Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Wet Sock Smell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2018, 04:51 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
Default

I made a post over in Spirit’s forum asking for comment here.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 02-26-2018, 09:53 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1 View Post
I was in the back of a UA 320 and around 10k feet descending there was this horrible smell almost like burning plastic but it only lasted a few seconds. I wonder if this was it.
Yes, it's certainly possible (even probable?). "Fume Events" most often occur when the HP valve opens and they only last for a few seconds. A leaky APU or engine seal allows oil to collect in the bleed ducts. Then when the HP valve opens, that oil is pyrolyzed in the conditioned air ducting and the resultant "wet sock" smell is blasted into the cabin/cockpit depending on bleed system architecture. That "wet sock" smell is actually quite harmful. You may want to consider going to the hospital following an event like that. You should be checked for carbon monoxide exposure as soon as possible. Some of the symptoms of exposure are headaches, blurred vision, impaired cognition, etc...

Originally Posted by SuperDuty View Post
As far as I can find in my research, you are correct. With the exception of Spirit who has implemented an official procedure. These event are actually very common, but we don't hear about them very often because they are underreported. I think many crews simply don't think much of the smell; especially if it is short lived. Occasionally someone gets hurt. I wouldn't be overly concerned, except bran damage is permanent. Guys have lost medicals and even died.

I think airlines and manufactures have mostly brushed this issue under the rug. It's bad press. Watch the video I posted in the post above. It's Eric Tillman of Spirit giving a presentation to APA. It's loaded with tons of good info. I'll link again below.

https://www.alliedpilots.org/Committ...ated-Cabin-Air
Definitely watch the video; Eric Tellmann is well versed on the subject. Also, airlines and engine manufacturers are quick to discredit the real dangers due to their liability. Imagine the class action lawsuits coming their direction as this subject continues to gain traction? These companies have known for a very long time of the dangers their systems present to the airline crews and traveling public...it doesn't bode well for their collective futures.
As far as I know, the only airliner that isn't susceptible to fume events is the 787 due to it's pressurization/ air conditioning design (not part of the engine bleed air system).
ForTheWin is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 02:34 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ed Force One's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 707
Default

AeroToxic Association | Supporting those affected by Aerotoxic Syndrome ? The Aerotoxic Association was founded in 2007 by Captain John Hoyte

Looks like the site has been re-worked. They used to have a "What your doctor needs to know" link. I'd have to dig around on the new site, but this is something you must bookmark, IMO.
Ed Force One is offline  
Old 02-27-2018, 07:43 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
Default

From Spirit forum.

https://www.alliedpilots.org/Committ...ated-Cabin-Air
tom11011 is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 12:01 AM
  #25  
Don't need that HUD!
 
trent890's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B777/B787 - Flight Test
Posts: 317
Default NB Airbus Document

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
Thanks everyone for the responses. If I read everything correctly here, it sounds like there is no official document or guidance from Airbus, any airline, or ALPA correct?
Originally Posted by SuperDuty View Post
From 10:21 until 11:15 into the video presentation, there is discussion of an Airbus document that acknowledges engine oil will leak into the aircraft bleed air system and cause a musty smell. The end of the video has a listing of the References Cited for this Presentation, and the Airbus document information is repeated there as well. The In Service Information (ISI) reference that exists for the narrow body Airbus fleet relating to this issue is:

ISI Ref: 21.00.00018
A/C Type: A318 A319 A320 A321
Topic:
First Issue Date: 07-NOV-2013
Part Number:
Last Publication Date: 08-NOV-2013
trent890 is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 02:17 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 291
Default Obogs

Sounds similar to issues the Air Force and Navy/Marines have been having in their tactical and training jets since they ditched LOX for OBOGS based O2 delivery.
BFMthisA10 is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 05:40 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 88
Default

I can see the crazy lawsuits that would ensue, and the major risk to the profession if word of this gets out, resulting in decreased air travel, but airplane manufacturers really need to get on the ball and start designing their systems to prevent this from happening. I hope that Boeing’s new 797 is similar to the 787 in this respect, as it would be good to start phasing out those antiquated bleed systems, especially with the clean sheet designs (there is no excuse, putting those obviously faulty systems in new designs). I feel that Airbus is falling behind on this one and I’m not sure about Bombardiers’ system on the C Series but I for one, as a pilot and passenger would elect to fly on planes less likely to poison my brain, seat width be damned...
aiir is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 06:30 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,120
Default

I don't think it's the same issue as the military problem with OBOGS/MSOGS. I have 1000+ hours in OBOGS/MSOGS aircraft without a single incident, and then there was a huge increase after I quit flying those. So I think the military had *something* change in the system that is causing the problem, and they just can't figure out why the system goes from being just fine to being really bad across multiple fleets. My personal bet is that a supplier (or multiple suppliers) changed and there are parts in use that makes it not work right anymore even though they technically test OK on the bench. But that's just my guess.
flensr is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 03:47 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

I always thought it was CQ making me wacky.
qball is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 04:39 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

In the 880's when they wacked the turbo's and went to ram air, they called it "Perfumed Esther."
badflaps is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Merica
FedEx
1
11-22-2016 03:37 PM
CloudSailor
FedEx
111
02-03-2016 06:59 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
11
07-31-2010 04:57 AM
MoneyMan
Cargo
1
03-08-2009 01:44 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
4
05-04-2006 06:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices