JetBlue to get out of this already signed deal, is page 6 here: (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...astallianc.htm)...
Interesting reading. 5.1 says that the NEA initial term will be for five years and will automatically renew every five years. If either party wishes to exit the deal when the five year term expires, the other party must be agreeable and that negotiations must take place to address the reasons for exiting the deal. Only by mutual agreement can one party exit the agreement. Failing that, the next five year term begins automatically.

Odd...No mention of a two-year wind-down.

So... in case of a conflict, which Jetblue contract takes precedence? The NEA with American, or LOA 13 with ALPA?

If I read this correctly, since Jetblue ALPA is not party to the NEA, then the MEC has no say in Jetblue exiting the deal in five years. Extrapolating this situation, if AA refuses to let Jetblue out of the deal, then I don’t see how ALPA can force the issue.

If JetBlue’s “escape clause” is, say, $50 million, then where does that money come from? Is there a judge out there that will force Jetblue to eat that cost because the MEC says “we haven’t hired enough pilots!” No, we’ll be stuck in the deal for another five years, and ALPA and management will be left figuring out how to smooth things over with the pilot group.
Boomer is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 01:55 PM
  #10877  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,515
Default

Oops, I found the wind-down language on the next page.

Does anyone see a discrepancy between the two contracts?

NEA contract...
5.11 Effect of Termination.

5.11.1 Upon termination, including pursuant to Section 3.4.3, each Party agrees to provide reasonable assistance to the other Party to wind down the NEA. The Agreement will be in effect during a wind-down period not to exceed 12 months but only for purposes of this Section 5.11.
Boomer is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 01:57 PM
  #10878  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,311
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
Oops, I found the wind-down language on the next page.

Does anyone see a discrepancy between the two contracts?

NEA contract...
5.11 Effect of Termination.

5.11.1 Upon termination, including pursuant to Section 3.4.3, each Party agrees to provide reasonable assistance to the other Party to wind down the NEA. The Agreement will be in effect during a wind-down period not to exceed 12 months but only for purposes of this Section 5.11.
LOA is 24 months after five years, 12 after renewal.
PotatoChip is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 02:06 PM
  #10879  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,515
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip View Post
LOA is 24 months after five years, 12 after renewal.
Exactly. LOA 13 allows a 24-month wind down. But the NEA only allows 12 months. And LOA 13 was written 6 months after the NEA effective date. Things that make you go Hmmmm...
Boomer is offline  
Old 01-31-2021, 04:05 PM
  #10880  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,513
Default


Our scope chairman is really proud of the first sentence.

I think he must’ve missed the second one. Let me tell you right now which side an arbitrator is gonna pick when the company changes something and challenges us on this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
270
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
39
05-29-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices