Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
WSJ attacks 1500 hour rule causing pilot shor >

WSJ attacks 1500 hour rule causing pilot shor

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

WSJ attacks 1500 hour rule causing pilot shor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2021, 05:09 PM
  #31  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,647
Default

Originally Posted by kevin18 View Post
I think you donned a storm trooper helmet and missed my point. Marg was saying that the young pilots today have it so much easier. Claiming people don’t have to be CFIs or, gasp, fly single piloted in IFR. I wasn’t saying that isn’t the case. I was saying that’s the way it is. Especially in wrt aviation things have gotten easier as technology progresses. That’s the point of innovation. I then went on to point out that it’s like that through history in almost every aspect. I can’t think of something that’s harder to do now that was much easier back in the day.

I would question the intelligence of a person who insists on using paper charts these days more than be impressed by their ability to do so. Thumbing through those things was a pita and even more so when you had an airport in a completely different place than where you expected it to be because the name of the airport put it in x instead of city b.
Yeah my bad. No wonder I couldn’t hit anything. Need to swap for my Mando helm. 🍻

Side note—I definitely don’t want to go back to revising three Jepp volumes every two weeks…
at6d is online now  
Old 12-29-2021, 05:13 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Except that the 1500 hour rule for 121 FOs was never about safety. This was known since the day it was implemented.
Wait, I remember now. You're not in the airlines.

So I totally understand your personal motives to have 1500 TT removed. This isn't about what's good for the industry, this is just what's better for you.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 05:28 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Default

Originally Posted by kevin18 View Post
Its more of a supply and demand thing driving those. It’s easy to get in to a law school. However, getting in to a top tier law school not so much. As for medical schools the number of applicants far exceeds the seats available. If that were not the case the entry requirements would be significantly different.

I get it, it’s a tale as old as time, the older generation had it harder than the younger. It’s the same thing people in the generations before you said about you. That’s the thing about progress, it is supposed to make our lives easier. Don’t denigrate the younger ones simply because they have it different.

I know of people who held on to their paper charts until the last moment because they refused to go to an iPad. Does that make them better?

How do the docs manage to keep wages up with so many applicants and not as many slots. Seems to work opposite to airline pilots
dualinput is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 06:10 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,615
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post
Sounds like some people here want FOs to be the equivalent of vo-tech graduates. Anybody who passes a drug test can be a pilot in just a few short months...

That'll put the pattern bargaining ball back in managements court for a generation.
Amen. Any professional pilot that is against the 1500 rule should have their head examined. Like….seriously.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 07:17 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
I think this thread is getting twisted.

The Wall Street Journal article is NOT about aspiring pilots complaining about the 1500 rule. It’s *AIRLINE MANAGEMENT* complaining about the 1500 hour rule. If you watch the video edition of this article, you’ll see Scott Kirby testifying before Congress and complaining that United has grounded 100 jets because they don’t have enough pilots to fly them. And I’m quite sure he’s referring to R.J.s, not 737s or Airbuses.

And as a secondary issue and unintended consequence, (although it should be vividly obvious), giving-in to management’s wish and lowering the minimum flight experience requirement to, say 500 hours, would ultimately be devistating to the airline, (and 135), industry. If minimums were lowered to 500 hours, every C.F.I. would immediately get hired at a regional airline, leaving no one to train the next generation of pilots.

Here’s a link to back it up:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/new...cid=uxbndlbing

I was hoping that a senator would’ve pointed out the 1,000 pilots from xjt and tsa he left without jobs flying those same airplanes he is complaining about not having pilots to fly them.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 09:16 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
Default

If Congress doesn’t drop the 1500 rule, which I think they will, then the airlines are going to just have Congress approve single pilot 121 operations on planes that have automation (aka autoland). Worst case scenario if something happens to the pilot, ATC can tell the F/A how to program the autoland. End of story. Pilot shortage resolved.
CFIsoonToBeFO is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 09:18 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by CFIsoonToBeFO View Post
If Congress doesn’t drop the 1500 rule, which I think they will, then the airlines are going to just have Congress approve single pilot 121 operations on planes that have automation (aka autoland). Worst case scenario if something happens to the pilot, ATC can tell the F/A how to program the autoland. End of story. Pilot shortage resolved.
Dumbest thing I've ever read on these forums.
mcfadden is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 09:33 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by CFIsoonToBeFO View Post
If Congress doesn’t drop the 1500 rule, which I think they will, then the airlines are going to just have Congress approve single pilot 121 operations on planes that have automation (aka autoland). Worst case scenario if something happens to the pilot, ATC can tell the F/A how to program the autoland. End of story. Pilot shortage resolved.
ATC is going to tell a F/A how to program the autoland? Uh, what?
Blue Dude is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 09:39 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Dude View Post
ATC is going to tell a F/A how to program the autoland? Uh, what?
They will learn in their training classes and then in recurrent too. But yep this is the fix (airline management will try) if they cannot get rid of the 1500 rule. (I am not saying I support this, I am just saying this is the next step they will push for, if they have to go that far).
CFIsoonToBeFO is offline  
Old 12-29-2021, 09:44 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by CFIsoonToBeFO View Post
...Worst case scenario if something happens to the pilot, ATC can tell the F/A how to program the autoland. End of story. Pilot shortage resolved.
What pilot shortage? Why have pilots when ATC can just tell the FAs how to fly it. Problem solved.
Rroku is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviatoralex
Flight Schools and Training
18
06-27-2011 01:51 PM
N9840G
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-20-2011 11:19 AM
resetjet
Major
147
04-27-2011 11:18 AM
dutch747
Aviation Law
15
06-04-2010 03:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices